Debate Mansion

   

Politics : Party in power should?

Post Reply New Post

Page 1 of 1

raj5000

Moderator

raj5000

Joined: 01 January 2006

Posts: 11720

Posted: 09 June 2007 at 9:28pm | IP Logged

Debate : Political party which is in power should

A : Forget about the thought of retaining the power in next election and should focus on betterment of country.

OR

B : Focus on how they come to power in next elections, meanwhile if somethings are done for country's benefit, its is fine.

Choose A or B for interest of debate.

Dear Guest, Being an unregistered member you are missing out on participating in the lively discussions happening on the topic "Politics : Party in power should?" in Debate Mansion forum. In addition you lose out on the fun interactions with fellow members and other member exclusive features that India-Forums has to offer. Join India's most popular discussion portal on Indian Entertainment. It's FREE and registration is effortless so JOIN NOW!

IdeaQueen

IF-Dazzler

IdeaQueen

Joined: 23 August 2006

Posts: 3152

Posted: 10 June 2007 at 7:41am | IP Logged

In Satyakal governments were as mentioned in option A

and in

Kalyug governments are as mentioned in option B

I think People should follow Tamil nadu voters in that aspect,they simply change the govt that is in power ! They(voters) are not bothered about development,they are desperate to change the government!

Wishes,

Mythili

lighthouse

IF-Dazzler

lighthouse

Joined: 18 January 2006

Posts: 2842

Posted: 10 June 2007 at 2:11pm | IP Logged
Originally posted by raj5000

Debate : Political party which is in power should

A : Forget about the thought of retaining the power in next election and should focus on betterment of country.

OR

B : Focus on how they come to power in next elections, meanwhile if somethings are done for country's benefit, its is fine.

Choose A or B for interest of debate.

 It is like catch 22 situation.. In order to stay in power (in a democracy) they have to do what is good for the country or else they will be voted out in next election . Also one term (4 years) is not always enough to make a significant difference to the postive outcome of their policies so a 2nd term is a must or else the next president benefits from the policy changes like Clinton did after Reagan and Bush senior.

raj5000

Moderator

raj5000

Joined: 01 January 2006

Posts: 11720

Posted: 11 June 2007 at 9:51pm | IP Logged
Thanks for responses.
Mythili - "Kalyug governments " LOL LOL I know
LH - Thats Clap Clap response. Well am lik,e if political part in power cann't make a big change in 4 years of ruling, then no big hopes on them.

kabhi_21

IF-Rockerz

kabhi_21

Joined: 25 January 2006

Posts: 9942

Posted: 12 June 2007 at 1:30am | IP Logged
As per bhagwatgeeta.....

"Karm kar fal ki aasha mat kar"

There was a period when people worked without looking for power.... then came period when people stayed in power with little doing for people..... now is the period politics is opportunist.... in this 5 years earn for one self as much as possible.... then next government comes it earns in those 5 years and the last government comes back.... Ouch

spian

Senior Member

spian

Joined: 28 May 2007

Posts: 742

Posted: 12 June 2007 at 2:18am | IP Logged
Originally posted by raj5000

Debate : Political party which is in power should

A : Forget about the thought of retaining the power in next election and should focus on betterment of country.

Now this is an ideal situation. Akin to "Ram Rajya" but in todays time not feasibleLOL. No political party remembers how they canme to power and only focus on retaining it and if along the way development happens well thats incidental.

OR

B : Focus on how they come to power in next elections, meanwhile if somethings are done for country's benefit, its is fine.

Focusing and strategising on how to regain power is secondary objective after pilfering off public funds. If still they see chance of returning then they all go for it. Development in true sense is not on their immediate agenda. Networking with CEO's of companies and celebrities is also seen as beneficial for reasons known and unknown.

Choose A or B for interest of debate.



Edited by spian - 12 June 2007 at 2:19am

Post Reply New Post

Go to top

Related Topics

  Topics Topic Starter Replies Views Last Post
Politics in India Forums

2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 10 11

Crimson_Sky 86 6481 11 December 2009 at 10:46pm
By return_to_hades
Power Corrupts And Absolute Power Corrupts Absolut

2

Khatarnak 13 2512 05 September 2009 at 11:19am
By _Angie_
POLITICS FOR TV!!! rgupta29 0 313 07 May 2009 at 10:55am
By rgupta29
Politics and Relationships

2 3

return_to_hades 21 1039 06 March 2009 at 11:50am
By Gauri_3
Unity in Diversity in Indian Politics shrutichopra 6 1551 01 March 2009 at 2:38am
By peridot.

Forum Quick Jump

Forum Category

Active Forums

Limit search to this Forum only.

 

Disclaimer: All Logos and Pictures of various Channels, Shows, Artistes, Media Houses, Companies, Brands etc. belong to their respective owners, and are used to merely visually identify the Channels, Shows, Companies, Brands, etc. to the viewer. Incase of any issue please contact the webmaster.