Jassi Jaissi Koi Nahin General Discussion

India-Forums

   
Jassi Jaissi Koi Nahin General Discussion
Jassi Jaissi Koi Nahin General Discussion

SS dug Purab's grave (Page 7)

MrsKhan IF-Addictz
MrsKhan
MrsKhan

Joined: 04 October 2004
Posts: 64630

Posted: 25 November 2004 at 11:12pm | IP Logged
Originally posted by pj04

Originally posted by kshreya2002

Originally posted by jammy

Next time if you talk with your insider just ask him one question.

If what he is telling is true and SS kept them hanging then SS behaviour was very unproffesional why didnt Sony or DJ creations took some action against SS??

After all SS was not working on words he too was bound by contract, then why leave him after he give them such a big Dokha.


Jammy.



As far as i know SS has no contract . Also looks like u have seen how the TV industry works. the latest news is KTH's main hero Rajeev Khandelwal has walked out. Even EK+star plus cudnt do anything when he did. Im sure neither EK or star wanted him to walk out.

oh my god!!!! dearie all actor have contracts....it is for protection of everyone involved's professional interests. when an actor does not want to do a certain role...it would be very foolish to force him to do it under the pretext of contract, hence the actors walk out  all the time even lead and popular ones like rajeev khandelwal( btw if you did not know ekta has image of getting very airtight contracts signed by her actors....but she is wise enough to understand that it is hard/stupid to force an unwilling actor  to work in her organization).

       now for sakshi.....if you ever saw it ...you might notice some interesting things

1) samir' s work in sakshi was lot lot better than in jjkn

2) the story of sakshi was very weak......can you imagine the head of a anti terrorist agency to be a foriegn spy and he would be foolish enough to create a ruckus in his office to steal certain information , which he had access to all the time bcoz of his position in organization. spy shows have to have very strong storylines and appropriate ammount of action....emotions normally take a backseat.( i compare it to alias which had similar storyline)

3) samir and amit sadh were the only reason people tuned in

4) after shekhar's death there was nothing left in the show.

 



i just confirmed ONLY AA and Mona have a contract that too w/ sony and not even djs. rajeev khandelwal had a one year contract w/ balaji which has lapsed. he himself has confirmed this.
pj this is not usa. ppl usually work without contracts and if they do have them ppl hardly honour them.

MrsKhan IF-Addictz
MrsKhan
MrsKhan

Joined: 04 October 2004
Posts: 64630

Posted: 25 November 2004 at 11:13pm | IP Logged
Originally posted by jammy

Originally posted by kshreya2002



As far as i know SS has no contract . Also looks like u have seen how the TV industry works. the latest news is KTH's main hero Rajeev Khandelwal has walked out. Even EK+star plus cudnt do anything when he did. Im sure neither EK or star wanted him to walk out.

Confused

No Contract!!!

As far as I know he has contract, every actor does. Especially on JJKN, Apoorva has a contract, mallika has. And the most Airtight contract on the show is jassi's aka mona singh. As for SS, he has a more flexible contract, he was not intrested in coming back untill he felt that the story of his character (which was being streched beyond orginal) will do justice to the show or not.

 Also please you dont know rajeev has a contract too, but he gave ekta kapoor his side of story and him leaving the show is a mutual understanding between the actor and the producers of the show. Ektaa it seems is not afraid of replacing the leads or for that sake even the lead villains, evident from the replacing of mihir, kkusum, esha etc etc.  

Jammy.


read my reply to pjs post.
MrsKhan IF-Addictz
MrsKhan
MrsKhan

Joined: 04 October 2004
Posts: 64630

Posted: 25 November 2004 at 11:17pm | IP Logged
Originally posted by yashika

Originally posted by kshreya2002

maybe SS' character in both serials isnt imp enuf for the makers to pursue him w/ court cases. Also ive never seen even EK pursuing her actors when they quit. So i guess its the norm in TV industry.


Well, how does one know whether the character is imp in a show or not .....the barometer is the character's popularity amongst the audiences...and it is no secret that he was and still is extremely popular..... all over...

evidence:

- first poll where he got 76-78% votes

-second poll where he got 60% votes

-AAp jaisa koi finals..where he was voted amongst the three most popular stars on sony

add to this invitations to shows where legends are performing...and extensive media coverage...

this leaves no doubt abt his popularity/importance to the show

 

 

 



what! he is sooooooo popular? point to be noted all polls conducted by sony. the channels usually promote character whom they think will be imp for their shows. but the question is why did SET not intervene when the unfair producers were kicking out bechara(and popular) sameer? btw even ayushman was there in the top 3 of AJK contest, right? latest news is even he has been kicked out of the show. kshitij! beware!
jammy Goldie
jammy
jammy

Joined: 28 September 2004
Posts: 1025

Posted: 25 November 2004 at 11:42pm | IP Logged

Originally posted by kshreya2002


i just confirmed ONLY AA and Mona have a contract that too w/ sony and not even djs. rajeev khandelwal had a one year contract w/ balaji which has lapsed. he himself has confirmed this.
pj this is not usa. ppl usually work without contracts and if they do have them ppl hardly honour them.

Confirm again, SS had a six month contract . But it was a very flexible contract.

Agreed upon AA and mona singh contract, that even i  know, that is why AA never complained if his role was turned to black. thats why when minnie said how AA went through the negative part without complaining or quiting, I told minnie that AA had no other choice he was contratually bound to the channel.

Jammy.

MrsKhan IF-Addictz
MrsKhan
MrsKhan

Joined: 04 October 2004
Posts: 64630

Posted: 25 November 2004 at 11:49pm | IP Logged
yup! no idea abt purab's 6 month contract. anyways i guess its over if there was one. thank god!
yashika Senior Member
yashika
yashika

Joined: 17 September 2004
Posts: 298

Posted: 25 November 2004 at 11:52pm | IP Logged
Originally posted by kshreya2002

Originally posted by yashika

Originally posted by kshreya2002

maybe SS' character in both serials isnt imp enuf for the makers to pursue him w/ court cases. Also ive never seen even EK pursuing her actors when they quit. So i guess its the norm in TV industry.


Well, how does one know whether the character is imp in a show or not .....the barometer is the character's popularity amongst the audiences...and it is no secret that he was and still is extremely popular..... all over...

evidence:

- first poll where he got 76-78% votes

-second poll where he got 60% votes

-AAp jaisa koi finals..where he was voted amongst the three most popular stars on sony

add to this invitations to shows where legends are performing...and extensive media coverage...

this leaves no doubt abt his popularity/importance to the show



what! he is sooooooo popular? point to be noted all polls conducted by sony. the channels usually promote character whom they think will be imp for their shows. but the question is why did SET not intervene when the unfair producers were kicking out bechara(and popular) sameer? btw even ayushman was there in the top 3 of AJK contest, right? latest news is even he has been kicked out of the show. kshitij! beware!

 

good, so now you do acknowledge that he WAS considered imp by the channel and hence was promoted .....if u chk out, my post was in response to yr post that since purab's character was not considered imp enough by the makers/channel they did not respond with court cases:

Originally posted by kshreya2002

maybe SS' character in both serials isnt imp enuf for the makers to pursue him w/ court cases.

as far as SET not intervening when he was being kicked out...well, simple, coz he never was kicked out...he left on his own and since SET knew that he had a reson to do so as he had made 'his character not being made negative'...a precondition to his coming back...they let him go......and hence have no reason to go to media with their accusations..

 



Edited by yashika - 25 November 2004 at 11:54pm
pj04 Goldie
pj04
pj04

Joined: 02 September 2004
Posts: 1623

Posted: 25 November 2004 at 11:55pm | IP Logged

i just confirmed ONLY AA and Mona have a contract that too w/ sony and not even djs. rajeev khandelwal had a one year contract w/ balaji which has lapsed. he himself has confirmed this.
pj this is not usa. ppl usually work without contracts and if they do have them ppl hardly honour them

not true......usa or india ...you have contracts everywhere.....forget film /tv industry.....even when you go for a job you sign a contract in india.however contracts are usually signed for a short period initially after which they are extended or amended. i am sure rajeev is walking out now since his contract is up for renewal and this is the bargaining/amending /walking out time. by the way except for big production houses who invest all the money( balaji) most contracts are with the channels . even blf copyright is not held by tony and diya but sony. the contacts etc depend on your risk taking and investment capabilities. few directors/producers have resources of ekta kapoor(balaji). maybe this will help explain why ekta has so much leverage on channels unlike other directors. she has the optionof pulling out her shows off channel without a by your leave...alll actor are contracted with her, she holds copyrights to show/story. for all other shows channel has the liberty of replacing directors as they hold the copyright to story, contract with actors....most of the investment in the show etc.



Edited by pj04 - 25 November 2004 at 11:57pm
MrsKhan IF-Addictz
MrsKhan
MrsKhan

Joined: 04 October 2004
Posts: 64630

Posted: 25 November 2004 at 11:59pm | IP Logged
no pj. even balaji/EK doesnt have so much liberty. 

Go to top

Related Topics

  Topics Author Replies Views Last Post
Purabs insecurities

Author: shanti05   Replies: 2   Views: 535

shanti05 2 535 09 November 2007 at 5:52am by kiokyo
Armaans Ego, Purabs care

2 3 4 5

Author: sharna2k6   Replies: 38   Views: 2490

sharna2k6 38 2490 20 June 2007 at 11:10am by sharna2k6
samir/purabs pics on kumkum

2

Author: mikagurl23   Replies: 11   Views: 1211

mikagurl23 11 1211 08 September 2005 at 1:47am by Sharila
could CJ be purabs brother

2 3 4

Author: peacestead   Replies: 28   Views: 1883

peacestead 28 1883 07 July 2005 at 2:48pm by mikagurl23
Purabs future!

2

Author: simi1295   Replies: 11   Views: 1137

simi1295 11 1137 02 July 2005 at 7:20am by cutelovelygirl

Forum Quick Jump

Forum Category / Channels
Forums

Jassi Jaissi Koi Nahin General Discussion Topic Index

  • Please login to check your Last 10 Topics posted

Check these Celebrity also

Disclaimer: All Logos and Pictures of various Channels, Shows, Artistes, Media Houses, Companies, Brands etc. belong to their respective owners, and are used to merely visually identify the Channels, Shows, Companies, Brands, etc. to the viewer. Incase of any issue please contact the webmaster.

Popular Channels :
Star Plus | Zee TV | Sony TV | Colors TV | SAB TV | Life OK

Quick Links :
Top 100 TV Celebrities | Top 100 Bollywood Celebs | About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | Forum Index