CNN ARTICLE-
"Soldier pleads guilty in Iraq killings"
< ="" ="text/"> POSTED: 12:32 p.m. EST, November 15, 2006
< ="" ="text/">var clickExpire = "12/15/2006";"FORT CAMPBELL, Kentucky (AP) -- One of four U.S. soldiers accused of raping an Iraqi girl last spring and killing her and her family pleaded guilty Wednesday and will testify against the others.
Spc. James P. Barker agreed to the plea deal to avoid the death penalty, said his civilian attorney, David Sheldon."
The killings March 12 in Mahmoudiya, a village about 20 miles south of Baghdad, were among the worst in a series of alleged attacks on civilians and other abuses by military personnel in Iraq.
Sgt. Paul E. Cortez and Pfc. Jesse V. Spielman, both members of the 101st Airborne Division with Barker, could face the death penalty if convicted in the case in courts-martial at Fort Campbell.
The alleged ringleader, former Army private Steve Green, 21, pleaded not guilty last week to charges including murder and sexual assault.
Green was discharged from the Army for a "personality disorder" before the allegations became known, and prosecutors have yet to say if they will pursue the death penalty against him.
The indictment accuses Green and others of raping the girl and burning her body to conceal their crimes. It also alleges that Green and four others stationed at a nearby checkpoint killed the girl's father, mother and 6-year-old sister.
Barker has given investigators vivid accounts of the assault.
Copyright 2006 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed."
_______________________________________________________QUOTED ABOVE IS A RECENT CNN ARTICLE
REFERENCE LINK- http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/11/15/iraq.slaying.ap/index.html
_______________________________________________________
This is not the first time an article such as this raises several questions
1) Should one of the convicted coming out and pleading guilty be in a favorable position to AVOID death sentence while the other crime contributors potentially face it?
2) Should war crimes be looked at differently from other crimes? (soldiers at war are not completely thmselves.. -owing to the constant war rage, pressure, frustration, and separation from their loved ones, constant fear of death)
3) Knowing that everyone was a soldier involved in the crime, should an earlier revealed "personality disorder" help one of the criminals walk away?
I think that all of the soldiers involved in the heinous crime should be treated equally, prosecuted in a similar way and should face the same punishment if proven guilty. I am by no means, a student of law and would love to know your thoughts.
mQT
comment:
p_commentcount