\|/ LakshMila Parivaar #4 \|/ - Invites Only - Page 52

Originally posted by Anokhisharma

Jab aap khud van mein jaoge without any support aap apne aap ko khud protect karna jaan jaoge ...Uske liye practice ya koi special help ka koi need nahi hai... Everyone has the potential and capability...

Originally posted by TwinMadness

Hi Janaki :)

Originally posted by LakshMila

Good morning:)

Originally posted by Rex_Ryan

I agree that everyone has potential to survive and fight back ...but what I am saying about is circumstances and survival chances ...if you will go to forest (I mean a wildlife sanctuary where fierce animals persists) chances of your survival is low ...even well trained person can't survive sometimes ...because they are animals ...and only one rule exist for them maaroo ya maro(kill the enemy for your survival) and humans are enemy for them ...suppose you encounter with a group of lion ...what are your survival chances ...they will surely try to kill you for food and safety ...and they are self trained for this ...this is the only base of their existence ... or you can take the example of any other deadly animal ...forest doesn't offer anyone stepwise learning ...tribals exist in forest because they stay in group and attack in group and are trained to defend themselves ...but still they also die ...what I am taking about is force of nature and animals are also its part ...now coming to example from show when lakshman(general thinking) said initially about sita safety it was out of concern that she(anyone in her place which have no previous experience or training) needs time to adapt to forest conditions ...and what others(human nature to find easy way) say that she should stay back was also out of concern(which was wrong) ...as at this point of time she is not alone ...actually on one is alone ...they have company of each other ...what I pointed out wrong was her thinking that she can survive in that dangerous forest alone where rakshas attack that too in group ...and adovocating her point by taking examples of animals which are designed to stay alone in forest conditions ...but these animals are also adapted(evolved during centuries according to these conditions) they knew safe places and never encounter with the animals from they possess threat ...and if this happens they also dead most times ...what I want to say in short is that to survive for long time in these forest where we encounter nature everytime in one or other way... company is better for humans (both man and women)(because we are evolved to stay in groups) [BR]I hope now you got my point ...it was not meant only for sita ...it was meant for general thinking ...looking for wrong example under wrong circumstances from nature (thinking themselves over capable or above nature) ...nature chooses everyone style of existence ...and if one don't act accordingly its existence is in danger ...yes one have to change according to nature but their capacity is limited ...that's why ...older species are replaced by new one ...which have better adaptation ...this is cycle of nature no one can control it ...so better adapt accordingly for maximum survival [BR]so in short it was meant for human race ...not man and women (not for their individual capacity to exist in forest, compared to each other) whom thought they are above nature and its decision ...and can handle every circumstances very easily and according to their wish ...please look for news about forest and human encounter ...and you will find evidences of nature teaching lessons to human