This justice which is different for man and woman has to change - Page 2

Originally posted by: shruthiravi

Ram was not furthering the divide. An injustice has happened. How will Pradha be questioned. Only when the most prominent person is affected by Pratha. When Palace is affected by Pratha. 

Have you ever thought why 26/11 got more limelight than any other terrorist activity in India. Why Nirbhaya got more coverage than any other girl in India. 

Has terrrorism not happened before 26/11 or have rapes not happened before Nirbhaya. What was so special about them that made people sit up and notice. Question the laws. 26/11 had a much speedy disposition compared to many other terrorist cases. Same with Nirbhaya. SC is hearing the case now

While Suryanelli case which is 20 years old is still pending in SC. Why the disparity. 

Understand that what differentiated 26/11 from rest was that it attacked people in power. Taj Hotel which is the power centre of business and royalty was attacked. People sitting in the top knew they were not safe anymore. Terror can come to them and terror needs to be punished. 

Nirbhaya it was a middle class girl with ambition to study and work. She represented the new India. When she was raped the erthwhile middle class knew rape is not something that happens to some poor girls, girls in disadvantaged back grounds. But it can happen to their daughters. The hypocrisy and disdain with which atrocities and rules used on poor and disadvantaged people comes knocking at the door of those who think they are above law. They follow law. Law doesnt affect them. When you are affected yourself you will think about Pratha. Its implications. Need to change. Till that time it is someone else's problem. 

Ram could only change tradition or law only by ensuring and showing the praja how the tradition has affected him. How it affected the king. And he keeping the golden idol of Sita for Aswamedha is a tight slap for the society who has imposed such rules. She is pure to him, no one can take her place and it is only for the rajdharma the so called banishment happened. 

Originally posted by: shruthiravi

SKR cvs take a standing ovation. I am not sure what valmiki intended by Sita banishment. But I know for sure you vindicated ram today. The law of the land that gave punishment to the common girl has to be same for the queen. Today rajdharma did injustice to prakriti taking a stand with sanskriti. The dhobi girl was blemishless. Still she was punished because a society except woman to die than take help. When ram did vachan palan the dharma of it was questioned. Now when ram do rajdharma the dharma will be questioned. What a beauty inline with ram's character. He breaks nothing yet breaks everything. Ram rajya where through the thought process of people a kingdom was created where justice was equal.to common man and king.to man and woman. I was like I don't know. I can tell my heart skipped a beat.maryada purushottam.the person who is a staunch devotee of Krishna say today jai shri ram from the heart 

Originally posted by: shruthiravi

@xpalkix we wait because we have to see to feel it. We use our visual sense way too much though most times it shows us just the illusion. 

What is the color of any object we see. It is the color rejected by the object, not the color absorbed. So is sky actually blue or leaf actually green. 😃

Originally posted by: shruthiravi

Yes DD it was the monologue of the Dhobi. 

Coming to optics white color rejects everything, while black absorbs everything. It is extreme and no one can be like that. Why dont we understand there are other colors than black and white and choose the colors accordingly. You can choose some, reject some.