Villain who we loved and hated - Page 3

Posted: 8 years ago
If Mangala really loved the child she wouldn't be bringing up the issue of the child being abandoned by her parents again and again in front of the child.
If you are a mother make her forget the fact that she is abandoned by her parents/unwanted by her parents  and neutralise that feeling of abandonment with the love that you can give.If her love really made the child forget that she is an abandoned child then she could have been called a successful mother.

I have come across a video on the net about a single mother who is illiterate and has no family support she was a fruitseller.She couldn't give the materialistic pleasures and comforts that the child needed or wanted but she still wanted her child to have everything her heart desired and she taught her daughter in her own small ways how to go about getting what one wanted in life.The child wanted an ice stick but she couldn't afford it so she made one ice stick at home with fruits frozen in a small ice box which in no way can be compared to the ice candies and ice creams available in the market.The child liked it very much she learnt to prepare that and sell it and make money to buy what she wanted.

The closing scene was a contended mother content in the knowledge that her child will not suffer for want of anything even after she departs from this world because she has taughte her child to live and given her the ability to get what ever she wanted from life as a gift.

That is what mother's love is all about

That mother in the video was terrified at the thought of her child suffering in her absence that made her want to empower her child 

Anandi can see her children and be content with a knowledge that she is ensuring that they acquire all the skills that will help them in life even after she is gone. Does Mangala see motherhood that way?

Posted: 8 years ago
Originally posted by leavesandwaves


Mangala has a junoon about Nimboli which is at once good and bad.

Anandi is somewhat laidback which is also not acceptable.

Even if Anandi had no resources like money, literacy and support, she would not have stooped to that level. While Mangala would have stooped to that level even if she had everything. Because one is possessed with junoon and one is not.
Anandi is not really laid back but her junoon is different from the way she perceives things she is not in a position to reveal to the child she is her mother which we do not agree to.
Her junoon is to give her child the life that she deserves.Her desire as a mother is to give her child everything and receive her child's love rather than possessing rights over the child.
So she is not waiting for the day when she hears her child address her as maa and to keep her child with her she is willing to put up wth Mangala.
Anandi's approach is inclusive and what is precious to her daughter are very important to her where as Mangala is trying to exclude everyone and everything from the child's world.
So Anandi's methods may be tiresome but they fetch results because of her positive approach
Posted: 8 years ago
There is a lot of difference between Amol and Nimboli. First of all he was legally adopted whereas Nimboli was kidnapped. Secondly Amol was well taken care of. His disability was cured because of Anandi and her efforts. Whereas Nimboli only suffered in Jhalra. 
It's not always about money. It's about caring and no one cared in Jhalra if Nimboli had a good childhood or not. Even now I can't understand with what guts is Mangala planning to take Nimboli to Jhalra. Only Akhiraj is dead but what about the lusty Kundan? And what about Nimboli and her future, her education etc. Mangala has clearly no such intentions as we can see. 

I totally agree Anandi is simply delaying telling the truth but that doesn't mean Mangala is free to go where she wants along with Nimboli. Maybe Nimboli doesn't know but Mangala knows that Anandi is Nimbolis mother. 
Posted: 8 years ago
With what rights Mangala thinks that she can take the child along with her to a place which is proven to be totally unsafe is beyond comprehension.
She very well knows that Anandi has full legal rights over the child and even if Mangala goes to court wanting custody of the child she will not get the child in legal battle too because they will look into the background of the person.

Anandi may be delaying the moment but that doesn't give Mangala any rights to take the child where ever she wants to take her.What will Mangala do if Anandi came after her with entire police force and slaps a kidnap case against her? Nothing

Just because Anandi is not using the rights that nature as well as law and of course nurturing too that doesn't mean she is weak or ineffectual.
Anandi as CC has made a much bigger impact on that child than Mangala did in her entire 11 years and this is not just because Anandi is rich and educated but her total personality.If Mangala thinks that she can keep the child away from CC then also she is wrong.

But unfortunately the way things are looking right now Mangala in all her stupidity will ignore Anandi's rights as well as the factors that give more power to Anandi and gets to walk away with the child taking advantage the child's trust in her and Anandi's goodness🤢
Posted: 8 years ago
Personally all i can see is that Mangala kept Nimboli alive for 11 years despite being uneducated, financially weak and in a very hostile environment!
Whereas Anandi lost Nandini within few months of her birth and has now made her a victim of her twin brother's anger despite being educated, financially independent and in a very secure environment!
Posted: 8 years ago
Originally posted by libsrocks


Personally all i can see is that Mangala kept Nimboli alive for 11 years despite being uneducated, financially weak and in a very hostile environment!
Whereas Anandi lost Nandini within few months of her birth and has now made her a victim of her twin brother's anger despite being educated, financially independent and in a very secure environment!


I think the same Mangala after becoming relatively safe physically has turned out to be a schemer.

Anandi whether educated or uneducated, whether rich or poor, will remain the same. Not taking action at the right time. Are we not seeing financially independent women making foolish choices?

Nimboli was kept alive due to Harki's desire to have a slave who could do all the housework. And Akheraj was earning to feed all of them.

Forget anandi  Is not Mangala doing injustice to the child by her manipulations? Her selfishness to keep the girl for herself overrides her concern for the girl. Seems some people dont want to acknowledge what Mangala is upto nowadays.

Edited by leavesandwaves - 8 years ago
Posted: 8 years ago
Originally posted by leavesandwaves




I think the same Mangala after becoming relatively safe physically has turned out to be a schemer.

Anandi wnether educated or uneducated, whether rich or poor, will remain the same. Not taking action at the right time. Are we not seeing financially independent women making foolish choices?

Nimboli was kept alive due to Harki's desire to have a slave who could do all the housework. And Akheraj was earning to feed all of them.

Forget anandi  Is not Mangala doing injustice to the child by her manipulations? Her selfishness to keep the girl for herself overrides her concern for the girl. Seems some people dont want to acknowledge what Mangala is upto nowadays.

@red True.Anandi's problems are because of the flaw in her personality This problem has nothing to do with her educational status or financial status..As per the CVs she is a human being and not some divine character or some super woman to be devoid of flaws.
She is a good woman who has a few flaws which give her and others problems in an other wise virtuous pure hearted character with good intentions at all times.

Nimboli was alive because of Akheraj and Harki's own compulsions.She is kept alive by them because they wanted to wash off the dosh in Kundan's Kundali and not just because of Mangala
Punishments and beatings starvings never really scarred the child's psyche even though those punishments were at times dangerous and life threatening because even Harki and Kamili were subjected to violence by Akheraj and Kundan.
But what bothered the child was this constant taunts about her being foundling and being treated like an unwanted baggage. Mangala also endorsed Akheraj's story about the child being found in garbage bin.This is what has damaged the child most.

So it can't be said that Mangala protected her from every violence.She may have been succesful in protecting that child at times from physical abuse but she took an active part in emotional abuse all these 11 years.

Anandi can be blamed for her kids' suffering now but that Anandi's inaction or inertia are not the reason for what Mangala is doing with the kids now.


Posted: 8 years ago
As AkhiRaj mentioned Mangla is a creepy water under the bed that is true
Posted: 8 years ago
Originally posted by libsrocks


Personally all i can see is that Mangala kept Nimboli alive for 11 years despite being uneducated, financially weak and in a very hostile environment!
Whereas Anandi lost Nandini within few months of her birth and has now made her a victim of her twin brother's anger despite being educated, financially independent and in a very secure environment!

Anandi took her baby to an unsafe location but of course kidnapping was something totally unexpected. Whereas Mangala knows that there has been a rape attempt on Nimboli few times already still she wants to take her there. Who is more wise or foolish?


I will definitely not call Mangala foolish. She is just plain selfish. If she was a real mother she may not have thought about Jhalra. Okay she can't provide education because it was a hostile environment earlier. But what about now? There is Anandi and a bright future in front of Nimboli still she wants to take her away from all this. What will you  say to this?
Edited by fast trak - 8 years ago
Posted: 8 years ago
Originally posted by fast trak



Anandi took her baby to an unsafe location but of course kidnapping was something totally unexpected. Whereas Mangala knows that there has been a rape attempt on Nimboli few times already still she wants to take her there. Who is more wise or foolish?


I will definitely not call Mangala foolish. She is just plain selfish. If she was a real mother she may not have thought about Jhalra. Okay she can't provide education because it was a hostile environment earlier. But what about now? There is Anandi and a bright future in front of Nimboli still she wants to take her away from all this. What will you  say to this?


There is only one answer to this.

CVS has turned her black overnite to show Anandi great😃

Dont you know that.

Anandi's fault is Anandi's fault, But Mangala's fault is CVs fault.


But thruth is Anandi is always slow in decision making

Related Topics

No Related topics found

Topic Info

8 Participants 30 Replies 2729Views

Topic started by leavesandwaves

Last replied by fast trak

loader
loader
up-open TOP