History repeats!! - Page 2

I reiterate. I hope nandini knows the 'full truth'. Not the twisted stories and half truth .

There are many lies hidden truths and twisted truths from Mangala's side too.

I am sure - writers will bring out all the hidden truth of Mangala's side - but truth of Anandi - there are loads - will remain hidden. If Shivam, who has spent almost all his life in BH does not know that they are really not his family, when even simple fact that he has a twin sister also was hidden from him for almost 12 years - what can be expected? Even now - DS and Anandi are trying to dazzle the child through wealth and cheating - they are trying to bring her close to Anandi without telling the truth. If she comes close to Anandi - then when the half-truth will be revealed - her reaction will be mild. 

Prashna yeh hai ki Nimboli ko Sachcha sach batayega koun? Mangla to bata ne se rahi, Anandi bata nahi Shakti to nimboli ko sahi rasta dikhayega koun? mujhe lagraha tha ki Dadisa mangla ko samjh paayenge par ab nahi lagta ki dadisa use samjh paayi hai, woh bhull gayi hai ki jab dekho tab sona, peise bhavna o ko kharid nahi Shakti. dadisa mangla ke sath jo kar rahi hai, woh bilkul galat hai. yahan dr Anant hi mangla aur nimboli ko samjh shaktein hai. 

Anandi and Jagya got the lady back with them because they know that the child is attached to her and they know the lady ran away because she is attached to the child.

Saving a life itself made her mother - though she could not get the girl call her mother because she could only think of the idea of marriage with Kundan to save her life. And since Mangala is teesa of Kundan, naturally Kundan's wife will also call her teesa. How this is related to mangala's claim of loving the child as her daughter? A mother gives birth to a child - and since Nandini died under the sword of Akhera and Nimboli born - Mangala is the mother - she brought Nimboli in this world. 

Saving life makes her mother?

Originally posted by: aparnauma

Saving life makes her mother?

Then what about the lives that Anandi saved? 

Didn't Anandi save Jagya from death by bullets? Did that give rights over Jagya?

Saving one's life since when did that give the person claims over the life of a person she /he saved? 

Nandini did not die.Had it been just Nimboli she would have been happy with what her Teesa gave her.Nimboli wouldn't feel angry with her mother but it is Nandini who feels angry with her mother.

Nimboli wouldn't have cared whether she was dumped or snatched.

At the end of the day the girl is Nandini and her longing for her mother gets reflected in her anger against her. 

The child has lived as Akheraj family maid cum DIL in that house not as Mangala's daughter 

The child call her mother because she was told to and not because she feels that the lady is her mother

If Mangala claims to be her mother because she is under her care all these years she should own up her responsibilities towards the child too.

Nobody can claim rights and ignore responsibilities.

Anandi's child was safe and well until she was snatched from her hands.

But was the girl safe under Mangala's care in all these years?Has Mangala been able to prevent the abuse?

Originally posted by: aparnauma

Saving life makes her mother?

Then what about the lives that Anandi saved? 

Didn't Anandi save Jagya from death by bullets? Did that give rights over Jagya?

Saving one's life since when did that give the person claims over the life of a person she /he saved? 

Nandini did not die.Had it been just Nimboli she would have been happy with what her Teesa gave her.Nimboli wouldn't feel angry with her mother but it is Nandini who feels angry with her mother.

Nimboli wouldn't have cared whether she was dumped or snatched.

At the end of the day the girl is Nandini and her longing for her mother gets reflected in her anger against her. 

The child has lived as Akheraj family maid cum DIL in that house not as Mangala's daughter 

The child call her mother because she was told to and not because she feels that the lady is her mother

If Mangala claims to be her mother because she is under her care all these years she should own up her responsibilities towards the child too.

Nobody can claim rights and ignore responsibilities.

Anandi's child was safe and well until she was snatched from her hands.

But was the girl safe under Mangala's care in all these years?Has Mangala been able to prevent the abuse?

Strange thing to say.Saving life makes her mother?