the finishing touches - Page 7

Nobody ever gets over their weaknesses permanently.

Since everyone is drawing Yashoda anamoly, I would like to say my two cents.

If Mangala is Yashoda, then Akheraj cant be Kans. Mangala should have been Devki.

But Krishna in Yashoda's care did not undergo what Nimboli underwent. Yashoda loved him more than her own son and saw to it he got everything without any torture.

Mangala is a somewhat Yashoda  because Kans decided to live under the same roof.

Even Anandi is not Devki beacuse she was not imprisoned but her Krishna was snatched by Kans.

As Kans is behind bars, Krishna has to choose who to call mother. Let us leave the decision to Krishna.

Just now I was listening various lovely singers sing that beautiful telugu song Tellavara vachche teliyaka na swamy. Utterly melodious. Waking up Krishna who was still sleeping.

It is quite obvious that the promo is being released in bits and pieces to give an idea what the story is likely to be.😛

Krishna in Yashoda's care was subjected to attacks right from he was an infant and continued to fight with various demons till he remained in Yashoda's care. He remained illiterate and was subjected to child labour since the time he was old enough to take the cows to pastures/jungle for grazing. Not a life he deserved. What Nimboli suffered at the hands of Akhera and Harki is different from Krishna story though and when Mangla said she is yashoda - it was only in context of herself and the girl. She was not saying who is Kans etc.  

This content was originally posted by: leavesandwaves

Anandi is a giver than a snatcher. She will do what is in the best interest of Nimboli.

The best interest of Nimboli may not be exactly the best interest of Mangala.

@bold - Not necessarily. If she always did the best for nimboli, Nandini wouldn't be in this position today. 😛

This content was originally posted by: SPuja

Krishna in Yashoda's care was subjected to attacks right from he was an infant and continued to fight with various demons till he remained in Yashoda's care. He remained illiterate and was subjected to child labour since the time he was old enough to take the cows to pastures/jungle for grazing. Not a life he deserved. What Nimboli suffered at the hands of Akhera and Harki is different from Krishna story though and when Mangla said she is yashoda - it was only in context of herself and the girl. She was not saying who is Kans etc.  

The story is beautiful and is open for various interpretations.

And a lot of characters changed overnight. Be it DS or Anup. Even J was changed from bad to good in just one scene - when he accepted that he did railway ghotala. Everybody accepted that J has changed. Sanchi also changed (even her clothes also) overnight. I don't clearly remember DS changes but perhaps she was bad till Anandi was sent to maika at 13 and became good when Anandi returned. 

This content was originally posted by: The_Alchemist.

@bold - Not necessarily. If she always did the best for nimboli, Nandini wouldn't be in this position today. 😛

Yes, she did best for Nimboli with some conditions. Not unconditional.

I think in Krishna times, even Kundans would have gone to graze the cows.

I think Yashoda is only with reference to Mangla not being biological mother. Yashoda also gave whatever she could to the child and was resistant when she learnt that this child belongs to someone else. In north India - such interpretations are common.