Posted:
Was it right of Ishita to bring in the Molestation matter again? Couldn't they find some other better reason for keeping param away from Simmi and Ananya?
Originally posted by: RaimaVFor Ishita, molestation is a fun. 😆
Originally posted by: sunitas123
By this logic, more than ishita, for Raman it is fun. he gives empty threats and then ends up working with the molestor, plus his ex-wife's lover ...😆 He never shouts as much on the molestor as he does on Ishita😆
Originally posted by: RaimaV
Ishita finds pros and cons of her OWN molestation, that's real fun being a woman. 😆
No one can ever beat Ishita in that department. 😆😆
Originally posted by: shravsssy was it wrong...
She just pointed it out to let him know his place...A person who is a molester, Why would he be allowed to see his daughter...
Originally posted by: deejagi
Dear for the Ishita need to prove him guilty in the court and that is next to impossible as she doesn't have any witness to support her in this regard. neither Ashok nor Suraj will help her out this time. Though for Mihika's sake, Ashok gave statement against Shagun in Ruhi custody case, this time he is waiting for chances to defeat Ishita and he will use this to defame her.
Originally posted by: deejagi
That's what I felt bad yesterday when she tried to threaten Param about her complaining against him for molestation. Don't she know that she needs to give witness in the court and prove that Param molested her. Who will give a supporting statement against param? Will Ashok do that or will it be Suraj? By the time both Raman & Mani reached the spot, she was out of the party hall and they can't stand as witness.People try to forget such incidents in life where as she is remembering that as an achievement. Instead Simmi could lodge a complaint against him with police and seek for justice. Then Ishita and others can support her stand with their resources.
Originally posted by: shravsss
But , if you remember the case was on...He was just out on bail...Ishita has the right to accuse him for that... as his own , wife and in laws are supporting...And Sarika was a main proof... they subjected...Its just important for you to put forth the man's character... court doesn't need a eye witness... especially in a Domestic Molestation cases...This was the main thing... which MIhika also used, to get out of Ashok's clutches... though they didnt show any update about such cases... they are more interested in Subbu to Subappa process...these CVs😡...
comment:
p_commentcount