We all have some sort of idea about the kind of dinner that Pam and Ragini are going to have, courtesy the precap.
Pam is a great player. She will try all ways to keep Ragini away from Nachiket's life. She knows that she cannot control Nachiket anymore - the Neil who had been cultivated all these years carefully and meticulously, have now lost to Nachiket. Pam also knows that now the only person who can keep Nachiket in check is Ragini. Ragini has definitely won Round One of the game, without even playing.
Hence, she will start emotionally blackmailing Ragini, necessitating NR to take a step back and hide (if that's the correct word) the truth about their alliance, their status. So, Pam is that part of the family, along with Ranbir, who will oppose NR getting together. So sad ! They so deserve to be together after so many years of separation, hatred and loneliness.
I feel Pam will now use the KIDS card. She knows she has lost the battle for her Brother. I understand that she has brought up those kids after the separation, because Neil had been an absentee Father. Of course, she would not want to lose the kids.
BUT, is she right in openly telling Ragini to forget her kids [and Nachiket] and let them go back to US? It's not as if Ragini has been winner in this divorce and separation saga. Further, Nachiket does love her, despite all odds. His happiness is intertwined with hers and at this jucnture of his life, he defintiely needs and/ or wants Ragini back so that they can rebuild their family.
Pam's words were a veiled atatck - how she tells R that she will go away from their lives if her dream of a beautiful family becomes a reality.
Turned me off, though I understand that the scene will be a major one. And we will get to see some power packed acting from both.
But is this justified? I find her to be Super Mean ...
Pam will never understand Ragini, but she could at least think of the others who surely want Ragini back in their lives ...
