This content was originally posted by: Sandhya.Aπ
Itni nice nice discussions. Samay ka abhaav.πThanks for the XXXL size laurel wreath aunty.π Rao, the rogue indeedSwiss cheese? This plot is now as full of holes as a sieve.π²Maya is up. Eeeks...Mona Darling still missing.π€ͺ
This content was originally posted by: Sandhya.AExcellent post aunty.
Least suspicious is guilty. Heroines are all bhaashaning mahaans. Insaaniyat and manushyatha have to be upheld by the heroine inspired heroes even at the cost of logic practicality and common sense. Money and materialistic things are least important in life. Heroes can bash up 29 opponents at a time ( 529 if it is Rajinikant). These are all inwritten rules in our desi tinseltown. Plus of course mera Bharat mahaan in movies even if totally out of context.Wouldn't mind any of these standard formula stuff if it fits in logically. Rao as rogue theory has so many gaping holes, most of which you have explained so well.Why on earth did he have to have Shivanand captured and tortured for information when the adoring shishya would have offered any and every information on a platter.π²What kind of control did Rao have on the Cardinal and why on earth did he have to get him kill himself suddenly now?Why and how does he alternate between his civil attire and uniform ?Wherefrom unknown to Tiwari does he oversee the Kumbha Mela?Why does he reveal his villain identity now? What has happened suddenly that he has decided to unmask himself?He never did anything as a professor. What is he doing or propose to do as the boss no.1?What a damp squib of a twist if it could be called one?I never thought that i would be exasperated to see Shivanand on screen, but i am. Did anyone tell him or the director that Manish Wadhwa was acting well as one who lost his marbles? Too much salt spoils the dish. Shivanand wailing incessantly is also absolutely tasteless.π€’ i rather prefer to watch jodhasa's evening lecture.Missed out some parts.Why does Rudr go to vishlok? Where and how and by whom was the theory 'naag bali- garuda powers in lieu of naga lives' formulated ? How does naga blood nullify the vish in rudra? Isn't it supposed to intensify? Some one please explain. And lastly how and WHY is Maya up? Isn't the show already soporific enough?If the direcor can connect all loose ends, offer some reasonable explanation, given the current state of affairs he HAS to be a magician.But he has earned an indemnity from all our frustrations due to the mess he has created by that one stand alone encounter between Dhansh and MB. Wow. What a duo. If I fell for JA( unwisely on retrospect ) it was because of episode 31, where we had Jalal as a master strategist playing superbly against his opponent. The game was charming and wonderful even if totally one sided. But here we had a superb match of opponents who were equally good. In planning foreseeing negotiating and the actors were equally good. Not many can hold their own against Seema Biswas but Rahil did. That too in his trademark style that was quite irritating at the start.A gem of a scene. πMB was offering Dhansh the bait. Just tempting enough to hook him and large enough to tempt without rousing suspicion.A third book? How does MB know and if she knows everything why isn't she the garud pramukh?
This content was originally posted by: .VeritaserumSo so sorry for the late reply.
This show has been oscillating between excellence and mediocrity for quite some time, and the Butler did it kind of situation is far too tempting for novice and lazy mystery writers to adapt and work around. Logic jaaye baad mein. I will NEVER compare the meek and comical Rao to the "Napolean of Crime" Moriarty. (Although I consider Dansh to be a total rip off of BBC Sherlock's Moriarty) Dr Rao, at best, is akin to The Teacher alias Professor Teabing from another pretentious page turner by the overrated Dan Brown, The Da Vinci Code. Stephen Fry famously dissed the novel too πRight now, I am watching the show only for Seema Biswas. Bhairavi-Dansh war of words is one of the best scenes on this show. She is so good that even an inconsistent actor like Rahil rose to the occasion and gave a spectacular performance. Can't fault him as Dansh is such a tricky character to play and I should be a less harsher towards him from now on!
This content was originally posted by: sashashyam
The Da Vinci Code is very poor in literary terms - even if I was not looking for the grace and elegance of Tolkien. But one has to concede that it is very fast paced, no matter how insane it looks for Jacques Saunier to do a Vitruvian man and write that ultra abstruse message when he was dying in agony, instead of doing something practical. It is not easy to keep up that pace and then wind it all up reasonably well. Just look at the mess here!
This content was originally posted by: Sandhya.A
i never understand why Teabing had to get all the 4 Grand Masters of the Priory eliminated in the first place without having the details of the Holy Grail himself. Also why would he engage langdon and Sophie and explain the story to them?Even in HP i have wondered why the ministry never used time turners to solve cases when they could be given to students to attend classes. Why trials? π²But these are all nothing compared to the sieve holes in our plots.πHaven't read Tolkien or seen the movie either. That good aunty?
comment:
p_commentcount