Karishma threw Sushant under the Bus and washed off her hands - Page 5

Originally posted by: advocate_sakshi

oh woww ... so u r saying that gulatis should have humbly asked Sushant before bringing this topic ?  ... 

Back then, she said yes to her make up and No to sushant getting relieved of his sevak duties.  Edited by DangerouslySafe - 9 years ago

Originally posted by: KJasoosChulbulP

No. He actually committed violence at least twice. So gauti is guilty by association. I think not. In fact gauti has still said on wkw that he is 2000% sure that Punz won't commit violence despite having done it twice. Again guilty not just by association. I think not ...as each to their own... Each person is themselves responsive for their words and actions ...

BTW I think actual physical violence is way worse than words...

Bad guy one: Hey lets go on a rampage and arrange an x number of peoples funeral. Lets bomb them into oblivion.

Originally posted by: TheBoss

Bad guy one: Hey lets go on a rampage and arrange an x number of peoples funeral. Lets bomb them into oblivion.

Bad guys friend: ha ha ha ha

Unless Karishma was held to a gun point she should have walked away, or the least not laugh on that serious matter.

Originally posted by: TheBoss

Bad guy one: Hey lets go on a rampage and arrange an x number of peoples funeral. Lets bomb them into oblivion.

Bad guys friend: ha ha ha ha

Unless Karishma was held to a gun point she should have walked away, or the least not laugh on that serious matter.

had i been at her place .. i would have said ... DONT TALK LIKE THAT ITS A VERY BAD THING TO SAY ABOUT ANY INDIVIDUAL ... 

Originally posted by: annu_ms

Some non sense Sushant told why in this world she has to take the blame to herself?PPl are literally after her life.If she cries then problem after seeing her mother she didnt make big drama and crying session that is again problemj😡

Edited by ranirox4500 - 9 years ago

Originally posted by: advocate_sakshi

I ]had i been at her place .. i would have said ... DONT TALK LIKE THAT ITS A VERY BAD THING TO SAY ABOUT ANY INDIVIDUAL ... 

Edited by TheBoss - 9 years ago

Originally posted by: sha1

Your first bold- Context my friend never lose the big picture- Violence that you are saying Puneet did- Gautam has many times stopped it and definitely never laughed when Puneet went violent with someone. Basically he never encouraged it or partake in it- He did definitely say that Puneet wouldn't Hurt anyone which I too believe is right- I don't think Puneet has it in his heart to physically hurt anyone - He is overly emotional but wouldn't hurt anybody plus if at all his violence was fatally dangerous then I don't think people would participate in tasks with Puneet. Its all hype for the show because of his one incident about 30 years ago with Amitab bacchan - SO now it not the same thing comparing Gautam to Karishma with this analogy- Cause he never laughed or sided with Puneet's acts of violence.

To your second bol- I'll let your opinion be But it is a fact that physical violence can be forgotten overtime once the wounds heal - Words can pierce your soul and heart and is harder to forget and heal. Thats my opinion.

Hain? Physical wounds heal but words are remembered for eternity ? not all physical wounds heal but even if they do,.. It's way worse... Yeh to mainey pehli baar soona ki words are worse than physical violence itself...

And correction ... Punz committed violence thrice

1. Gauti
2. Arya
3. Tanna push on door during museum task

And it could be alleged that gauti egged him on by not only crying for him as if he did nothing but in fact vouching for him when he has been guilty not once. Not twice but thrice..

Wait. 4 times. He also went on to do something to pranit after the martial arts move on arya.

Btw I am not saying gauti is guilty by association as I believe on "accountability for ones actions"...

However if the yardstick is tanna is guilty for laughing then gauti is too for crying and vouching.

Also lets not forget the manhandling by Pritam of dimpy in chair task. Hit her by hook too and threatened to hit her. Gauti keeps telling Dimpy she is wrong ... Nor took a stand on that ...

We can go in circles here I think so am gonna stop (just to be clear I don't think either of them are guilty by association)...

Originally posted by: TheBoss

I agree. Since your username is Advocate Im hoping you are a lawyer. Even in the court of law people have been convicted of association for such events. If two people were in the room and planning somebodys kidnap and murder and one the other was laughing they are both charged with planning such offence. Laughing is a sign of affirmative.

Now coming back to the Game. Gautam was having a fight with Dimpy. However when Ali used the word "ladki ki haisiyat nahi hai" Gautam immediately corrected him and warned him not to use such words.

yup i am and i hope my future kids wont feel bad if someone wud ask them to behave well like ur mother ... but ya u r right she was affirmative of the desire shown by Sushant ...