Originally posted by: -Rani
What I am trying to say is people become hypocrites without even realizing it. You probably forgot that you are arguing with me because of Gautam's comment on bringing in Dimpy's father's name and you are doing the same to me😆😆.
chalo meri angrezi ki problem hai..because i use 'you' when quoting generic examples..but i think context made it so clear that even if I am arguing with you...no one says that between two people communicating..3rd party examples can't be brought in😆
You better brush up your English then when you argue with me next time because that creates unnecessary arguments😉😆😆
acha that i will do..but you need to improve your critical reasoning and infrential analysis as well..warna to tum kal bologi ki physics, chemistry, maths subjects should not be taught because english over logic😆
logical baat thi..wo tumne answer ki nahi..ab phir random bahane bana rahi ho
This argument could have been carried on without bringing someone's parents (even for example purposes) specially when the topic of discussion is the same and you are against it😆😆 This is called true hypocrisy and even yo have to agree with me here 😉😆😆
not at all..the topic is about bringing in parents to draw a personal connection with intent of drawing a relationship that may not be all praiseworthy.. ( y did he need to bring he is a lawyer..was he taunting Dimpy on her communication skills, was he trying to tell her to mind her language and thus show she is being a blot on her family)😆 I feel Gautam was right in all this😃 Dimpy should learn to watch her mouth when she speaks. Disclaimer: This is strictly my opinion and not up for debate 😉🤣 Asking for any justification will be considered forcing to change my opinion😉🤣
Disclaimer: you putting a disclaimer is forcing me to turn a blind eye to wrong statements being made...and forcing me to curb my right to free speech😆
and gautam is not right because when others talk abt his family he reacts..when he degrades others he enjoys but when it comes to him then he cries fowl..and quite a few supporters of his
i didn't bring 'anyone's ' parents in this...i told you unconditional loyalty by your definition falls flat if object of unconditional loyalty are 'parents' which is a common noun alluding to people who are considered the most selfless beings within any species..😆
I feel the parents example in Dimpy Gautam case is extremely irrelevant 😉😆😆 Dimpy never gave her unconditional support to Gautam, she always wanted same thing in return from her which is as conditional as gets. If kids don't obey their parents or vice versa, they don't leave them and join enemies like Dimpy did😡
Again It's my opinion and expecting people to respect my opinion and disagree with will be the decent thing to do here😃😃
and i will get back to my main comment that started all this..does unconditional support means letting yourself get treated as a toilet paper without any self respect..does unconditional support means that you are wrong to expect them to care for you?..does it mean they can dump you throw you..and you should still have a supernatural belief in them ?..then in that case i want to know from you what are parents?- are they extremely selfish community? where is merit in your definition on unconditional...if kids don't obey they get slapped..they get taught...and that's what dimpy is doing..showing gautam mirror.. unconditional support doesn't mean turning a blind eye..
posed a simple query...😃.. and it would be a decent thing if you could make me realize..why not calling out kids when they behave rudely, insult their own parents in public, don't support their own parents in public..is wrong?😳.. thnks in advance if you choose to enlighten me..
comment:
p_commentcount