Posted:
yes RSS is budding taliban , we may hide 1992 or 2002 under carpet but jai ho godse ji ki jai ho.
Originally posted by: blue-ice
Who says that I won't be tolerant??π...I am just saying that...if I can tolerate people of other religions if they are offended...I from now on am going to respect the feelings of the people of my religion too...after all Hinduism teaches tolerance so I can tolerate Hindus too if they r offended even if i don't agree with them...I am right now kind of feeling guilty of making fun of any Hindu who might have been offended by PK or any other religious movie
Originally posted by: Bazigar
so shall we compete with others that how much fanatic we can become π good carry on. maar dalo kaat dalo π
Originally posted by: blue-ice
Baazigar ji...if u read my first post...I have said it ...that as long as they are within their legal rights...and I am sure...other than in ISIS infested areas...maarna and kaatna doesn't come under anyone's legal rights...all I meant was that i am not going to call anyone a NUTCASE i they want to take legal action against a movie which has offended their religious feelings...that is all...
Originally posted by: bramcote46So one thread got closed and this thread turned into a hot bed for religious discussions .
For those who conveniently declare themselves to be peaceful is the joke of the century, why be an opportunist and prove yourself to be better , you or your faith is not under attack all the time so you can't really compare , and considering this fact the amount of bakwaas and criminal activities we get to hear by these saffron brigade is a joke , god forbid if there is ever an anti hindu wave for whatever reason then what will these guys do is unimaginable.
Originally posted by: blue-ice
Now this is a big problem...Just because Hinduism is not under attack all the time...the Hindus lose their right to be offended or they lose their rights to protest even in a legal way?...like by suing in the court against what they think is wrong...? I don't understand this mentality...NO ONE IS CONDONING VIOLENCE or ILLEGAL WAYS...but now even peaceful ways and legal use of their rights will also not be allowed??ReallY??
Originally posted by: Bazigar
so who attack hinduism ? why it survive till now ? shall we need all the bajdal, rss to save it ?
Originally posted by: Bazigar
hello what made u so agitated π legal provision is already is there , still with extra constitutional authority many books pulped aways, few movies banned on the same category recently. Few athiest even murdered recently in maharashtra. Hindu religion itself have part of antagonist, atheism etc. Issue is PK raise some question so we should put red tape on his mouth but the issue is Arjuna himself not only question but have doubt on krishna , may be if we were there we can apply blashphemy law π even those dhobi who question rama we will put traitor law. π forget ram rajya hack even if anyone dare to question current ruller bhaktas punce on them. πChalo whatever may be on movie we are having a more rigid cesor right now then what more u need. Shall we support the extra constitutional authority like who resort to threat to movie property .life etc. π
Originally posted by: blue-ice
Now this is a big problem...Just because Hinduism is not under attack all the time...the Hindus lose their right to be offended or they lose their rights to protest even in a legal way?...like by suing in the court against what they think is wrong...? I don't understand this mentality...NO ONE IS CONDONING VIOLENCE or ILLEGAL WAYS...but now even peaceful ways and legal use of their rights will also not be allowed??ReallY??
comment:
p_commentcount