Mahabharat

   

Mahabharat Episode Discussion Thread # 17 (Page 150)

Post Reply New Post

Page 150 of 150

Page 1 Page 149
Page   of 150

Arijit007

IF-Sizzlerz

Arijit007

Joined: 18 October 2012

Posts: 11037

Posted: 09 August 2014 at 11:14pm | IP Logged
well, i have only one thing to say, let's just wait and watch.

The following 4 member(s) liked the above post:

Uma90AnuMP-Shani-Sabhayata

Dear Guest, Being an unregistered member you are missing out on participating in the lively discussions happening on the topic "Mahabharat Episode Discussion Thread # 17 (Page 150)" in Mahabharat forum. In addition you lose out on the fun interactions with fellow members and other member exclusive features that India-Forums has to offer. Join India's most popular discussion portal on Indian Entertainment. It's FREE and registration is effortless so JOIN NOW!

KHUSHI-99

IF-Dazzler

KHUSHI-99

Joined: 23 March 2014

Posts: 3415

Posted: 09 August 2014 at 11:25pm | IP Logged
Originally posted by amritat

It was no war for "Samaj ka Kayan", atleast by the Pandavas. However, they did want their share of the land back, which they thought were rightfully theirs. And Draupadi's revenge honestly had no meaning. Yes, Draupadi wanted revenge, but her husbands didn't care. Yudisthir wanted to forget all insult of Draupadi in return of land. So, this Draupadi's revenge excuse, shown by the CVs is really getting irritating now.
It's only when Duryodhan refused the deal, that they waged war, and then remembered Draupadi's revenge.
If Duryodhan had accepted the peace-proposal, then Draupadi's "revenge" would have gone down the drains, and all those people who caused her insult would have lived on happy ever after. so, it's not Draupadi urge for revenge, but the Pandavas' urge to get back their land that caused the war.
This is my opinion.
Yes Yudhishthir sent the peace deal...moreover it was nothing like Krishna confirming that Dury would not accept it...A war for the throne has been turned in a 360 degree manner to make it war for samaj ka kalyan and Draupadi or rather only Draupadi's revenge...plus what is wrong if Pandavas or Yudhishthir wanted back the throne which they thought they were the rightfull heirs and same with Dury...

The following 3 member(s) liked the above post:

Uma90amritatSabhayata

amritat

Goldie

amritat

Joined: 16 March 2011

Posts: 1532

Posted: 10 August 2014 at 12:03am | IP Logged
Originally posted by KHUSHI-99

Originally posted by amritat

</strong>
<strong>
<font color="#cc0000">It was no war for "Samaj ka Kayan", atleast by the Pandavas. However, they did want their share of the land back, which they thought were rightfully theirs. And Draupadi's revenge honestly had no meaning. Yes, Draupadi wanted revenge, but her husbands didn't care. Yudisthir wanted to forget all insult of Draupadi in return of land. So, this Draupadi's revenge excuse, shown by theCVsis really getting irritating now.</font>

<font color="#cc0000">It's only when Duryodhan refused the deal, that they waged war, and then remembered Draupadi's revenge.</font>

<font color="#cc0000">If Duryodhan had accepted the peace-proposal, then Draupadi's "revenge" would have gone down the drains, and all those people who caused her insult would have lived on happy ever after. so, it's not Draupadi urge for revenge, but the Pandavas' urge to get back their land that caused the war.</font>

<font color="#cc0000">This is my opinion.</font>

Yes Yudhishthir sent the peace deal...moreover it was nothing like Krishna confirming that Dury would not accept it...A war for the throne has been turned in a 360 degree manner to make it war for samaj ka kalyan and Draupadi or rather only Draupadi's revenge...plus what is wrong if Pandavas or Yudhishthir wanted back the throne which they thought they were the rightfull heirs and same with Dury...


There's actually nothing wrong in fighting for one's rights. So, if seen that way, the Pandavas had reasons to wage war especially after they tried to send peace proposal. However, i just hate the way, the real motive of the Pandavas are camouflaged everywhere, n the whole blame is shifted on Draupadi. Being a fan of Draupadi it really pinches me to see how every rendition of Mahabharat tries to put it all on the shoulders of Draupadi...as if the war took place just bcoz she wantrd it. And as if,everything depended on wat she wanted, which is not true.

Edited by amritat - 10 August 2014 at 12:05am

The following 3 member(s) liked the above post:

viji2111Uma90Sabhayata

Arijit007

IF-Sizzlerz

Arijit007

Joined: 18 October 2012

Posts: 11037

Posted: 10 August 2014 at 1:35am | IP Logged
you know what, duryodhan was the main reason for the war.

The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:

Sabhayata

Post Reply New Post

Go to top

Related Topics

  Topics Topic Starter Replies Views Last Post
||Mahabharat - Help Desk||

2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 34 35

Proud-India 274 22875 3 days ago
By Pritam-Das
Mahabharat Episode Discussion Thread # 18

2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 150 151

mnx12 1201 40588 25 August 2014 at 11:10am
By riti4u
Mahabharat SBS Video Update 9th Aug 2014 Dhruvie 3 545 13 August 2014 at 1:15pm
By riyaroses
Mahabharat HD Video Update Eng Subs 9th Aug 2014 Dhruvie 1 249 10 August 2014 at 2:23am
By Surish
Mahabharat: Pandavas to be born in Mahabharat

2 3

mehta28 20 4518 09 October 2013 at 11:54pm
By mehta28

Forum Quick Jump

Forum Category

Active Forums

Mahabharat Topic Index

Limit search to this Forum only.

 

Disclaimer: All Logos and Pictures of various Channels, Shows, Artistes, Media Houses, Companies, Brands etc. belong to their respective owners, and are used to merely visually identify the Channels, Shows, Companies, Brands, etc. to the viewer. Incase of any issue please contact the webmaster.