Sports/Cricket

   

INDIA vs ENGLAND 3rd Test (Page 7)

Post Reply New Post

Page 7 of 75

sscomp32

IF-Sizzlerz

sscomp32

Joined: 07 August 2010

Posts: 22735

Posted: 27 July 2014 at 6:23am | IP Logged
Originally posted by -AdiLuvzNBT-

Originally posted by sscomp32

Originally posted by -AdiLuvzNBT-

Originally posted by sweetMonayaSanu

Originally posted by sscomp32

There is No rule Anu.
They made a like for like replacement.
Ashwin should have been in for Rohit. Sleepy

i know i know like for like but still i wish it was ashwin n not pankaj and yes Rohit shouldnt have played Rohit is not an allrounder naa how could they replace rohit with binny m confused 
binny is allrounder right Confused 

rohit sharma is experienced then binny and binny was not been used as a allrounder so rohit came in
Experienced? LOL Rohit 0 tests in England and Binny 2 tests in England. Binny was not useful so dropped. Ashwin was the perfect replacement because he can bat well and maybe better than Rohit sometimes and he is a specialist bowler. So we would have got 5 bowlers and 7 batsman too. Rohit should not have been in the team but India playing defensive and they added Rohit just to make sure we don't lose due to bad battingSleepy, but we all know what Rohit has done in SA/NZ. Rohit has to do something special here or else he will be another liability like Binny.

bhai compare there ODI number ! 
D'ohReally?
I thought there was a test match going on.
Please stop mixing formats. This is test cricket and you need bowlers here to take 20 wickets. ODI can be won by batsman but not tests.

Dear Guest, Being an unregistered member you are missing out on participating in the lively discussions happening on the topic "INDIA vs ENGLAND 3rd Test (Page 7)" in Sports/Cricket forum. In addition you lose out on the fun interactions with fellow members and other member exclusive features that India-Forums has to offer. Join India's most popular discussion portal on Indian Entertainment. It's FREE and registration is effortless so JOIN NOW!

-AdiLuvzNBT-

IF-Rockerz

-AdiLuvzNBT-

Joined: 02 June 2013

Posts: 5265

Posted: 27 July 2014 at 6:24am | IP Logged
Originally posted by sweetMonayaSanu

Originally posted by --SH7_Sunny--

yeah ankit ne diya yeh naam A LOL
ROFL ROFL aacha naam diya hai naa haha

AngryWink

-AdiLuvzNBT-

IF-Rockerz

-AdiLuvzNBT-

Joined: 02 June 2013

Posts: 5265

Posted: 27 July 2014 at 6:25am | IP Logged
Originally posted by sweetMonayaSanu

Originally posted by -AdiLuvzNBT-

Originally posted by sscomp32

Originally posted by -AdiLuvzNBT-

Originally posted by sweetMonayaSanu

Originally posted by sscomp32

There is No rule Anu.
They made a like for like replacement.
Ashwin should have been in for Rohit. Sleepy

i know i know like for like but still i wish it was ashwin n not pankaj and yes Rohit shouldnt have played Rohit is not an allrounder naa how could they replace rohit with binny m confused 
binny is allrounder right Confused 

rohit sharma is experienced then binny and binny was not been used as a allrounder so rohit came in
Experienced? LOL Rohit 0 tests in England and Binny 2 tests in England. Binny was not useful so dropped. Ashwin was the perfect replacement because he can bat well and maybe better than Rohit sometimes and he is a specialist bowler. So we would have got 5 bowlers and 7 batsman too. Rohit should not have been in the team but India playing defensive and they added Rohit just to make sure we don't lose due to bad battingSleepy, but we all know what Rohit has done in SA/NZ. Rohit has to do something special here or else he will be another liability like Binny.

bhai compare there ODI number ! 
but Adi we r talking abt Test naa they r playin test match or ODI 


rohit was not given change in test ! he plays ODI but dhoni did not trust him for test ! but now when he trusts him for test rohit is playing

-AdiLuvzNBT-

IF-Rockerz

-AdiLuvzNBT-

Joined: 02 June 2013

Posts: 5265

Posted: 27 July 2014 at 6:32am | IP Logged
i want rohit to play with vijay 

-Robin-

IF-Sizzlerz

-Robin-

Joined: 19 May 2012

Posts: 24270

Posted: 27 July 2014 at 6:38am | IP Logged
India is going to lose this match coz of defensive mindset and poor fielding in slips

The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:

sscomp32

sscomp32

IF-Sizzlerz

sscomp32

Joined: 07 August 2010

Posts: 22735

Posted: 27 July 2014 at 6:39am | IP Logged
Originally posted by -AdiLuvzNBT-

Originally posted by sweetMonayaSanu

Originally posted by -AdiLuvzNBT-

Originally posted by sscomp32

Originally posted by -AdiLuvzNBT-

Originally posted by sweetMonayaSanu

Originally posted by sscomp32

There is No rule Anu.
They made a like for like replacement.
Ashwin should have been in for Rohit. Sleepy

i know i know like for like but still i wish it was ashwin n not pankaj and yes Rohit shouldnt have played Rohit is not an allrounder naa how could they replace rohit with binny m confused 
binny is allrounder right Confused 

rohit sharma is experienced then binny and binny was not been used as a allrounder so rohit came in
Experienced? LOL Rohit 0 tests in England and Binny 2 tests in England. Binny was not useful so dropped. Ashwin was the perfect replacement because he can bat well and maybe better than Rohit sometimes and he is a specialist bowler. So we would have got 5 bowlers and 7 batsman too. Rohit should not have been in the team but India playing defensive and they added Rohit just to make sure we don't lose due to bad battingSleepy, but we all know what Rohit has done in SA/NZ. Rohit has to do something special here or else he will be another liability like Binny.

bhai compare there ODI number ! 
but Adi we r talking abt Test naa they r playin test match or ODI 


rohit was not given change in test ! he plays ODI but dhoni did not trust him for test ! but now when he trusts him for test rohit is playing
Because he is not fit for tests.Tests is not ODI/T20 that somebody scores a 200 in the flattest pitch in the world and people say he is the next big thing. After India tests v WI he was given chance in SA/NZ and he failed miserably there.  So why would he be given another chance. Kohli despite failures is given chances because he has scored 100's in every country not only in India like Rohit. Rohit does not give you guarantee than he will do well like Kohli does. Any reason why Kohli who has played the same amount of matches has much more runs than rohit? Because rohit has not donr justice to his talent in the last 6 years. In the same 6 years kohli has scored around 30 centuries and around 50 50's combined both ODI/T20.


Edited by sscomp32 - 27 July 2014 at 6:36am

-Robin-

IF-Sizzlerz

-Robin-

Joined: 19 May 2012

Posts: 24270

Posted: 27 July 2014 at 6:39am | IP Logged
Originally posted by sscomp32

Originally posted by -AdiLuvzNBT-

Originally posted by sscomp32

Originally posted by -AdiLuvzNBT-

Originally posted by sweetMonayaSanu

Originally posted by sscomp32

<font color="#0000FF" face="Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif" size="3">There is No rule Anu.
They made a like for like replacement.
Ashwin should have been in for Rohit. Sleepy</font>
i know i know like for like but still i wish it was ashwin n not pankaj and yes Rohit shouldnt have played Rohit is not an allrounder naa how could they replace rohit with binny m confused
binny is allrounder rightConfused

rohit sharma is experienced then binny and binny was not been used as a allrounder so rohit came in
<font color="#0000FF" face="Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif" size="3">Experienced? LOL Rohit 0 tests in England and Binny 2 tests in England. Binny was not useful so dropped. Ashwin was the perfect replacement because he can bat well and maybe better than Rohit sometimes and he is a specialist bowler. So we would have got 5 bowlers and 7 batsman too. Rohit should not have been in the team but India playing defensive and they added Rohit just to make sure we don't lose due to bad battingSleepy, but we all know what Rohit has done in SA/NZ. Rohit has to do something special here or else he will be another liability like Binny. </font>

bhai compare there ODI number !

<font color="#0000FF" face="Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif" size="3">D'ohReally?
I thought there was a test match going on.
Please stop mixing formats. This is test cricket and you need bowlers here to take 20 wic<font size="3">kets</font>. ODI can be won by batsman but not tests. </font>
Even in ODIs we have seen what RS can do in SA and NZ LOL

Edited by -Robin- - 27 July 2014 at 6:34am

The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:

sscomp32

Heart_Hacker-

IF-Stunnerz

Heart_Hacker-

Joined: 03 August 2010

Posts: 44886

Posted: 27 July 2014 at 6:40am | IP Logged
India going to lose this one now ..

Post Reply New Post

Go to top

Related Topics

  Topics Topic Starter Replies Views Last Post
India in WI (India Vs WI) Tour 2011- Discuss HERE safeplacetoland 0 576 04 June 2011 at 7:55am
By safeplacetoland
Yippeeee India got an ODI!!!*India Won* *Dakoo_Minzy* 8 1073 08 October 2007 at 3:06pm
By umi82990
England Vs Sri Lanka! England Wins WillSmith456 5 504 30 September 2007 at 12:11pm
By XxMadhurixX
India Vs Pakistan! India wins, Huge offer WillSmith456 3 1489 25 September 2007 at 2:01am
By farisss4
Zimbabave vs England....England wins! yay prithvi lover 2 546 14 September 2007 at 7:32am
By farisss4

Forum Quick Jump

Forum Category

Active Forums

Sports/Cricket Topic Index

Limit search to this Forum only.

 

Disclaimer: All Logos and Pictures of various Channels, Shows, Artistes, Media Houses, Companies, Brands etc. belong to their respective owners, and are used to merely visually identify the Channels, Shows, Companies, Brands, etc. to the viewer. Incase of any issue please contact the webmaster.