Sports/Cricket
Sports/Cricket

India-Forums

   

INDIA vs ENGLAND 3rd Test (Page 7)

BeingBlunt IF-Stunnerz
BeingBlunt
BeingBlunt

Joined: 07 August 2010
Posts: 27854

Posted: 27 July 2014 at 6:23am | IP Logged
Originally posted by -AdiLuvzNBT-

Originally posted by sscomp32

Originally posted by -AdiLuvzNBT-

Originally posted by sweetMonayaSanu

Originally posted by sscomp32

There is No rule Anu.
They made a like for like replacement.
Ashwin should have been in for Rohit. Sleepy

i know i know like for like but still i wish it was ashwin n not pankaj and yes Rohit shouldnt have played Rohit is not an allrounder naa how could they replace rohit with binny m confused 
binny is allrounder right Confused 

rohit sharma is experienced then binny and binny was not been used as a allrounder so rohit came in
Experienced? LOL Rohit 0 tests in England and Binny 2 tests in England. Binny was not useful so dropped. Ashwin was the perfect replacement because he can bat well and maybe better than Rohit sometimes and he is a specialist bowler. So we would have got 5 bowlers and 7 batsman too. Rohit should not have been in the team but India playing defensive and they added Rohit just to make sure we don't lose due to bad battingSleepy, but we all know what Rohit has done in SA/NZ. Rohit has to do something special here or else he will be another liability like Binny.

bhai compare there ODI number ! 
D'ohReally?
I thought there was a test match going on.
Please stop mixing formats. This is test cricket and you need bowlers here to take 20 wickets. ODI can be won by batsman but not tests.

-AdiLuvzNBT- IF-Rockerz
-AdiLuvzNBT-
-AdiLuvzNBT-

Joined: 02 June 2013
Posts: 6105

Posted: 27 July 2014 at 6:24am | IP Logged
Originally posted by sweetMonayaSanu

Originally posted by --SH7_Sunny--

yeah ankit ne diya yeh naam A LOL
ROFL ROFL aacha naam diya hai naa haha

AngryWink
-AdiLuvzNBT- IF-Rockerz
-AdiLuvzNBT-
-AdiLuvzNBT-

Joined: 02 June 2013
Posts: 6105

Posted: 27 July 2014 at 6:25am | IP Logged
Originally posted by sweetMonayaSanu

Originally posted by -AdiLuvzNBT-

Originally posted by sscomp32

Originally posted by -AdiLuvzNBT-

Originally posted by sweetMonayaSanu

Originally posted by sscomp32

There is No rule Anu.
They made a like for like replacement.
Ashwin should have been in for Rohit. Sleepy

i know i know like for like but still i wish it was ashwin n not pankaj and yes Rohit shouldnt have played Rohit is not an allrounder naa how could they replace rohit with binny m confused 
binny is allrounder right Confused 

rohit sharma is experienced then binny and binny was not been used as a allrounder so rohit came in
Experienced? LOL Rohit 0 tests in England and Binny 2 tests in England. Binny was not useful so dropped. Ashwin was the perfect replacement because he can bat well and maybe better than Rohit sometimes and he is a specialist bowler. So we would have got 5 bowlers and 7 batsman too. Rohit should not have been in the team but India playing defensive and they added Rohit just to make sure we don't lose due to bad battingSleepy, but we all know what Rohit has done in SA/NZ. Rohit has to do something special here or else he will be another liability like Binny.

bhai compare there ODI number ! 
but Adi we r talking abt Test naa they r playin test match or ODI 


rohit was not given change in test ! he plays ODI but dhoni did not trust him for test ! but now when he trusts him for test rohit is playing
-AdiLuvzNBT- IF-Rockerz
-AdiLuvzNBT-
-AdiLuvzNBT-

Joined: 02 June 2013
Posts: 6105

Posted: 27 July 2014 at 6:32am | IP Logged
i want rohit to play with vijay 
-Robin- IF-Stunnerz
-Robin-
-Robin-

Joined: 19 May 2012
Posts: 25678

Posted: 27 July 2014 at 6:38am | IP Logged
India is going to lose this match coz of defensive mindset and poor fielding in slips

The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:

BeingBlunt

BeingBlunt IF-Stunnerz
BeingBlunt
BeingBlunt

Joined: 07 August 2010
Posts: 27854

Posted: 27 July 2014 at 6:39am | IP Logged
Originally posted by -AdiLuvzNBT-

Originally posted by sweetMonayaSanu

Originally posted by -AdiLuvzNBT-

Originally posted by sscomp32

Originally posted by -AdiLuvzNBT-

Originally posted by sweetMonayaSanu

Originally posted by sscomp32

There is No rule Anu.
They made a like for like replacement.
Ashwin should have been in for Rohit. Sleepy

i know i know like for like but still i wish it was ashwin n not pankaj and yes Rohit shouldnt have played Rohit is not an allrounder naa how could they replace rohit with binny m confused 
binny is allrounder right Confused 

rohit sharma is experienced then binny and binny was not been used as a allrounder so rohit came in
Experienced? LOL Rohit 0 tests in England and Binny 2 tests in England. Binny was not useful so dropped. Ashwin was the perfect replacement because he can bat well and maybe better than Rohit sometimes and he is a specialist bowler. So we would have got 5 bowlers and 7 batsman too. Rohit should not have been in the team but India playing defensive and they added Rohit just to make sure we don't lose due to bad battingSleepy, but we all know what Rohit has done in SA/NZ. Rohit has to do something special here or else he will be another liability like Binny.

bhai compare there ODI number ! 
but Adi we r talking abt Test naa they r playin test match or ODI 


rohit was not given change in test ! he plays ODI but dhoni did not trust him for test ! but now when he trusts him for test rohit is playing
Because he is not fit for tests.Tests is not ODI/T20 that somebody scores a 200 in the flattest pitch in the world and people say he is the next big thing. After India tests v WI he was given chance in SA/NZ and he failed miserably there.  So why would he be given another chance. Kohli despite failures is given chances because he has scored 100's in every country not only in India like Rohit. Rohit does not give you guarantee than he will do well like Kohli does. Any reason why Kohli who has played the same amount of matches has much more runs than rohit? Because rohit has not donr justice to his talent in the last 6 years. In the same 6 years kohli has scored around 30 centuries and around 50 50's combined both ODI/T20.


Edited by sscomp32 - 27 July 2014 at 6:36am
-Robin- IF-Stunnerz
-Robin-
-Robin-

Joined: 19 May 2012
Posts: 25678

Posted: 27 July 2014 at 6:39am | IP Logged
Originally posted by sscomp32

Originally posted by -AdiLuvzNBT-

Originally posted by sscomp32

Originally posted by -AdiLuvzNBT-

Originally posted by sweetMonayaSanu

Originally posted by sscomp32

<font color="#0000FF" face="Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif" size="3">There is No rule Anu.
They made a like for like replacement.
Ashwin should have been in for Rohit. Sleepy</font>
i know i know like for like but still i wish it was ashwin n not pankaj and yes Rohit shouldnt have played Rohit is not an allrounder naa how could they replace rohit with binny m confused
binny is allrounder rightConfused

rohit sharma is experienced then binny and binny was not been used as a allrounder so rohit came in
<font color="#0000FF" face="Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif" size="3">Experienced? LOL Rohit 0 tests in England and Binny 2 tests in England. Binny was not useful so dropped. Ashwin was the perfect replacement because he can bat well and maybe better than Rohit sometimes and he is a specialist bowler. So we would have got 5 bowlers and 7 batsman too. Rohit should not have been in the team but India playing defensive and they added Rohit just to make sure we don't lose due to bad battingSleepy, but we all know what Rohit has done in SA/NZ. Rohit has to do something special here or else he will be another liability like Binny. </font>

bhai compare there ODI number !

<font color="#0000FF" face="Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif" size="3">D'ohReally?
I thought there was a test match going on.
Please stop mixing formats. This is test cricket and you need bowlers here to take 20 wic<font size="3">kets</font>. ODI can be won by batsman but not tests. </font>
Even in ODIs we have seen what RS can do in SA and NZ LOL

Edited by -Robin- - 27 July 2014 at 6:34am

The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:

BeingBlunt

Heart_Hacker- IF-Stunnerz
Heart_Hacker-
Heart_Hacker-

Joined: 03 August 2010
Posts: 46880

Posted: 27 July 2014 at 6:40am | IP Logged
India going to lose this one now ..

Go to top

Related Topics

  Topics Author Replies Views Last Post
India in WI (India Vs WI) Tour 2011- Discuss HERE

Author: safeplacetoland   Replies: 0   Views: 610

safeplacetoland 0 610 04 June 2011 at 7:55am by safeplacetoland
Yippeeee India got an ODI!!!*India Won*

Author: *Dakoo_Minzy*   Replies: 8   Views: 1116

*Dakoo_Minzy* 8 1116 08 October 2007 at 3:06pm by umi82990
England Vs Sri Lanka! England Wins

Author: WillSmith456   Replies: 5   Views: 534

WillSmith456 5 534 30 September 2007 at 12:11pm by XxMadhurixX
India Vs Pakistan! India wins, Huge offer

Author: WillSmith456   Replies: 3   Views: 1562

WillSmith456 3 1562 25 September 2007 at 2:01am by farisss4
Zimbabave vs England....England wins! yay

Author: prithvi lover   Replies: 2   Views: 580

prithvi lover 2 580 14 September 2007 at 7:32am by farisss4

Forum Quick Jump

Forum Category / Channels
Forums

Sports/Cricket Topic Index

Disclaimer: All Logos and Pictures of various Channels, Shows, Artistes, Media Houses, Companies, Brands etc. belong to their respective owners, and are used to merely visually identify the Channels, Shows, Companies, Brands, etc. to the viewer. Incase of any issue please contact the webmaster.

Popular Channels :
Star Plus | Zee TV | Sony TV | Colors TV | SAB TV | Life OK

Quick Links :
Top 100 TV Celebrities | Top 100 Bollywood Celebs | About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | Forum Index