Who looks best? - Page 5

Created

Last reply

Replies

81

Views

7330

Users

31

Likes

179

Frequent Posters

shilpishona thumbnail
Anniversary 12 Thumbnail Group Promotion 3 Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago

Originally posted by: Akdhaparijatluv



I dint talk abt storyline or char... In three hours mve obviously they show strong char of akdha n mve is only abt jodha n akbar... I also want strong char of jodha lik in initial days who gave back to rukayya n mahamanga n they can't even open their mouth infront of Jo... Same with jalal I need intelligent jalal who knows abt plans of Maham adham sharif Mali... Keeping char apart stil I adore parijat as akdha... They created magic with their chemistry in this one year... Parijat is akdha n akdha is parijat...

exactly this is wht I wnt to say,,,, both JOJA role ws fav in initial day wid RT&PS... both look royal, classy, gorgeous,,, now both the charctrs aura have gone,,, now nt RT nt PS looks royal in thr role... 🀒 bt only fr this we cant say,, RT jallu is nt as good as HR,,, same as PARI...
Agar hum RT k jallu ko consider kar sakte hain why always thr is a problem wid PARI...
Sandhya.A thumbnail
Anniversary 10 Thumbnail Group Promotion 6 Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
Anisha
We're not talking of characters at all. Now both Jalal and Jodha are messed up. Just the portrayal. Though both are good looking actresses,   Ash  looks elegant and queenly.


The very fact people want to be compared to Ash time and again and reassured that their fav is equally good or even better than her itself shows Ash's class. Also if you have observed,  for all comparisons between the two Jodhas, Hrithik and Rajat are hardly compared because both are classy in their own styles. 
ghalibmirza thumbnail
Anniversary 11 Thumbnail Group Promotion 6 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 9 years ago

Originally posted by: Sandhya.A

Anisha

We're not talking of characters at all. Now both Jalal and Jodha are messed up. Just the portrayal. Though both are good looking actresses,   Ash  looks elegant and queenly.


The very fact people want to be compared to Ash time and again and reassured that their fav is equally good or even better than her itself shows Ash's class. Also if you have observed,  for all comparisons between the two Jodhas, Hrithik and Rajat are hardly compared because both are classy in their own styles. 



well said sandhyaπŸ‘
Rak014 thumbnail
Anniversary 10 Thumbnail Group Promotion 5 Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago

Originally posted by: Sandhya.A

Anisha

We're not talking of characters at all. Now both Jalal and Jodha are messed up. Just the portrayal. Though both are good looking actresses,   Ash  looks elegant and queenly.


The very fact people want to be compared to Ash time and again and reassured that their fav is equally good or even better than her itself shows Ash's class. Also if you have observed,  for all comparisons between the two Jodhas, Hrithik and Rajat are hardly compared because both are classy in their own styles. 

If we think the other way round, pari is frequently compared to ash beacuse she is a strong competitor to ash in potraying jo!😊
ghalibmirza thumbnail
Anniversary 11 Thumbnail Group Promotion 6 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 9 years ago

Originally posted by: Rak014

If we think the other way round, pari is frequently compared to ash beacuse she is a strong competitor to ash in potraying jo!😊



jodha's character is simple and basic and is similar..whether aish portrays or pari, its just jodha that was perfect in every sense..and its much easier to play a positive character with no twists and turns!..now here is the twist raja's jalal had a very different portrayal as compared to hrithik's akbar..HR's akbar was not shown to be ruthless in initial stages and he just had one wife whereas rajat's jalal had so many different shades highlighting his characterization from being ruthless to becoming akbar and they were very well portrayed by rajat, therefore there is no comparison because characterization has been different!
NutellaWaffle thumbnail
Visit Streak 365 0 Thumbnail Anniversary 10 Thumbnail + 8
Posted: 9 years ago

Originally posted by: anisha222

exactly this is wht I wnt to say,,,, both JOJA role ws fav in initial day wid RT&PS... both look royal, classy, gorgeous,,, now both the charctrs aura have gone,,, now nt RT nt PS looks royal in thr role... 🀒 bt only fr this we cant say,, RT jallu is nt as good as HR,,, same as PARI...
Agar hum RT k jallu ko consider kar sakte hain why always thr is a problem wid PARI...



Yes that's y based on their char we can't tel as there is inconsistency in that... But the royal ness of Jo n jal was perfectly portrayed by parijat... No doubt in that... Pari looks royal gorgeous as perfect rajvanshi princess look
ChupChupKe thumbnail
Anniversary 12 Thumbnail Group Promotion 6 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 9 years ago

Originally posted by: Rak014

If we think the other way round, pari is frequently compared to ash beacuse she is a strong competitor to ash in potraying jo!😊

 
Very Well Said πŸ‘ 
Edited by ...SoniSona.... - 9 years ago
NutellaWaffle thumbnail
Visit Streak 365 0 Thumbnail Anniversary 10 Thumbnail + 8
Posted: 9 years ago

Originally posted by: mandyg



jodha's character is simple and basic and is similar..whether aish portrays or pari, its just jodha that was perfect in every sense..and its much easier to play a positive character with no twists and turns!..now here is the twist raja's jalal had a very different portrayal as compared to hrithik's akbar..HR's akbar was not shown to be ruthless in initial stages and he just had one wife whereas rajat's jalal had so many different shades highlighting his characterization from being ruthless to becoming akbar and they were very well portrayed by rajat, therefore there is no comparison because characterization has been different!



Jodha char is not simple... Aish Jo had neither ghrina for jalal nor wanting for his head lik in initial days... Aish Jo was soft natured royal princess through out movie... Pari portrayed both ghrina n present soft natured person perfectly... Not only jalal char even Jo char has different shades in ghrina n non ghrina phase how much ever jodha role is perfect...
NutellaWaffle thumbnail
Visit Streak 365 0 Thumbnail Anniversary 10 Thumbnail + 8
Posted: 9 years ago

Originally posted by: Rak014

If we think the other way round, pari is frequently compared to ash beacuse she is a strong competitor to ash in potraying jo!😊



πŸ‘πŸΌ
ghalibmirza thumbnail
Anniversary 11 Thumbnail Group Promotion 6 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 9 years ago

Originally posted by: Akdhaparijatluv



Jodha char is not simple... Aish Jo had neither ghrina for jalal nor wanting for his head lik in initial days... Aish Jo was soft natured royal princess through out movie... Pari portrayed both ghrina n present soft natured person perfectly... Not only jalal char even Jo char has different shades in ghrina n non ghrina phase how much ever jodha role is perfect...



ekta's jodha is her cliched heroine..aish also played the ghrina mode but in a more subtle and graceful way!