Mahabharat

India-Forums

   
Mahabharat
Mahabharat

StarBharat Panchali's Patiyogita (p.142: Yuddhi 10+ Ahead) (Page 134)

guenhwyvar IF-Rockerz
guenhwyvar
guenhwyvar

Joined: 06 November 2010
Posts: 5093

Posted: 23 March 2014 at 12:51pm | IP Logged
Congratz Arjun!!

Here's his dialogue with Praiya Patni Panchaali trying to tell her why he had to do what he had to do ...

Watch in 1080p for a mind-blowing experience LOL
 

ugh i always have troubles with the YT BB code... oh lol ... https doesn't work .. it has to be http...


Edited by shyam09 - 23 March 2014 at 1:17pm

The following 10 member(s) liked the above post:

devashree_h.Sparkler.lexy_rixSabhayata.FairyDust.bheegiAnjanaYYZBeingBlunt....Poojie....--Royal--

guenhwyvar IF-Rockerz
guenhwyvar
guenhwyvar

Joined: 06 November 2010
Posts: 5093

Posted: 23 March 2014 at 1:20pm | IP Logged
I'm going to laugh so hard and roflmao if Yuddhi turns out to be the SoW and PoW next week!
Knowing the CVs this is probably going to be expected 

The following 6 member(s) liked the above post:

devashree_hlexy_rixSabhayataAnjanaYYZBeingBlunt....Poojie....

Sabhayata IF-Sizzlerz
Sabhayata
Sabhayata

Joined: 09 August 2013
Posts: 10449

Posted: 23 March 2014 at 1:21pm | IP Logged
@Shyam:Thanks for the video i love arjuna in this scene he just couldnt take his eyes off panchali .He was glued to her.

@Shani:Yes next few weeks should be interesting for this pratiyogita i view it as the world cup for this pratiyogitaLOL






Edited by Sabhayata - 23 March 2014 at 1:20pm

The following 5 member(s) liked the above post:

devashree_hlexy_rixAnjanaYYZBeingBlunt....Poojie....

AnjanaYYZ IF-Stunnerz
AnjanaYYZ
AnjanaYYZ

Joined: 26 September 2008
Posts: 28384

Posted: 23 March 2014 at 1:35pm | IP Logged
Staking of Draupadi & Consequences:  We have a few schematic options about negative marking.  Please select the one that you prefer.  Selection must happen before event of Draupadi Staking.  
We have discussed this ALOT.  And I have tried to come up with options reflecting the following principles:
  • Chauser (dice game) was an accepted activity for kings at the time.  Staking one's wife and or brothers, however, was not.
  • This is only about Patis regard for Panchali so we cannot deduct for staking anyone other then Panchali.    
  • I don't think it was common protocol for Princesses or Queens to be in the dicehall so Panchali's exclusion should not garner negative points. Am willing to be convinced otherwise if it was common for them to part of such games.  
  • Nakul & Sahdev don't have much points to lose and we don't want them eliminated from the patiyogita.
  • Patis who VERBALLY object to the staking or to vastraharan should be credited.  
  • Staking Panchali, not objecting to it, and not objecting to her subsequent vastraharan is more reprehensible than marriage to another woman.
  • Arjuna, Yuddhi, Bheem got one point for objecting to D's insult in Rajsabha before.
  • A Mark will be deducted from any pati who stops (verbally or non-verball) another pati from objecting.
  • A Mark will be awarded for any non-verbal support, sympathetic looks, objections, shameful looks.
4 Possible Deduction Schemes:
You can vote if you are IF Member.  Deadline is Staking of Draupadi.
OPTION A: 
  • Staking Draupadi is -5, Not objecting to her staking is -3, Not objecting to her vastaharan is -3, Not objecting to other insults to her is -1;
  • Objecting to her staking or vastraharan is +2, Objecting to other insults is +1, Prans to kill/harm her those who insult her +2, consoling/Apology to her +1;
  • Negative marks won't exceed Zero Threshold (no pati will end with marks below zero any day).  
OPTION B:
  • Staking Draupadi is -3, Not objecting to her staking is -2, Not objecting to her vastaharan is -2, Not objecting to other insults to her is -1;
  • Objecting to her staking or vastraharan is +3, Objecting to other insults is +1, Prans to kill/harm her those who insult her +2, consoling/apologizing +1;
  • Negative marks won't exceed Point Three Threshold (no pati will end with marks below 3 marks any day). 
OPTION C - Percentage of Mark they have before Draupadi is staked
  • Staking Draupadi is 10%, Not objecting to her staking is 5%, Not objecting to her vastaharan is 5%, Not objecting to other insults to her is -1;
  • Objecting to her staking or vastraharan is +3, Objecting to other insults is +1, Prans to kill/harm her those who insult her +2, consoling/apologizing +1;
  • Negative marks won't exceed Zero Threshold (no pati will end with marks below Zero Marks any day). 
OPTION D -Percentage of Mark they have before Draupadi is staked
  • Staking Draupadi is 5%, Not objecting to her staking is 3%, Not objecting to her vastaharan is 3%, Not objecting to other insults to her is -1;
  • Objecting to her staking or vastraharan is +3, Objecting to other insults is +1, Prans to kill/harm her those who insult her +2, consoling/apologizing +1;
  • Negative marks won't exceed Three Threshold (no pati will end with marks below Three Marks at any day). 


Edited by AnjanaYYZ - 23 March 2014 at 4:03pm

The following 5 member(s) liked the above post:

devashree_hlexy_rixSabhayataBeingBlunt....Poojie....

lexy_rix IF-Rockerz
lexy_rix
lexy_rix

Joined: 09 July 2013
Posts: 6242

Posted: 23 March 2014 at 1:57pm | IP Logged
Originally posted by AnjanaYYZ

Staking of Draupadi & Consequences:  We have a few schematic options about negative marking.  Please select the one that you prefer.  Selection must happen before event of Draupadi Staking.  
We have discussed this ALOT.  And I have tried to come up with options reflecting the following principles:
  • Chauser (dice game) was an accepted activity for kings at the time.  Staking one's wife and or brothers, however, was not. I agree completely...Thumbs Up
  • This is only about Patis regard for Panchali so we cannot deduct for staking anyone other then Panchali. Fair enough...Smile
  • I don't think it was common protocol for Princesses or Queens to be in the dicehall so Panchali's exclusion should not garner negative points. Am willing to be convinced otherwise if it was common for them to part of such games. Granted. Okay, I'll give THAT much allowance to Yudi...
  • Nakul & Sahdev don't have much points to lose and we don't want them eliminated from the patiyogita. So, no negative marking for them if patniji gets staked and they themselves don't object? Okay...oh, but I'm hoping that at least one of them does object in StarBharat *fingers crossed* - too optimistic? LOL
  • Patis who object to the staking or to vastraharan should be credited. Absolutely YES.
  • Staking Panchali, not objecting to it, and not objecting to her subsequent vastraharan is more reprehensible than marriage to another woman. Yes, and I believe all those marriages may be done with...I mean, Arjuna could get that negative marking for that chakravyuh lesson with Subhi, and that could be THE last bit of negative marking for spending time with the 'other' wife...
  • Arjuna, Yuddhi, Bheem got one point for objecting to D's insult in Rajsabha before. And, does that really affect the way they will be scored during vastraharan? In other words, will they suffer from a penalty of ONLY one point for NOT objecting to the insult in this situation?
4 Possible Deduction Schemes:
You can vote if you are IF Member.  Deadline is Staking of Draupadi.
OPTION A: 
  • Staking Draupadi is -5, Not objecting to her staking is -3, Not objecting to her vastaharan is -3, Not objecting to other insults to her is -1; 
  • Objecting to her staking or vastraharan is +2, Objecting to other insults is +1, Prans to kill/harm her those who insult her +1, consoling/Apology to her +1;
  • Negative marks won't exceed Zero Threshold (no pati will end with marks below zero any day).  
This would be my option...


Edited by shani88 - 23 March 2014 at 2:09pm

The following 2 member(s) liked the above post:

SabhayataBeingBlunt

AnjanaYYZ IF-Stunnerz
AnjanaYYZ
AnjanaYYZ

Joined: 26 September 2008
Posts: 28384

Posted: 23 March 2014 at 2:06pm | IP Logged
@Shani - sorry I made a mistake on Option C its - Zero Mark threshold so not less than Zero.  I need you to pick one option.  
- Your other ques:
- NakSah are going to get negative marks...the only protection they have is the Zero or 3 Point threshold.  Percentage marking may also be gentler on them vis a vis Y,A, B who have much more t o lose.
- Draupadi might well have objected to her staking or that of Yuddhi & Bros, but that is speculative here...we don't know the answer and should not assume it.  Let's go with what will be shown/known.
-Marking of insults should be consistent with what has happened before.  What is excess here compared to Rajyasabha is the Vastraharan & staking so the negative marking for that can and will be more.

The following 3 member(s) liked the above post:

lexy_rixSabhayata....Poojie....

lexy_rix IF-Rockerz
lexy_rix
lexy_rix

Joined: 09 July 2013
Posts: 6242

Posted: 23 March 2014 at 2:12pm | IP Logged
Originally posted by AnjanaYYZ

@Shani - sorry I made a mistake on Option C its - Zero Mark threshold so not less than Zero.  I need you to pick one option.  
- Your other ques:
- NakSah are going to get negative marks...the only protection they have is the Zero or 3 Point threshold.  Percentage marking may also be gentler on them vis a vis Y,A, B who have much more t o lose.
- Draupadi might well have objected to her staking or that of Yuddhi & Bros, but that is speculative here...we don't know the answer and should not assume it.  Let's go with what will be shown/known.
-Marking of insults should be consistent with what has happened before.  What is excess here compared to Rajyasabha is the Vastraharan & staking so the negative marking for that can and will be more.


Edited my previous post...and I agree with your points. Thumbs Up

The following 2 member(s) liked the above post:

SabhayataAnjanaYYZ

Sabhayata IF-Sizzlerz
Sabhayata
Sabhayata

Joined: 09 August 2013
Posts: 10449

Posted: 23 March 2014 at 2:20pm | IP Logged
Originally posted by AnjanaYYZ

4 Possible Deduction Schemes:
You can vote if you are IF Member.  Deadline is Staking of Draupadi.
OPTION A: 
  • Staking Draupadi is -5, Not objecting to her staking is -3, Not objecting to her vastaharan is -3, Not objecting to other insults to her is -1;Want to understand what objecting means here a simple nod of the head or disagreeable look while yudi is staking her will be considered as an objection.I think we should have separate marks for verbal and non verbal objections.And even if they object non verbally like in terms of looks at end of the day none of the pratiyogis's did anything considerable enough to stop her staking hence yudi should get the max blame for it but other pati's also need to be blamed.I am ok with -5 for staking her but -3 for other pati's for not doing anything significant enough to stop yudi.After that for any non verbal protest  +1 and for any verbal protest +3 .Same goes for vastaraharan .I guess what i am trying to say is that -5 to yudi and - 3 to other pratiyogis for staking Drauapdi and -3 for vastarahran should automatically happen despite their protest or objections because clearly their protests or objection weren't  strong enough to stop either of these things .despite the protest they did fail her and it should reflect in our marking hence all these negative points should automatically happen then we can give the positive points for any objections and like said there should be a difference in verbal and non verbal objections
  • Objecting to her staking or vastraharan is +2, Objecting to other insults is +1, Prans to kill/harm her those who insult her +1, consoling/Apology to her +1;
  • i think any kind of support to Draupadi in terms verbal objections should get a+3 wehther it be objection to her insults or prans or vastaraharan.We give a +1 for 1 second eyelock definately any kind of support  to her during her most distressed time should get more marks than that .Larger the magnitude of the event and scale of panchali's disgrace larger a pratiyogi should get for any kind of support to her .Like i said non verbal support a +1 and verbal support a +3.yes but after the whole incident any consoling and apology should get +1
  • Negative marks won't exceed Zero Threshold (no pati will end with marks below zero any day).  agreed

Another suggestion sorryLOL i think we should give negative points to pratiyogis for stopping other pratIyogi from protesting.Like a -3 or -2 like if a pati is about object and other pati holds him back that pati should get a negative point

OPTION B:
  • Staking Draupadi is -3, Not objecting to her staking is -2, Not objecting to her vastaharan is -2, Not objecting to other insults to her is -1;
  • Objecting to her staking or vastraharan is +3, Objecting to other insults is +1, Prans to kill/harm her those who insult her +2, consoling/apologizing +1;
  • Negative marks won't exceed Point Three Threshold (no pati will end with marks below 3 marks any day). 
OPTION C - Percentage of Mark they have before Draupadi is staked
  • Staking Draupadi is 10%, Not objecting to her staking is 5%, Not objecting to her vastaharan is 5%, Not objecting to other insults to her is -1;
  • Objecting to her staking or vastraharan is +3, Objecting to other insults is +1, Prans to kill/harm her those who insult her +2, consoling/apologizing +1;
  • Negative marks won't exceed Zero Threshold (no pati will end with marks below Five Marks any day). 
OPTION D -Percentage of Mark they have before Draupadi is staked
  • Staking Draupadi is 5%, Not objecting to her staking is 3%, Not objecting to her vastaharan is 3%, Not objecting to other insults to her is -1;
  • Objecting to her staking or vastraharan is +3, Objecting to other insults is +1, Prans to kill/harm her those who insult her +2, consoling/apologizing +1;
  • Negative marks won't exceed Three Threshold (no pati will end with marks below Three Marks at any day). 

Some suggestion and questions in red

I wont personally go in for option C and D becuase it is % wise this will be unfoair to pratiyogi's who currently have high marks .For example if we go by not objecting to her staking as % the actual marks deducted for arjuna will be higher than Bheema since currently he has higher marks which i think isnt fair for the same activity done by them hence positives and negatives must be in absolute number no one should suffer because they have performed well till now mainly for Yudi and arjuna since they are way higher than other pratiyogi's


Edited by Sabhayata - 23 March 2014 at 2:34pm

The following 4 member(s) liked the above post:

srishtisinghlexy_rix...Diala...AnjanaYYZ

Go to top

Related Topics

  Topics Author Replies Views Last Post
Ultimate Villain in StarBharat is Kunti, Karna, Dury,...

2 3

Author: AnjanaYYZ   Replies: 22   Views: 3069

AnjanaYYZ 22 3069 18 March 2014 at 7:02pm by AnjanaYYZ
Krishnarjun in starbharat???

2

Author: -kri-   Replies: 10   Views: 1442

-kri- 10 1442 03 March 2014 at 9:16am by mnx12
Gods of starbharat!! ;)

Author: Shriya95   Replies: 6   Views: 975

Shriya95 6 975 02 March 2014 at 4:07am by Shriya95
Drupada: Starbharat's twisted sequel of 'Priyamvada'

2 3 4

Author: PurpleRiot   Replies: 31   Views: 4074

PurpleRiot 31 4074 18 February 2014 at 3:26am by Manzz
Starbharat NOT Mahabharat!

2 3

Author: segad   Replies: 21   Views: 2965

segad 21 2965 19 December 2013 at 8:35am by -sayeed-

Forum Quick Jump

Forum Category / Channels
Forums

Mahabharat Topic Index

Check these Celebrity also

Disclaimer: All Logos and Pictures of various Channels, Shows, Artistes, Media Houses, Companies, Brands etc. belong to their respective owners, and are used to merely visually identify the Channels, Shows, Companies, Brands, etc. to the viewer. Incase of any issue please contact the webmaster.

Popular Channels :
Star Plus | Zee TV | Sony TV | Colors TV | SAB TV | Life OK

Quick Links :
Top 100 TV Celebrities | Top 100 Bollywood Celebs | About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | Forum Index