Harry Potter

   

The TRUTH behind the JKR"Wonderland"interview

Post Reply New Post

Page 1 of 2

Page 1
Page   of 2
Page 2 Page 2

bookworm-ALS--

IF-Stunnerz

bookworm-ALS--

Joined: 31 August 2011

Posts: 29271

Posted: 10 February 2014 at 2:44am | IP Logged

Five days ago, the Sunday Times previewed an interview of Harry Potter author J.K. Rowling, conducted by actress Emma Watson and published today in this quarter'sWonderland magazine. In their preview, the Times suggested that J.K. Rowling confesses her disapproval for her pairing of Ron Weasley and Hermione Granger in the series's final installment. Furthermore, the Times alleged that Rowling states Hermione would have been better suited to finally end up in a relationship with the hero of the series, Harry Potter.

Since the Times article ("JK admits Hermione should have wed Harry" by Claudia Croft) appeared, a flame has been ignited among readers of the Potter books. This apparent backtrack by Jo on such an important character pairing evoked great emotion from all sides, and old arguments (both for and against a Harry/Hermione relationship) were revived, no thanks to additional sensationalist journalism inside and outside of the Potter fandom. Without the actual interview from Wonderland being available until today, nothing was known regarding the context from which the Timesarticle's sparse quotations were taken. It was simply impossible to determine what was actually said, by JKR or Emma. In spite of this, reports that fed on the Times'sinsinuations continued to show up across the web, including on CNNThe IndependentThe TelegraphBBCThe Hollywood Reporter, and The Washington Post.

We are pleased to report MuggleNet has now read the final article in Wonderland, and in this post we will be assessing exactly what is true and isn't. Below are actual quotes from the Wonderland article. While at first glance, things do not look good for Ron and Hermione, we urge you to continue reading.

On the character of Hermione, Rowling says:
"I know that Hermione is incredibly recognisable to a lot of readers, and yet you don't see a lot of Hermiones in film or on TV except to be laughed at. I mean that the intense, clever, in some ways not terribly self-aware, girl is rarely the heroine, and I really wanted her to be the heroine. She is part of me, although she is not wholly me. I think that is how I might have appeared to people when I was younger, but that is not really how I was inside."

This leads into a quote from the Times article where J.K. Rowling calls Ron and Hermione's relationship "wish fulfillment." By this she means that she was fulfilling the desire for her Hermione character to find happiness.

Subsequently, on the Ron/Hermione relationship, J.K. Rowling states:
"It was a young relationship. I think the attraction itself is plausible but the combative side of it... I'm not sure you could have got over that in an adult relationship; there was too much fundamental incompatibility."

Here is what she says about Harry/Hermione:
"In some ways Hermione and Harry are a better fit, and I'll tell you something very strange. When I wrote Hallows, I felt this quite strongly when I had Hermione and Harry together in the tent! I hadn't told [Steve] Kloves that, and when he wrote the script he felt exactly the same thing at exactly the same point. [...] And actually I liked that scene in the film because it was articulating something I hadn't said, but I had felt. I really liked it, and I thought that it was right. I think you do feel the ghost of what could have been in that scene. [...] And you got it perfectly [in acting it]; you got perfectly the sort of mixture of awkwardness and genuine emotion because it teeters on the edge of 'what are we doing?' [and] 'Oh, come on, let's do it anyway', which I thought was just right for that time."

Regarding Ron's position when he left Harry and Hermione:
"Hermione was the one [who] stuck with Harry all the way through that last installment, that very last part of the adventure. It wasn't Ron, which also says something very powerful about Ron. He was injured in a way, in his self-esteem, from the start of the series. He always knew he came second to fourth best and then had to make friends with the hero of it all, and that's a hell of a position to be in, eternally overshadowed. So Ron had to act out in that way at some point."

The discussion regarding Harry and Hermione stops here, and this is the part of the interview where everything that has been said so far is turned around and returned toward a Ron/Hermione favor.

Rowling states: 
"Oh, maybe she and Ron will be all right with a bit of counseling, you know. I wonder what happens at wizard marriage counseling? They'll probably be fine. He needs to work on his self-esteem issues, and she needs to work on being a little less critical. [...] Ron's used to playing second fiddle. I think that's a comfortable role for him, but at a certain point he has to be his own man, doesn't he?"

Emma responds, "Yes, and until he does it is unresolved. It is unfinished business. So maybe life presented this to him enough times until he had to make a choice and become the man that Hermione needs."

Rowling replies, "Just like her creator, she has a real weakness for a funny man. These uptight girls, they do like them funny."

Emma adds, "They do like them funny; they need them funny."

Rowling agrees, "It's such a relief from being so intense yourself - you need someone who takes life, or appears to take life, a little more light heartedly."

WHAT DOES IT ALL MEAN? Well, in our view, all J.K. Rowling has admitted was to feeling that the scene in the tent was a shared vulnerable moment between two characters that revealed an intriguing degree of compatibility between each of them, emotionally. In saying that Ron needed to get over his self-doubt, Rowling is mentioning a key component that readers would agree could certainly cause some trouble in an adult relationship. However, by the article's end, Rowling and Watson have both found a value in Ron that Harry doesn't possess: Ron's humor and his ability to level Hermione's character. Thus, for all of this talk, the result is that the characters end up safely nestled where they were before, inside the canon of thePotter books.

FULL TEXT of the Wonderland article can be found here.



Credit : Mugglenet.com

The following 3 member(s) liked the above post:

CutecjiluvOriginals--Mahima--

Dear Guest, Being an unregistered member you are missing out on participating in the lively discussions happening on the topic "The TRUTH behind the JKR"Wonderland"interview" in Harry Potter forum. In addition you lose out on the fun interactions with fellow members and other member exclusive features that India-Forums has to offer. Join India's most popular discussion portal on Indian Entertainment. It's FREE and registration is effortless so JOIN NOW!

iluvOriginals

IF-Sizzlerz

iluvOriginals

Joined: 25 September 2008

Posts: 15440

Posted: 12 February 2014 at 12:34am | IP Logged
So Jo didn't actually said THOSE words

The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:

bookworm-ALS--

bookworm-ALS--

IF-Stunnerz

bookworm-ALS--

Joined: 31 August 2011

Posts: 29271

Posted: 12 February 2014 at 2:00am | IP Logged
Originally posted by iluvOriginals

So Jo didn't actually said THOSE words

Nope! The muggle Rita Skeeters did that.LOL

The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:

iluvOriginals

mannu_minnie

IF-Rockerz

mannu_minnie

Joined: 24 February 2011

Posts: 8050

Posted: 12 February 2014 at 4:45am | IP Logged
Originally posted by bookworm-ALS--

Originally posted by iluvOriginals

So Jo didn't actually said THOSE words

Nope! The muggle Rita Skeeters did that.LOL
LOL
there was an editorial review on that statement in Indian Expres also. i will post it.

The following 2 member(s) liked the above post:

iluvOriginalsbookworm-ALS--

mannu_minnie

IF-Rockerz

mannu_minnie

Joined: 24 February 2011

Posts: 8050

Posted: 12 February 2014 at 4:47am | IP Logged

Ship-wrecked



Rowling's Harry Potter revisionism sparks questions about authorial intent and reader interpretation.

In his postscript to The Name of the Rose, Umberto Eco notes that a "narrator should not supply interpretations of his work; otherwise he would not have written a novel". Perhaps J.K. Rowling, creator of Harry Potter and pseudonymous crime fiction, should have got that memo.

When, in excerpts from an interview published in Wonderland magazine, Rowling appeared to question the sanctity of the Ron-Hermione "ship", she set off a firestorm within the Harry Potter fandom of a kind not seen since George Lucas explained that Greedo did shoot first " and then went back to the source material in Star Wars and edited the scene, and Han Solo's character, for posterity.

Rowling's interview with Emma Watson, the actress who portrayed Hermione in the films, was her most direct salvo in the so-called shipping wars (derived from "relationship" to refer to a romantic pairing) that all but overtook the Harry Potter fandom several years ago, when it became apparent that Ron and Hermione were, indeed, a thing. The Harry-Hermione proponents went so far as to accuse Rowling of failing to understand her own characters.

But now, with Rowling's admission that Ron and Hermione happened "for reasons that have very little to do with literature and far more to do with me clinging to the plot as I first imagined it", they've had the last laugh. Or have they? It turns out that Rowling, aware she was committing "Potter heresy", was a bit more circumspect; she acknowledged that the Granger-Weasleys would "probably be fine".

The virulence of the muggle reaction suggests something deeper at play than Rowling's romantic arithmancy. Readers form a relationship with a text as it exists, and while authorial revisionism like in Rowling's case has no retrospective impact on the plot, it forever transforms how a fan reads the work. It feels like a betrayal, of both the emotional investment fans put in and the characters she created, to have Rowling now lament the choices she made.

The following 2 member(s) liked the above post:

iluvOriginalsbookworm-ALS--

bookworm-ALS--

IF-Stunnerz

bookworm-ALS--

Joined: 31 August 2011

Posts: 29271

Posted: 16 February 2014 at 5:06am | IP Logged
^ I don't really feel "betrayed" now. I mean, she more or less said by the end of it that Hermione needs someone who can make her laugh. So who better than Ron?

ilovepyaar

IF-Sizzlerz

ilovepyaar

Joined: 04 August 2007

Posts: 20608

Posted: 16 February 2014 at 5:15pm | IP Logged
This was what I've been trying to say for the longest time. I'm an avid R/Hr shipper and at first I was heartbroken, but then I read into it and realized that JKR does NOT regret R/Hr. The writer's needed an attention catching title and voila - the entire HP fandom is back with the shipping wars.

I still love JKR.

The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:

bookworm-ALS--

bookworm-ALS--

IF-Stunnerz

bookworm-ALS--

Joined: 31 August 2011

Posts: 29271

Posted: 17 February 2014 at 1:20am | IP Logged
Originally posted by ilovepyaar

This was what I've been trying to say for the longest time. I'm an avid R/Hr shipper and at first I was heartbroken, but then I read into it and realized that JKR does NOT regret R/Hr. The writer's needed an attention catching title and voila - the entire HP fandom is back with the shipping wars.

I still love JKR.


Exactly! Rita Skeeters abound in the muggle world, too, it seems.

The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:

ilovepyaar

Post Reply New Post

Go to top

Related Topics

  Topics Topic Starter Replies Views Last Post
TOI: Secrets behind writing of HP revealed

2

Lumos 12 618 24 September 2013 at 7:48am
By 2sanjana
Deathly Hallows 2- Behind the scenes safeplacetoland 5 450 12 July 2011 at 12:38pm
By -GredForge-
Some HP Behind the Scenes Pics!! ....Poojie.... 6 885 24 September 2010 at 11:08pm
By Neelambari..
harry potter behind the magic saiba007 0 906 02 December 2009 at 9:41am
By saiba007
behind the scenes hbp pics --AROMAL-- 4 454 08 February 2008 at 8:37pm
By madu1006

Forum Quick Jump

Forum Category

Active Forums

Limit search to this Forum only.

 

Disclaimer: All Logos and Pictures of various Channels, Shows, Artistes, Media Houses, Companies, Brands etc. belong to their respective owners, and are used to merely visually identify the Channels, Shows, Companies, Brands, etc. to the viewer. Incase of any issue please contact the webmaster.