I hv been a silent stalker of JDJ forum because to b honest I m really scared to write something in this forum as I know people might come out with extreme reactions after doing research on my profile history
.. but finally I could gather some courage and make a post here based on the trend what I hv been observing in JDJ since last 5 yrs and this post is coming from a general viewer and not any Mod
I hv noticed that whenever anyone's favourite wins or gets saved from vote out , the whole show becomes fair but when one's fav looses or gets voted out , it becomes unfair or rigged .. But from my observations I feel even if the show is rigged , still the concept of 50% judges marks and 50% audience vote is counted in a fair manner ..
First season when Mona Singh won over Shweta , I saw lots of hue and cry made on how the show is rigged and Sony made Jassi win over a good dancer ..
Then second or third season when the popular KSG lost over football player Baichang Bhutia , I saw people showering praises on this same show saying its the most fair reality show on planet TV
.. But now isn't it contradictory
.. if show is rigged and only telly stars r suppose to win because they hv the kind of fan base who will remain awake for whole night to vote , then KSG should hv won it and not Biachang bhutia .. right ??
And how can one forget Chang too winning over TV hearthrob Sushant Singh ... In this case Sushant was not only popular but also a good dancer .. but still Chang won ... errr is that rigged or fair then .. can anyone answer plss
And then u hv likes of Gurmeet and Prachi desai winning who according to forum's logic won because of popularity or rigged or whatever it is and not talent ..
So I m very very confused now ... If only popular candidates win , then every year daily soaps peeps should win , so then how can Chang or Biachang bhutia types win over KSG or Sushant
.. and if true talent only should win and not popular ones , then how can Gurmeet or Prachi or Mona win over the likes of Isha or Gauhar or Shweta
So for me the result of JDJ if I look at the history is quite complicated ... This yr I feel Shaan , Lauren , the kids and Drashti all hv equal chances of winning from here on and whoever wins it , I feel its unfair to say that its rigged or pre-decided since I can see the amount of hard work all their fan grps r putting all across twitter and IF and other social networking sites to vote for them ... I feel instead of accusing the show organisers or channel or fan grps , every single individual should vote for their favourite if they feel this particular candidate's performance truely deserves him/her a place in next round
.. And if u feel its no use voting because show is rigged , then once a deserving candidate is out , is it right to go around accusing another fan grp for it ?
Every year I see the same story in all the reality shows especially JDJ because it has lots of telly stars but I never get the logic of calling a show rigged only if your fav dont win it
... And errr no I m not a Channel ka spokesperson
.. I m just a neutral viewer who gets amused whenever I visit the forum to know about the performances or scores and all I see is WWF matches going on
Last but not the least the point of my post here is that a channel can start rigging only if a particular contestent gets votes every week by a huge margin .. the way likes of Baichang bhutia got (I still remember the record he created for finale week that his votes were announced too in some news channel) ... So all I can say is instead of wasting time here to fight with each other , why not vote for your fav every week and then see the results
Edited by jyoti06 - 22 August 2013 at 3:48am