No, I have not lost it in choosing this nursery song for my title!😉 If you think about last evening's episode, it is in fact a perfect fit. Let us see what we have:
1 ) Jalal telling Jodha, for the umpteenth time, that he will make her life hell, taaki woh sada us khauff mein jiye ki woh kab kaunsi nayi chaal chalega. It is another matter that neither is he, nor are we, at all clear as to what precisely he can do to fulfil these ferocious threats,when all he can think up, at the end of the day, is having her defeated in a chess game with Ruqaiya. It does not even occur to him that Jodha might not play chess at all, and might thus refuse, with justification, to enter this competition. Jab baat Jodha ki aati hai, toh Shahenshah-e-Hind ki doorandeshi kahin gaayab ho jaati hai!
2) Jodha complaining repeatedly to all and sundry- Lord Krishna, Motibai and herself - that Jalal is bahut bure, that only his ahankar and his hat matter to him; that he has held back her parents so that he can make her smile in public aur ekaant mein rulayenge. This litany of her miseries, which sounds remarkably like a pupil's resentful complaints against an unfair tutor, rather than accusations against a person for whom she has only ghruna (the sar option being now ruled out as he is her suhaag) , is repeated thru the episode.
3) Jalal repeatedly assuring Ruqaiya, for want of any other confidante (the mysteriously missing Abdul would, even if he had been there, hardly have been a suitable substitute) that Jodha ko sazaa zaroor milegi, aur woh use tadpa tadpake sazaa dega. That foolish woman stoking his resentment against Jodha without realizing that in doing so, she is also stoking his obsession with the new begum.
So, by the end of the episode, one is sure that these three would repeat the same lines even if they were awakened at 3 am from a deep sleep. So would we, alas!😉
But the real heart (no, not dil!) of the episode lies not in these OTT passages, but elsewhere.
Jalal: It was there when Jalal picked up a green mirchi from a bowl full of them (what on earth for? This is Mughal Agra, not Bangkok, where such a bowlful is de rigueur for Thai guests) and bit into it, to the consternation of Ruqaiya. As he relates the story of the emperor who was made immune to poison by being fed a little of it every day from his childhood, and ends with Aadat daal raha hoon-.Jodha ke zeher ki aadat daal raha hoon, the sudden bitterness in his voice sears the screen.
My thoughts went back to that other scene in one of the very early episodes, where Jalal, meeting his mother Hamida Banu, reveals how deep is his sense of being abandoned by her as a baby, and the corrosive bitterness that has never left him for the whole of his life.
And I realized anew how right Sangeeta was when she wrote yesterday on my thread : I think also the spice thing further enrages Jalal as it opens up that wound of abandonment/not being cared for, b/c after all food is nourishment and a source of comfort. That he wanted her to feed him, I think on a deeper level, he wants her to care about him; and feeding someone is one way to do that. So, that he thinks she mirched it up is not just an insult for him, but another rejection.
This is a wound that runs deep and festers, unknown even to him. But the chilli incident rubs it raw again. What he hears Jodha say to Motibai (as she assumes, though it is Jalal standing there) rubs it even rawer.
After listening to her disparaging, and singularly unfortunate and misleading comments about the incident- He could not take even slightly hot food, then why did he make me cook for him? He could not handle the Amer ki mirchi, and main to Amer ki beti hoon (the implication, that he could not handle her either, was unmistakable) - not even the most sympathetic onlooker would have believed her earlier denial about the mirchi. Certainly not Jalal.
When he tells her that she has burnt not just his tongue but his zehen, the anger is but a mask for the unacknowledged hurt. As he rages at her in ever increasing fury, what he is really saying is I did everything you wanted of me and more. How then did you do this to me? Why did you do it?
If he really hated her as he claims all the time, there would have been only vengeful anger, none of the bitterness of Jodha ke zeher ki aadat daal raha hoon. The hurt comes from what he wants from her, though he does not even know as yet that he does so. What I wrote some time back, my Shahi Shaadi 5:Storms brewing thread, seems to be coming true already.
What I am waiting for
is to see when it dawns on him that what he wants is not her. Not
the possession of her, legally or physically even, for if he sought the
latter, she, as a dutiful, wedded wife, will not refuse her husband that
intimacy no matter how much he frightens her (Not right, but it does not vitiate the
argument) . What he will want is for her
to want him, in the sense of caring for him, even if the idea of love is
very long in coming.
Now he can, soon enough, command her dutiful obedience in all acceptable things
(I was a bit off here, but never mind!) ,
but not her respect and her caring. This will gnaw at him, and we shall
see how he handles that entirely unfamiliar situation....No one can protect
him from that sense of deprivation that will eat away at him from within. It
is going to be very interesting.
That sense of deprivation is there already, and it is clearly eating away at Jalal. And Ruqaiya's taunts about Jodha having made him suffer a shikast are like twisting a knife in that wound. Everything he does thereafter - the tiresomely repetitive threats to Jodha, telling Ruqaiya about his seeking revenge on Jodha. setting Ruqaiya up to defeat Jodha at chess and thus humiliate her in front of the whole court - is all part of a desperate attempt to somehow drown that inner desolation in triumphant hate.
Jodha: There is something new afoot with her as well.
On the surface, it is difficult to understand what precisely frightens her so much - and for all her untimely assertions to Jalal earlier that day, she is really afraid of him, and not just because of what he might reveal to her parents.
Looked at logically, the worst he can do is the latter. Now since he has promised not to do so, has attached no other conditions to that promise but the hamaam caper, and is a man of his word, she can be pretty sure that he will not spill the beans. There is another reason for her to believe this: once he drops the charade of a happy marriage, he would have lost the one hold he has over her, and she would escape his control. He would never want that, so it would be in his interest to maintain the secret.
As for his ferocious but unspecified threats, she can easily see that he cannot really do anything to her in practical terms, short of sending her back to Amer, and he shows no signs of wanting to do that, for the same reason as above, that she would then escape him.
So then, all Jodha has to do is to pretend to be a happy newlywed in front of her parents, listen to Jalal's daily dose of dire threats with one ear, and carry on as before.
But this is not what she does. She is in a flood of tears at the beginning, worried about her mistake in showing krodh in front of him after the chilli fiasco - and she is not the crying sort - and later, her complaints to (supposedly) Motibai about Jalal are more plaintive and despairing than angry.
When she realises that it is Jalal who was behind her (what can one say of this young lady's olfactory sense, when she cannot smell the difference, at 3 feet, between Jalal's undoubtedly top of the range itr and Motibai's mamuli scent, if at all she has one? ), she does not slip into her veerangana mode. Instead, she proceeds to show him all her weaknesses, and for the first time ever, openly complains to him about the way in which he is treating her, and about the peedha he is causing her.
I was zapped by this last; where is her habitual spine-stiffening pride, which would never let her show him that he can make her miserable? This is not the old Jodha. In fact it is almost like a hurt wife accusing a harsh husband of ill-treatment. And when he, now convinced (with considerable justification, as noted above) that she was lying when she had denied all responsibility for the chilli disaster, goes off into his standard threatening spiel and leaves in a huff, Jodha's woebegone face, and the haunted expression in her eyes, hint at something new, for there is in them none of the rage one would expect.
His professed hatred for her is beginning to affect her badly, and make her miserable and weepy. This is curious and revealing, for this hatred was precisely what she claimed to want, and she should have been relieved and happy about it.
There is another odd, revealing little moment that points in the same direction. At the end of that charming interlude with young Rahim, after he announces that he is the Shahenshah ka beta, his mother tells Jodha that she is the Shahenshah's Begum Salima Sultan. For a long moment , Jodha's eyes hold an indefinable, troubled expression. Is it a sudden sense of isolation, of exclusion from what she assumes that this pleasant lady, another spouse of their husband, who moreveor has a son from him (Jodha would assume that Rahim is Jalal's son), enjoys? She gets hold of herself soon enough, and salutes Salima very graciously as her senior, but as the two leave, that troubled expression is back in her eyes. The carefree, headstrong princess is beginning to grow up, to feel things that she has never felt before.
The journey that will end in a lovers' meeting has begun, all unknowingly, for her as well.
Phew! I think I could easily set up as the resident IF psychologist!!😉
Question of the day: Why the devil did the faithful Motibai not find a way to alert her mistress, even thru a nudge in passing as she slinks out under Jalal's angry gaze, that her bete noire has descended on her?
Joke of the day: Adham Khan cosying up to his own wife under the drink-fuelled illusion that she is Motibai. I wonder when he woke up, with a king size hangover, and realised that it was only his lawful other after all! I wish they had showed us his face then!😉
Shyamala
B.Cowsik
NB: This is not relevant to this post, but rather to the Thought of the Day in my last one. In response to a comment on that thread, I had put down my take on whether Jalal had gained a lot when he gave the paanch hazari Mansubedari to Raja Bharmal, and whether Bharmal had lost a lot by accepting it. This is reproduced below, for those who might be interested in these politico-military aspects. The others, ie those who have stayed the course this far, can heave a sigh of relief at this point, and quit!😉
"I do not see how and why
Jalal can be said to be devilish in this
context. He is astute and wily, that is all. So were all the emperors
of India, beginning from Chandragupta Maurya, and elsewhere as well;
it was dangerous to get in their way. Nobility has never had much
to do with the needs of an empire, not even under Marcus Aurelius.
As for what Jalal gained from
giving Bharmal the Mansubedari, it should not be overestimated, for one has to take into account that
getting Amer on his side does not solve the problem of Rajputana for Jalal, far
from it.
Amer is a minor kingdom, as Mahaam Anga points out, and as Dadisa
notes, it is surrounded by bigger, more powerful kingdoms who covet it and
might have conquered it at any time. These kingdoms have not as yet been
coopted by Agra, not to speak of the ferociously independent Mewar of Maharana
Udai Singh and his successor, Maharana Pratap.
So Jalal does not gain very much from the
alliance with Amer, except for starting off a trend, both of the roti-beti ka rishta with the Mughals,
which was soon extended to Jodhpur, Jaipur and many others, both for Akbar and
for Salim, and of the politico-military alliance with the Mughals which made
the Rajputs fight Akbar's battles for him in the farflung corners of the
empire.
In fact, Amer's biggest contribution to the Mughal Empire was Mansingh, who
was a pillar of strength and loyalty for Akbar right till the end.
Nor does Amer lose anything except some nominal independence, and as the Dadisa
points out, that might have been lost at any time to one of its predatory
Rajput neighbours.Now Amer is safe from all of them, and Bharmal can
sleep in peace.
In fact it is Jalal who should be concerned, for when he sends Bharmal or his
sons into battle against other Rajputs, the odds are that they will all be
taken hostage again, only this time it is Jalal who will have to pay their
ransom or go to war to liberate them! 😉I never saw such a
bunch of deadbeats as the Amer royals, whence the Thought for the Day in my post..
Again, when it is said that that Jalal
had extracted a much higher price from
Bharmal than he would have paid had Jalal just conquered his land by force,
one has to take into account that if
Sharifuddin or Adham Khan had been left to wage a mukammal jung against
Amer, there would not have been much left of Amer to salvage. So the kind of
security Bharmal gained, from the Mughals as well as from his covetous Rajput
neighbours, was not to be sneezed at!
Jalal pays a high price for the Amer alliance as it is an icebreaker with the
Rajputs, like the first strawberries of the season, which are always
expensive. Plus of course he wants Jodha. There was nothing underhand about it,
and he kept his end of all his bargains all his life, and so did Jahangir. So
in a way it was win-win, or else it would never have lasted so long.
As to the idea that Jodha persuaded Akbar "to do right by her land" , whether that means just Amer or Rajputana as a whole, the historical fact is that Jodha, his first Rajput queen, had only limited influence over Akbar's policy towards Rajputana. This was shown when he took Chittor in 1568, after a very long and difficult siege, and he had every one of the defenders killed, to make an example of Chittor. This practice was quite common, including all over Europe, right up to and including the Napoleonic wars of the early 19th century, The example seems to have worked, for Ranthambhore surrendered very quickly the same year, and it was only then that Akbar had finally tamed Rajputana.
Even in this serial, the positive, just, and at times even gentle aspects of Jalal's character are already there pre-Jodha - witness his chastising Adham Khan for his misdeeds in Malwa, his reaction to Raja Takhatmal's arguments, his attitude towards Mansingh even as he is at loggerheads with Mansingh's buasa, and even his charming playfulness with his little saalis. Jodha will undoubtedly enhance and focus these qualities in due course, but th basics are already there for her to work on, she does not have to create them.
comment:
p_commentcount