Bharat Ka Veer Putra -Maharana Pratap

India-Forums

   
Bharat Ka Veer Putra -Maharana Pratap
Bharat Ka Veer Putra -Maharana Pratap

Were Jodha and Prtap related???? (Page 27)

Pari117 IF-Stunnerz
Pari117
Pari117

Bharat Ka Veer Putra - Maharana Pratap Banner Contest Winner
Joined: 09 January 2012
Posts: 25663

Posted: 31 August 2013 at 1:24pm | IP Logged
Originally posted by Mini.S

see..you misunderstand me.i get scared out of my nerves when you coolly accuse me of mocking something which i respect.
yes,i mentioned today's india,
you boasted of it,and criticized mughals...of history. hence..i too mentioned...mewar of history.

sry but d way you mentioned mewar being democratic sounded like dat. I take my words back. But i'll say mewar wasn't invaded by outsiders, but mughals were outsiders who ruled us

Pari117 IF-Stunnerz
Pari117
Pari117

Bharat Ka Veer Putra - Maharana Pratap Banner Contest Winner
Joined: 09 January 2012
Posts: 25663

Posted: 31 August 2013 at 1:25pm | IP Logged
Originally posted by Mini.S

Originally posted by Pari117

Originally posted by Autumn_Rose



@mini lol.. true the concept of nationalism is new to us.

@pari. We are not slaughtered in any way, thankfully we are on our way to develop and modernisation. Our firm cultural roots will not make us completely westernised, hopefully. But look at our politicians. We still have a long way to go. Need men to respect women. Why are the perpetrators still at large? Power and money are still above the law.


but we are independent. We can choose our leader by ourselves. Still we can bring difference. If one is comparing india of present with india of mughal reign, der india of present is far far better
ok..but you were comparing mewar and hindustan.
sorry for bringing in india.
so tell me,how was mewar better than hindustan?

mewar was part of hindustan it was being ruled by someone who was hindustani.
Autumn_Rose IF-Sizzlerz
Autumn_Rose
Autumn_Rose

Joined: 19 June 2013
Posts: 12454

Posted: 31 August 2013 at 1:25pm | IP Logged
Originally posted by Pari117

Originally posted by Mini.S

see..you misunderstand me.i get scared out of my nerves when you coolly accuse me of mocking something which i respect.
yes,i mentioned today's india,
you boasted of it,and criticized mughals...of history. hence..i too mentioned...mewar of history.

sry but d way you mentioned mewar being democratic sounded like dat. I take my words back. But i'll say mewar wasn't invaded by outsiders, but mughals were outsiders who ruled us

They were outsiders, but they got mixed with us unlike the British.. much like the Aryan invasion. There is a difference.
Pari117 IF-Stunnerz
Pari117
Pari117

Bharat Ka Veer Putra - Maharana Pratap Banner Contest Winner
Joined: 09 January 2012
Posts: 25663

Posted: 31 August 2013 at 1:26pm | IP Logged
Originally posted by Autumn_Rose

Originally posted by Pari117

Originally posted by Autumn_Rose



@mini lol.. true the concept of nationalism is new to us.

@pari. We are not slaughtered in any way, thankfully we are on our way to develop and modernisation. Our firm cultural roots will not make us completely westernised, hopefully. But look at our politicians. We still have a long way to go. Need men to respect women. Why are the perpetrators still at large? Power and money are still above the law.


but we are independent. We can choose our leader by ourselves. Still we can bring difference. If one is comparing india of present with india of mughal reign, der india of present is far far better


People have been suppressed in every era, regardless of the ruler. Especially women, it's only a matter of magnitude.

Plus, the herofication of historical figures is too much for some. More than necessary, so that it blinds people so they are unable to see the facts

my point was being ruled by someone amongst us is far better dan monopoly of outsiders
iMini IF-Sizzlerz
iMini
iMini

Joined: 10 April 2012
Posts: 21321

Posted: 31 August 2013 at 1:27pm | IP Logged
Originally posted by Pari117

Originally posted by Autumn_Rose

Originally posted by Mini.S

Originally posted by Pari117

Originally posted by Mini.S

do you know there was nothing called INDIA those days?ROFL
rajputana was say...one 'country' ,mughal empire was another country ...concept of
nationalism is something the western countries gifted us

you should have read history related books. It clearly mentions everything. We were called land of hindus where hindus resided. Pls refer them than mocking on term i used
yes..you are a history genius ..you should also know that akbar was called emperor of hindustan.


Akbar drank water from the Ganges river, which he called the water of immortality'. Special people were stationed at Sorun and later Haridwar to dispatch water, in sealed jars, to wherever he was stationed.[better source needed] According to Jahangir's memoirs, he was fond of fruits and had little liking for meat, which he stopped eating in his later years. Akbar also once visited Vrindavan, the birthplace of Lord Krishna in the year 1570, and gave permission for four temples to be built by the Gaudiya Vaisnavas, which were Madana-mohana, Govindaji, Gopinatha and Jugal Kisore.

^^Akbar isn't the jallad he was made out to be in the initial episodes of the show.. he never was. but oh, boy.. he had quite a temper.

http://www.hindunet.org/hindu_history/modern/akbar_vs.html
then read this too. I like rajat tokas since PRC. But here i'm debating abt real history so pls read some real facts as well.
see pari,both you and i are intelligent enough to know this source of information isnt authentic ...just another site intolerant of islam

The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:

Autumn_Rose

Pari117 IF-Stunnerz
Pari117
Pari117

Bharat Ka Veer Putra - Maharana Pratap Banner Contest Winner
Joined: 09 January 2012
Posts: 25663

Posted: 31 August 2013 at 1:29pm | IP Logged
Originally posted by Mini.S

ok you got off topic.as far as healthy debating is concerned, i wished you stopped telling people here they should read some history ..as if its just you knowing everything. i didn't want to write this dear,but when you mentioned of healthy debating,i needed to write of this annoying thing occasionally featuring your posts.period.

just not autumnrose gave a link and extract. I could have pointed out that. Its just that whatever you are saying, i'm not able to corelate dat with d topic we are talking abt. As you brought india of today in comparison with mughal
iMini IF-Sizzlerz
iMini
iMini

Joined: 10 April 2012
Posts: 21321

Posted: 31 August 2013 at 1:30pm | IP Logged
Originally posted by Pari117

Originally posted by Mini.S

Originally posted by Pari117

Originally posted by Autumn_Rose



@mini lol.. true the concept of nationalism is new to us.

@pari. We are not slaughtered in any way, thankfully we are on our way to develop and modernisation. Our firm cultural roots will not make us completely westernised, hopefully. But look at our politicians. We still have a long way to go. Need men to respect women. Why are the perpetrators still at large? Power and money are still above the law.


but we are independent. We can choose our leader by ourselves. Still we can bring difference. If one is comparing india of present with india of mughal reign, der india of present is far far better
ok..but you were comparing mewar and hindustan.
sorry for bringing in india.
so tell me,how was mewar better than hindustan?

mewar was part of hindustan it was being ruled by someone who was hindustani.
ok,..i understand you don't support foreign invasion.see..whole of aryan sect are descendants of europeans..which fills up most of north india now.will you call them foreigners? no.
akbar was born in hindustan.so was humayun.but not babur.thats it.
Pari117 IF-Stunnerz
Pari117
Pari117

Bharat Ka Veer Putra - Maharana Pratap Banner Contest Winner
Joined: 09 January 2012
Posts: 25663

Posted: 31 August 2013 at 1:31pm | IP Logged
Originally posted by Autumn_Rose

Originally posted by Pari117

Originally posted by Mini.S

@pari
why don't you just forget that movie and serial? they show no truth but fiction. you said you read aineakbari,then why bother to even mention that movie n serial?

but the answers i read are mostly influenced from show. Ekta has deteriorated history largely. So why bother abt it. Its gud to watch it as fiction we can see image of truth in it at all


When it comes to the romance, showing rukayya as a narcissistic dumb bimbo, akbar looting temples (i bet they confused him with.. mohd. ghazni?), it's obviously fiction.


But akbar's political conquests and strategies shown are accurate. I'm in love with the show now.

i take show as mere fiction. But when we talk abt reality ruqaiya was not dat evil which ekta is showing and spoiling d great legend ruqaiya. So definately one can't expect genuineness in ekta's show

Go to top

Related Topics

  Topics Author Replies Views Last Post
TOI-Maharana Pratap in Jodha-Akbar...!!!!

2 3

Author: Proud-India   Replies: 23   Views: 5146

Proud-India 23 5146 29 July 2013 at 7:43am by Marathi_Mulgi
thought related to dheer bai child

Author: ..pratham..   Replies: 5   Views: 4225

..pratham.. 5 4225 17 July 2013 at 10:04pm by lexy_rix
History related to the current war?

2 3

Author: pgshah   Replies: 16   Views: 2352

pgshah 16 2352 01 July 2013 at 6:19am by sameersaagar

Forum Quick Jump

Forum Category / Channels
Forums

Bharat Ka Veer Putra -Maharana Pratap Topic Index

  • Please login to check your Last 10 Topics posted

Check these Celebrity also

Disclaimer: All Logos and Pictures of various Channels, Shows, Artistes, Media Houses, Companies, Brands etc. belong to their respective owners, and are used to merely visually identify the Channels, Shows, Companies, Brands, etc. to the viewer. Incase of any issue please contact the webmaster.

Popular Channels :
Star Plus | Zee TV | Sony TV | Colors TV | SAB TV | Life OK

Quick Links :
Top 100 TV Celebrities | Top 100 Bollywood Celebs | About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | Forum Index