Posted: 26 June 2013 at 8:16am | IP Logged
Originally posted by Stargirl06
Originally posted by lucymoni
Originally posted by shumi.
what is wrong with this lady?... i think she want to show her knowledge in indian history
...it is purely a fictional show...it was clearly said in the show
first of all i am not a lady but a girl,
second what they are showing is completely illogical. Akbar was a very smart king, his behaviour is very childish in the show. only because of rajat i am watching the show. and about knowledge, these are basic facts oh history children are taught in eighth class maybe five.
See. This is a fictional romance. Fiction. Romance. If Ekta follows history, there is not much she can actually do with this story. The movie has already told everything. We need to see new things, interesting things. And as you know, romance heroes are always childish, that's why they are romance heroes.
You should really read Chitra Banerjee Divakaruni's 'Palace of Illusion' sometime. She twists Mahabharat, and focuses on Draupadi and Karna's unrequited love for each other. And it is a beautiful romance. Which would not have been not possible if she followed the mythology faithfully. Historical romance or not, this is a romance. And romance cares only for the relationship between the protagonists, rest does not matter. If you wish to see history presented faithfully, you may not find that in watching daily soaps. Try a good history book maybe. Even if Bairam Khan remains alive forever, and attacks Amer, you need to overlook the fact. The romance is important here, not the history.
what are you saying? was akbar a FICTION?
don't try to save it giving illogical explanations.
akbar remained in bairam khan's tutelage only for four years, by 17 or 18 age of akbar, khan was dead or deserted from his vazir post.
abul fazl wrote that his rude and proud behaviour lead to his demise.