Insensitive behaviour of RK cannot be justified - Page 4

Originally posted by: Saayaniz

errr... do u want to mean Sultan became underworld king/leader (not a petty criminal u see ) , an WANTED criminal just by doing "self defence" ?? 🤣,🤣,🤣
even RK too lost his father at childhood , but he didn become a gangster , a criminal . He struggled & made a career in fair world . Regarding hitting Mukund , he was drunk !! He didn even realise he has hit someone . Later he too wanted to pay a compensation . If m not wrong something around 25 lacs ? much more than what court would have ordered him if he was dragged to court . So from that point of view even RK too wasn't at fault at all (just applying the same theory u applied on Sultan) 😳
but can u justify the profession of killing ppl to make money anyhow ?? 🤢 Oh ! u just told he does only "Self Defence" 😆 but seriously man !! (or woman...whatever u r ) is it logically possible someone becomes underworld King , The leader , the most wanted criminal just by doing self defence ?? seriously ?? doesn' it sound too lame ? or r u saying its ok to b in crime world & doing notorious crimes to make money 😕 ??
Well , my interest in this post just flew away through the window 😆 carry on...m not gonna come back to disturb u again 😆

Originally posted by: Saayaniz

errr... do u want to mean Sultan became underworld king/leader (not a petty criminal u see ) , an WANTED criminal just by doing "self defence" ?? 🤣,🤣,🤣

Originally posted by: tanvismile

Why you always read only the cover when the book is open infront of you.We all know When rashid drunkard came infront of Sultan s car ,he even went and sorry ,Thats called courtesy or should i say realisation .The same lacks in RK isnt it.Sultan is a gangster that is due to MK ,rashid ;so he is in a place where you have to murder people in your defence ,when goons arived at chawl sultan had to kill those people if not the innocent people at chawl would get hurt.