Nudity/exposing = Modernizing/ enjoying freedom?? - Page 5

Originally posted by: hit_homerun

i appreciate the subtle sense of ur reply . 

take a look @ ur right . u might find the pic of a women exposing her breasts , in the car . do u ? coz i can . [on this web site] the onlly clothing material is draped on her nipples .

what do u make of this woman ? 

what would other people make of this woman ? 

now prev. posts emphasized on how a person solely chooses his/her dressing style 

what do u think this woman makes of herself ?

does she become modern by exposing her body like that ? or does she enjoy her freedom ? does she provide a full time matinee free show to her obvious spectators ? does she become subject to public display ? 

No, I don't see any ad of that nature. But you know what I do see? Mom's best kept secret to fuller lips. Big business telling me I need lip implants. 

I don't agree. I freaking love myself.

Same thing. You are targeted for certain ads due to your age, gender, location, interests, etc. You don't need to act on the advertisement.

Now, you are acting like the average person by being offended by the advertisement but you offense is for all the wrong reasons. It is the sexism and the mere objectification of a human you should be offended by, not the view of breasts. 

You are in no place to choose what is moral or not for someone. Clearly the ad has a purpose. It is supposed to appeal to heterosexual men. Maybe it does its job. 

Your offense ain't going to change that and if you ask me, the reasons' where it's at. Re-evaluate those and we'll talk. I can't say if she is modern or not because she may still be against reproductive justice and vote for Romney. (that was a joke for any angry folk). 

Lastly, I dont dress for other people. I am pretty sure no one in their right mind give a damn what a stranger thinks when they dress up in the morning. You are giving the crowd too much credit. but in this case, it's an ad so yes, she is dressing to impress the target demographic. 

the problem is , when a person dresses lewdly , many people are put to shame rather than jsut them . they might not even realize that . 

then those people dont have other things to worry about. generalizations jeez

of course , i m not suggesting that people should go around burqa clad. just appealing for them to cover vital parts of the body . 

hey now. aint nothing wrong with that if that floats your boat.

too much is not good enough and too little is offensive.

the pressure by no one in particular these days

i owuld also like to know what enjoyment does one feel to cover only her genitals and breast . ?😕 might as well as remove 

tanning. you go to the beach to tan. also, just knowing you can do whatever the heck you want since your big boss is not putin. that is how good it feels. 

somehow nipples seem to infuriate conservation in people when the specimen is literally showing everyhting . 😆

i hope i havent offended u . 😊

once again , appreciated ur subtlety 

dont give yourself too much credit. you will not be the reason I am offended. (partial joke, I cant tell how serious I am. I need coffee). 

Yeah I am not sure what subtly meant in this context but cool. 

Originally posted by: hit_homerun

greetings !

So there are number of reasons one wear dress and presenting yourself as modern is one

my topic was that , would being covered make u less modern and from stone age ??? or would being nanga punga make u oh-so modern ? 😆

i was led to conclude by previous threads modernization should be measured by one's mentality . 

people going around calling covered ones stone aged is modern ?

and hell this happened on this site .😲

and  i;ve been trying to comprehend lately how micro minis liberate a person ? how is it fun to wear short clothes ?if u can then enlighten me pls 😊

Originally posted by: Krani

hmmm , did i ever call them stoneaged ? did i resort to name calling ? highly judgemental ? im merely telling what the eyes show me !

and all im trying to figure out is how people find it liberating to expose !

if u can prove the sentiment behind nudity to me , then i will apply ashoka formula - tolerance 

till the time being i will call nudist nanga punga attention seekers 

Originally posted by: DonnaHarvey

What are we debating/discussing here?

Fifty something women wearing Forever 21 skinny jeans and acting like teens – or women in general who flash their skin and cleavage.

I live by the mantra, if you got it – flaunt it; if you don't – cloak it.

Originally posted by: hit_homerun

By your "logic", they are merely name-calling because that's how they see it. 

The argument is not about how liberating it is - it's about a person having the choice to dress in whatever they want without them being name-called, or perceived as being less moral than those who cover from head to toe.

Funny how you say you do not resort to name-calling, yet you do that exact thing in the ending of your "argument"

Edited by Krani - 10 years ago

Originally posted by: hit_homerun

Originally posted by: Krani

oh , um , ok 😳

so i guess i was name calling

i hinestly dint realize . coz i thought that was -1 level of describing a person 

baby i have lots more i can say

but i will refrain , from name callin

yeah ok 

but i still havent gotten any formidable reply - Why do  people wear exposing clothes ? no really do they not have enough money for themselves to but fully covering and stitched material ? 😆

in that case , im ready to daan donate my old clothes to them . i m sure u'd  want to join me 😉

Originally posted by: hit_homerun

Why do you wear the clothes you do?

What if you went out and somebody called you names and made you feel shit about yourself based on what you wore?

Why does being fully covered make someone look morally better, compared to someone wearing a dress? 

~K