If not then, punch the Beholder.
If not then, punch the Beholder.
On a serious note, Nudity is hardly a "Modern" thing in the exact definition of the term (Kamasutra, Konark, Ajanta anyone? π), if you leave out Nudist colonies or Topless Mag/Movie shots.
As for freedom, YUP. Wearing what you want to is FREEDOM. But displaying freedom in a manner that paints you in an unsavoury light and/OR makes you look vulgar is undesirable.
So we're dealing with two separate things---Freedom and Suitability. Just because I have thunder thighs doesn't mean I shouldn't have the freedom to wear Miniskirts, but that doesn't stop me from looking gross in public.
Originally posted by: K.W.
As for freedom, YUP. Wearing what you want to is FREEDOM. But displaying freedom in a manner that paints you in an unsavoury light and/OR makes you look vulgar is undesirable.
dont u think exposing oneself is undesirable and vulgar . sure everyone could wear what they'd want coz they are free to .
but in public ?
i personally dont understand the whole sentiment of clothes designed to show a little too much .
people might as well as carry a name-tag saying
* Need attention , not in a paternal way *
no offence to no one
So we're dealing with two separate things---Freedom and Suitability. Just because I have thunder thighs doesn't mean I shouldn't have the freedom to wear Miniskirts, but that doesn't stop me from looking gross in public.
Originally posted by: epiphany.
I do consider it freedom, yes. But worldly speaking, that would just be a tad bit rowdy of you. π³ And when I punch you in return, I'd make sure it's also meant in the nicest possible way.
Originally posted by: hit_homerun
greeting mcni...with regard to what u have said , which could be right in its own way , me thinkst exposure should be taboo anywhere . π₯± age , no matter !course , most people have issues with most thingsbut , tell me something βur sister goes frolickin' on the road in minis ! whtcha gonna do ?if it were to me , i would be carrying a squared cardboard wrapped around those denuded thighs of her , wherever she went . πmc , define freedom .i would say not restricted from doing things which are essentially beneficial to youis nudity / exposure beneficially essential to us ?πawaitin ur thoughts
Originally posted by: ITrustMyHeartPeople have a habit of poking into others business than much needed these days. Freedom is the right to live, eat, wear whatever you wish for regardless of age unless it is criticizing or violating any law/religion or is vulgar/horrendous to show up at a public place. And I don't see sporting minis coming under either of these categories. What is democracy for, if you can't dress the way you want. π
BTW, Can I know who's that actress?
we are mixing two different things.. if I am going to watch a movie and actress wears something unflattering... i have every right to poke my nose and comment on her clothes.. she chose profession where people pay to watch her/him..
if i am on my own, people should have no business to see and comment what i wear unless they are my employers, family or friends. if you don't like someone dressed up a certain way don't look there.. how many people we actually look at anyway.
comment:
p_commentcount