Originally posted by .Baazigar.
I think instead having tu tu main main its better to have some data having facts and figures. I am not forcing you to read those. you are asking for figures and still have objection on that. By the way many are more interested in giving advice what one should do and should not.
Lets clarify as i have to quota facts and figure to substantiate the debate obviously i have to post articles of the same having the facts , in fact i cant discover or invent facts , i have to quote authentic datas where ever they were available:
That first article was on the issue of online reality in twitter , facebook etc. of section of people that i mentioned earlier while having a discussion with King Anu, so its obvious that i try to provide him facts on the same. I am not saying about this forum The second one is on to substantiate about the source of money that one need to provide welfare schemes that another member discussed. The third one on the issue of women and their state in Gujarat. Obviously when we are discussing about modi and the said issues were about gujarat i will quote the same.
Ok as you enforcing me to provide data on comparison of various states than, i will copy paste on the comparison on the basis of GDP figures between different states of having similar GDP size and their progress in decades each.Hope you will counter that instead countering me. It expose how already a developed state like gujarat progressed since long inspite of magician modi, or how many states have similarly growth without tomtoming like modi who boost every minute that he made the land of honey and milk to Gujarat now and than.
|Rates of Growth of gross GDP:|
|State||80/81 to 90/91||90/91 to 97/98||02/03 to 11/12|
it's easier to have high growth rates starting from a low base. Given you yourself acknowledge that Gujrat had higher state of development before Modi took over, the growth rates achieved with Modi in charge then become even more impressive, not less like you guys have been implying. Simple eco 101.
second, Modi's Gujrat has been able to achieve high growth rates even when the congress centre has not been inclined to help him and even when they've tried to distract him with one case after the other. Shame on them that in spite of their best (worst?) efforts, they havent been able to find anything to nail him or to detract from Gujrat's growth.
third, let's not selectively note areas where Gujrat like other states in India need progress, whether social progress or otherwise. Problems exist everywhere in India. Farmers commit suicide everywhere. Just look at Bihar and UP, which have been in coalitions for a long time with Congress at the Centre. It's for nothing that they are considered basket-cases of India, coming a close second after Delhi (another Congress ruled state) as the rape and goon territories of India. Now if you call that social progress, maybe it is, Bihari style.
fourth, in stead of positing random articles, can you try answering any of the points raised by me in my post. They were a direct response to the stories made up about Modi, about Setalvad and about the riots engendered during congress eras. It's stuff you guys posted, so try answering questions instead of quoting from your favorite anti-Modi sources. Yes, that will need some thinking, but try.
finally, this for King Anu- since you posted one tale about your personal experience with one Indian you consider smart, can you explain why so many NRI Indians support Modi, a lot of them physicians (mentioning physicians since they seem to be your standard-bearer of smartness). Dont tell us now that NRIs are not generally more educated or smarter than the average crowd.