Posted:
11 years ago
1)why cv's changed track as revenge when they can't makeor show rk redemption and rishbala's union.
2)even on unwed day also rishbala didn't get separately. cv's showed abhi sab kuch katam nahi hua when madhu breaksdown her bangles broke down and rk turns immediately aur uski chehre pe phikar hai clearly shown,.this for whom.madhu is not looking at him.after unwed whenever madhu is in pain he used feel the pain and also woorried for madhu eventhough he used to hurt her humiliate her infront of others.it's rk.if you can remember,madhu cries when radhaji meets padmini to make her ready for marriage with shamsher then madhu fears that kahi negative effect na ho,radhaji consoling madhu but rk comes and says'biwi mumbai or rajasthan main jitna barish naahi hata hai uthna tumhara ankhon main asoo ate hai.radhaji wants to says something but madhu tells radhaji leave rk it's rk's style of consoling to forget small pain ,rk makes big pain to forget it.why they showed before.
3)1st march or 2nd maarch when rishbala in drunken state madhu asks rk how lies he told to her then cv's should tell by rk that whatever happened between rishbala is a lie.but no they told he told one lie that is rk not having heart why..in subconscious state madhu forgives rk and goes back.for what reason they showed it.
4)rk asked madhu sultan's phone no and madhu inkaar karthi hai.at that time rk asked madhu kya woh mard nahi hai,tum apne pallu main chupana kyun chahthe ho.later what rk told that only happened mumbai ka sultan ek normal ladki ke sahara woh bhi jiya and he wants his son should taked by madhu.is this happen in real life..
5)madhu having friendship with gangster and hiding from police is this happen.we're seein all illogical thinhgs happening then why can't we see rk's illogical. things.they're still married couple or not cv's going to give reply as how cv's gave reply supporting that madhu mad that's why she is going to support sultan and his son uske liya bale chawl wale khatre main ho.then everyone son wah sab ke muh par thappad thi madhu ki jawab.then cv's justify rk's also.they can't spoil his character without any redemption and they can't show rk as loving as pouppy and going around making sad face as if about to die but bas maut nahi aa rahi hai.
6)rk becoming soft is out of character he can realise and he realising his love towards madhu .acording to cv's rk's redemption is already started before where noone understood it.when everyone satisfied with cv's justification regarding sultan and madhu characters shown by cv's then why can't accept rk as cv's are showing him.why showing partiality.
7)we talk rk should be punished for drink and drive ,for hurting madhu and mukku's accident .then sultan shouldn't get punishment for killing[if theyt're bad means he had right to kill,here sultan is behaving like god,why?].madhu hiding sultan why who is she is she a law or is she god to tell whatever sultan must be supported rathher than geting.hiding a small gooda is crime than hiding gangster is not a crime.how madhu is differtiateing or making herself as above law.these things are supported and wanted madhu to be gangster's wfe but now woman right's and human right's come only we talk about rk. cv's already showed so many times that rk loves madhu alot but his ego is coming in between.do you all think cv's can't justify rk as so called reasonably justified madhu and sultan's character.
