Posted: 20 January 2013 at 10:51pm | IP Logged
Originally posted by Saniya93Think the same, the weekly money must've been substantially higher for all the contestants to agree to the 50L final prize, from the beginning they've said the prize money is 50L so it isn't as if they've been blindsided. And for all the participants to agree to the reduced final prize, the only reason can be that their weekly pay would've been made substantially attractive.
I feel its unfair to half the prize money...but then again maybe their weekly earning might have been more therefore the prize money less. But yeah should have been 1cr