just addressing some of the questions above-
i am fine with interconnectedness- it's what i believe is the case. There's simply too much uncertainty about where our particles are to be sure we know where we begin and where we end.π
i also think there are two things going on- one is "information" and the other is obviously "material". We 'experience" color, although color is not a physical attribute of an object. That experience is in terms of material neural activity. Then we have information- the forms of objects. We model these in our minds in terms of their interactions with other objects in our minds, and add our experience of color onto them. The information itself is something transient. Either way, what "we" experience is only our consciousness, not the real world. We can't ever know what the real world is because the only thing we ever experience or "see" is the image in our minds.
An example would be the bits encoded in a digital music disk. The CD player transforms it into electrical impulses that are then amplified to drive the speakers. Sound waves get transmitted, vibrate our ear drums, send signals to the brain, and we find ourselves "hearing" and 'enjoying" the music. But what did we start out with? Bits on a disk. We experienced something that was just a model encoding data.
Almost makes me wonder if each one of us is living in a parallel world that is all in our minds, not a real world that is all substance but no mind. π
comment:
p_commentcount