The Nehru-Gandhi Dynasty

Prarara thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
So, what do you think of the Nehru-Gandhi Dynasty. Is it right for India to continually give into the Congress-leading Gandhi Dynasty? Are the members of the family truly as worthy as the first, and greatest, Jawaharlal Nehru?  

Created

Last reply

Replies

34

Views

3474

Users

12

Frequent Posters

TheRowdiest thumbnail
Anniversary 18 Thumbnail Group Promotion 7 Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 17 years ago
No not at all.A leadership only in the hands of one family is not good 4 the country.
Swar_Raj thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
Ruling country is not a birth right anymore. You have to be capable of it. Currently none of them is. A qualifuication that you are from Gandhi/Nehru parivar is not enough. if a ex primeminister family has to come in power, i would recommend Shastriji's family that i visited as a college trip. THey still had same old house and no luxury that you would expect. Very down to earth family. (This is from my experience only. that too about 12 yrs ago)

It was such an irony that Congress cannot find anyother way to collect vote except saying that Sonia is the daughterin law of the country 🤢

Sonia has done so many acts before Rajiv was elected PM..even took Indian nationality then and never gave up her original nationality. So if Italy ever decides to make her PM..she can be a PM there too...WOW and handle two countries.

Also on my visit to italy last year, i know exactly why Sonia does not go back to Italy. One of the most disgusting country. We had things stolen right from under our nose, straight from airport to hotel 🤢
SolidSnake thumbnail
Anniversary 18 Thumbnail Group Promotion 5 Thumbnail Engager 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
It is pathetic to see Congress leaders and workers treat Gandhi Family as some divine family. And even Indian news media is not much behind.🤢
insouciance thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
Bequeathal is a scourge 🤢
syrene thumbnail
Anniversary 18 Thumbnail Group Promotion 3 Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
Mr Sharma, are they not also Italians by birth?

S Gurumurthy

Mr Anand Sharma, the spokesman of the Congress Party, first declared that Rahul and Priyanka were virtually members of the Congress by "birth". This was on Wednesday, the 21st January. Within 24 hours, realising he had invited charges of dynastic succession, he modified the declaration. He said that "Rahul and Priyanka Gandhi are an integral part of the Congress and they are its primary members."

"But, Mr Sharma, when and where did they become members," asked a mischievous journalist. Sharma could not elaborate. Then he fumbled, "I will give you all information later as to when they joined and where." It is of course not difficult to construct records of primary membership of a party that has a history of large bogus membership. Sharma finally eulogised Rahul and Priyanaka as the fifth generation in Nehru-Gandhi family to serve the organisation and the country.

Note the appropriation of 'Gandhi' along with 'Nehru'. The suffix 'Nehru' itself is a misappropriation. Arun Nehru who is sitting in his farm house in Outer Delhi and writing columns in assorted newspapers is a more legitimate Nehru than Antonia Maino, the mother of Rahul and Priyanka. Will he ever be allowed to serve the party like Sonia or her siblings? He lost out more because he was a Nehru, a competitor for the brand Nehru. Rahul is to be married to a foreigner girl, not an Italian, but Columbian. Priyanka is already married to Robert Vadra. Where does 'Nehru' get pasted over all this?

How about that saint, 'Gandhi', the Mahatma? If pasting Nehru's name is deception, Gandhi's is fraudulently perverted. Where is the true Gandhi family? Where is Rajmohan Gandhi, the direct grandson and the direct heir of not only the Mahatma but also of another great man Rajaji? It is a double fraud, against both Gandhi and Nehru, to designate Antonia Maino and her siblings as Gandhi-Nehru family. There is of course a law against misuse of names. But the framers of that law never visualised fraudulent misappropriation of names. Hence did not provide for that.

Now let us come to the inheritance of Rahul and Priyanka by birth. What did they really inherit by birth? The primary membership of the Congress party? No. That is an inheritance granted by Mr Sharma. The real inheritance is something different. When Antonia Maino gave birth to them she was an Italian national in the Indian Prime Minister's household. She had not decided on becoming an Indian citizen. She was weighing her options for 15 long years on whether to live in India or to leave for Italy. She made that choice ultimately in 1983, after she enjoyed stately patronage in the Prime Minister's household for 15 years. Till then Sonia was a loyal Italian. Rahul and Priyanka, the newly discovered primary members of the Congress by birth, were born to an Italian mother, Sonia. Being the children of an Italian national they are born citizens of Italy. The Italian Constitution says that the Italian nationality inheres in them. A few months back I read a book on Sonia Gandhi by Rashid Kidwai, a journalist. Referring to my article in these columns (May 17, 1999) Kidwai writes in his book, ''The Congress and 10 Janpath have not contradicted Gurumurthy's contentions.'' That is they have not denied that Rahul and Priyanka were born citizens of Italy. Actually it is worse. Says Rashid Kidwai, ''Senior party leaders said Gurumurthy's formulations were academic, even if true, and had no relevance.'' Almost an admission!

Yes, Rahul and Priyanka are Italian citizens by birth. Then Mr Sharma, if they are Congress members by birth, are they not also Italians by birth?

😆
syrene thumbnail
Anniversary 18 Thumbnail Group Promotion 3 Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
Does anyone know that Feroze Gandhi --Indira Gandhi's Husband and the man to which the current dynasty owe their misleading surname had to change his name from Feroze Gandhy to Feroze Gandhi(the Parsi spelling was amended, at Nehru's suggestion, to blur his different belonging)???Edited by winnie_pooh - 17 years ago
TheRowdiest thumbnail
Anniversary 18 Thumbnail Group Promotion 7 Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 17 years ago

Originally posted by: winnie_pooh

Does anyone know that Feroze Gandhi --Indira Gandhi's Husband and the man to which the current dynasty owe their misleading surname had to change his name from Feroze Gandhy to Feroze Gandhi(the Parsi spelling was amended, at Nehru's suggestion, to blur his different belonging)???

winnie what I know abt this is that Nehru was against Indra's marriage to Firoze bcz he was Parsi .then Mahatma Gandhi adopted him & said to Nehru that now he is my son ,let Indra got marry to him.then Nehru agreed 4 da marriage & thats why they always use their surname Gandhi. in reality Gandhi is not thair actual surname.

Edited by Rajeev Ki Heer - 17 years ago
syrene thumbnail
Anniversary 18 Thumbnail Group Promotion 3 Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
He was actually a gujarati parsi is what i believe
TheRowdiest thumbnail
Anniversary 18 Thumbnail Group Promotion 7 Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 17 years ago

Originally posted by: winnie_pooh

He was actually a gujarati parsi is what i believe

yes he was a parsi I have confirmed it.