Posted: 19 November 2012 at 8:26am | IP Logged
Originally posted by sashashyam
Far from your going overboard, I think these kind so details are really important, especially when they concern the core issue, not a peripheral one. As is the point about the transplant being done intravenously, and the OT thus not being needed. All that they had to do was to consult an oncologist, even on the phone. Are both the donor and the recipient needed for the pre-transplant procedures or only the recipient?
Only the recipient has to undergo the pre-transplant procedures.
You know, you should mention point like these in kashishk's poll on each episode in Forum 32 of the IF. The CVs might then learn something, and that might help for the future.
Edited by S.Stephy - 19 November 2012 at 8:27am