Originally posted by: -FSH-
Why 90s?? In Hollywood actress almost work until they are 60.
Ameesha is turning or is about 36-37, where juhi reached this age a career was taking a downfall, where Ameesha at this age is facing a reverse and facing a rise.That is the difference. 90s pfff...?
Hahahahaha... Is that your defense? Hahahahaha!! My dear, let me show you the difference.
Juhi started off her career in the mid 80s. Her first film came out in 86. She got her first hit in 88. She was the ONLY actress, back in the day, that gave Madhuri a neck-to-neck competition (of course, Sridevi was always there). Check her career roster - and quick! There's not need to compare Juhi to Amisha or bring in the Hollywood angle. Amisha doesn't even stand a chance to the so-so Sonali, let alone Juhi. Juhi went on to work for half of the 80s and the rest of the 90s. She never looked back and was power-packed with her roles and offers. In the case of Amisha, she declined a couple of years after her overly hyped Gadar and Humraaz. Then what? Where was she?
So now that she returns back after so many years - for you - that qualifies for a reverse rise! Oh, please! A woman who became unemployed in her peak is now trying it hard to pass as a babe in her later years. That's just great! Juhi is still working in the industry, and is doing roles that suit her. She went from being a damsel in distress to a character artiste.
Sorry, but you need to get your facts straight - and even better, a reality check! Good luck. Now who are you gonna compare her to - Kareena?
comment:
p_commentcount