Posted: 01 November 2012 at 3:04am | IP Logged
We all know that the contestants are not ''mentored" by the esteemed judges.They are not mentored by them. period.
They are " mentored " by one or two music [directors] gurus who are roped in by by the producers to select songs, and teach them, rehearse etc etc. the whole week before the recording takes place.
These are the guys working behind the camera with the contestants.
The judges just breeze in before the recording.
You cannot mentor a well prepared singer before the recording, can u?
Once during every show, we are shown a 3-5 min clipping of the contestants spending time with the mentors. shot just to show us
In this scenario, does it make sense to have teams?
All it produces is obvious partiality .
Though they would like us to believe otherwise.
We saw undermarking of contestants of their own team and overmarking of contestants of other teams, just to prove their so called impartiality.
Obvious example was SW asking preity to mark Arsh and then over ruling her 10 [ its a different issue he did not deserve it ] and then SM saying, see how impartial they are, they under marked their own contestant.
It was so obviously staged to prove a point
Do we need teams? Is it necessary ? team-wise?
I personally think we do not.
what do you guys think?
P. S- i think someone from SW team will be the winner this time
Edited by music-a-muse - 01 November 2012 at 3:05am