Suggestions / Comments

   

Edited: IF and Freedom Of Speech (Page 4)

Post Reply New Post

Page 4 of 25

Flora3333

IF-Sizzlerz

Flora3333

Joined: 12 May 2012

Posts: 16107

Posted: 10 September 2012 at 12:27am | IP Logged
Originally posted by kkksr

Originally posted by chaitra2011

Totally agreed. Truth is always bitter and what is the harm in accepting it? People can bash a negative character but not a positive character? What kind of rules are these? Why aren't there rules, like many have already mentioned on the various shocking OS/FF's being written where children as young as 9 read it. This forum has tuned into a political zone, where each post has a different set of rules. This needs to be made aware asap.

If they have rules i would request them to apply it to each and everyone and everything. 


Yes! Absolutely ridiculous!
1. Different rules on bashing negative and positive characters makes no sense.
2.  Who made the decision Anjali is a positive character? When most of the viewers see her as a negative character how can they enforce the rule that she is a positive character ???



Anjali is NOT a positive character anymore!
We should have the freedom to express our views- positive or negative- about any character!
What does this "no bashing of characters" mean???
Even if we're disappointed with a character, we should say only positive things about that character? How?
So basically, you are only allowed to praise the characters here, but if you feel something negative, you have to keep your mouth shut!

The following 6 member(s) liked the above post:

sprinklekkksrMaverick29dieforasrabracadabra-DKS-

Dear Guest, Being an unregistered member you are missing out on participating in the lively discussions happening on the topic "Edited: IF and Freedom Of Speech (Page 4)" in Suggestions / Comments forum. In addition you lose out on the fun interactions with fellow members and other member exclusive features that India-Forums has to offer. Join India's most popular discussion portal on Indian Entertainment. It's FREE and registration is effortless so JOIN NOW!

-Mentor-

IF-Rockerz

-Mentor-

Joined: 21 June 2012

Posts: 6034

Posted: 10 September 2012 at 12:39am | IP Logged
I agree with all of u. Anjali is not a +ve character so we should be allowed to say some cruel words abt her. And we r not bashing her we r just criticizing her. And i think there is a lot of diff bn criticizing n bashing.

The following 7 member(s) liked the above post:

sprinklekkksrMaverick29abracadabradieforasrFlora3333-DKS-

diya33

Senior Member

diya33

Joined: 10 February 2012

Posts: 895

Posted: 10 September 2012 at 12:47am | IP Logged
agree with u. but i think i m not going to watch the show any more. irritating to the end

The following 6 member(s) liked the above post:

Anita2011sprinklekkksrMaverick29meshasabracadabra

kkksr

Senior Member

kkksr

Joined: 06 June 2012

Posts: 488

Posted: 10 September 2012 at 12:50am | IP Logged
Originally posted by Didikisaut

I always had serious issues with the rules of IPK forum any post which is critical of the characters and especially Anjali is closed down for no reason whatsoever, is Anjali not a character??is she not a part of IPK??is she the one on the forum who cannot be named??

The rules need a serious review as frankly it is a discussion forum and not a fan club if the MOD's only want to hear praises/laurels than it must be strictly communicated to the members.

It is nothing but an Autocracy where by new rules are passed overnight and there is hardly any member involvement. If they have to continue with such form of dictatorship then I think the members strictly need to make a move out as it is unacceptable and against the very fundamentals of a public forum...


Yes,  This is not a fan club. We must be able to voice our opinion! Why is ok to criticize Shyam and not ok to criticize Anjali?

The following 4 member(s) liked the above post:

sprinklePreets19Flora3333-DKS-

kkksr

Senior Member

kkksr

Joined: 06 June 2012

Posts: 488

Posted: 10 September 2012 at 12:53am | IP Logged
Originally posted by llSidll

I agree with all of u. Anjali is not a +ve character so we should be allowed to say some cruel words abt her. And we r not bashing her we r just criticizing her. And i think there is a lot of diff bn criticizing n bashing.


Agree, the viewers see Anjali as a negative character (not our fault if the CVs failed in their execution!)  There is nothing positive about this character and we should be able to say that !

The following 2 member(s) liked the above post:

sprinkleFlora3333

kkksr

Senior Member

kkksr

Joined: 06 June 2012

Posts: 488

Posted: 10 September 2012 at 12:54am | IP Logged
Originally posted by diya33

agree with u. but i think i m not going to watch the show any more. irritating to the end


I have also stopped watching the show. Just come here for updates. But with all these new rules even the forum is just as irritating as the show.

The following 3 member(s) liked the above post:

diya33meshasKookiemonster

-Mentor-

IF-Rockerz

-Mentor-

Joined: 21 June 2012

Posts: 6034

Posted: 10 September 2012 at 1:00am | IP Logged
Originally posted by kkksr

Originally posted by llSidll

I agree with all of u. Anjali is not a +ve character so we should be allowed to say some cruel words abt her. And we r not bashing her we r just criticizing her. And i think there is a lot of diff bn criticizing n bashing.


Agree, the viewers see Anjali as a negative character (not our fault if the CVs failed in their execution!) There is nothing positive about this character and we should be able to say that !
yup. And even the mods r too young to understand these morals.

The following 6 member(s) liked the above post:

sprinklekkksrMaverick29-SI-KookiemonsterFlora3333

kkksr

Senior Member

kkksr

Joined: 06 June 2012

Posts: 488

Posted: 10 September 2012 at 1:07am | IP Logged
Originally posted by llSidll

Originally posted by kkksr

Originally posted by llSidll

I agree with all of u. Anjali is not a +ve character so we should be allowed to say some cruel words abt her. And we r not bashing her we r just criticizing her. And i think there is a lot of diff bn criticizing n bashing.


Agree, the viewers see Anjali as a negative character (not our fault if the CVs failed in their execution!) There is nothing positive about this character and we should be able to say that !


yup. And even the mods r too young to understand these morals.



Yes, You hit the nail on the head.  The mods  are too young to understand what Freedom of Speech means.

The following 5 member(s) liked the above post:

sprinkle-SI--Mentor-KookiemonsterFlora3333

Post Reply New Post

Go to top

Related Topics

  Topics Topic Starter Replies Views Last Post
Not Again

2

Favouriteofall 12 801 25 December 2011 at 9:44am
By -dreamz-
It's About Time; 1st Page Edited.

2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 27 28

sabrinaa. 220 8999 26 August 2009 at 4:09pm
By mango

Forum Quick Jump

Forum Category

Active Forums

Suggestions / Comments Topic Index

Limit search to this Forum only.

 

Disclaimer: All Logos and Pictures of various Channels, Shows, Artistes, Media Houses, Companies, Brands etc. belong to their respective owners, and are used to merely visually identify the Channels, Shows, Companies, Brands, etc. to the viewer. Incase of any issue please contact the webmaster.