Posted: 08 August 2012 at 11:43am | IP Logged
Originally posted by undisclosed
Originally posted by LoveAngel21
I think comparing RK'z chrctr wid ballu iz unfair bcz u r missing out da basic diffrnce b/w da two...ballu did wot he did purely as a sadist masochist,without rhyme or reazn...but RK ruined madhu for revenge bcz she sent him 2 jail...nd ny1 who hs any idea abt indian society wud kno dt 4 dayz in an india jail iz lik 400 yrz in hell!!...if he derived ny sadistic pleasure in humiliating her in public by making her out as his laila, didn't she also go out of her way to make sure he went to jail in da first place?(remember how nobody in mukund'z family wanted to pursue da case agnst RK,nd mukund only signed da FIR to impress madhu)
so comparing RK wid ballu wud be wrong in my opinion...
<div align="center">i see your point...but though he has a reason...it doesn't make it ok...he went to jail because he did something wrong...so he did deserve to go to jail...madhu did nothing wrong...his reason for revenge is basically because he didn't get his way as he is used to...and that may not be sadistic...but its pretty similar to ballu's reasoning for his mad behavior...</div>
there you cntradict urself dear!therez no 'reason' for madness...motive iz imp to judge any reaction...it wd be more appropriate if u sd madhu nd RK are similr bcz they believe passionately in their cause nd are extreme intheir reactions...if madhu was overzealous in sending RK to jail for mukund who was almost a stranger to her at da time, so wz RK in extracting revenge from her for his humiliation.
As for ballu, da only trait he shares wid RK iz selfishness, but dts a common trait among all rich ,powerful ppl in da whole wide world!