Iss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon

India-Forums

   
Iss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon
Iss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon

Crooner 1.16 :When the clock strikes 12 - Updtd (Page 18)

Divya1503 IF-Sizzlerz
Divya1503
Divya1503

Joined: 14 November 2011
Posts: 11962

Posted: 07 August 2012 at 1:09am | IP Logged
Originally posted by Omoraboti

Originally posted by Divya1503

http://www.india-forums.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=3134305

I was abt to put this question in my post!!!!Shocked n yeh lo mera first dose for today!!!ROFL ROFL
 
LOL .. i thought so too and chose to ignore ..it is IPK after all! Tongue
 
Hello Divs!!! Hug

hello farha di!!!Hug thats why even i dint mention it in mine!!!LOL LOL

The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:

Omoraboti

riti4u IF-Stunnerz
riti4u
riti4u

Joined: 29 August 2010
Posts: 27410

Posted: 07 August 2012 at 1:10am | IP Logged
@all- marriage talks have interested me now... I have one kostein...what proof they have for their marriage... just they themselves... I mean logically no witness..no photograph taken...nothing..if sum1 questions it...how cn they prove that they are married?

The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:

Omoraboti

beena14 IF-Sizzlerz
beena14
beena14

Joined: 09 September 2006
Posts: 14960

Posted: 07 August 2012 at 1:10am | IP Logged
Priya updated my post on pg 1 Hug
Nandalala IF-Rockerz
Nandalala
Nandalala

Joined: 08 September 2009
Posts: 5841

Posted: 07 August 2012 at 1:12am | IP Logged
Originally posted by riti4u

Hi Priya...just had little time today but cudnt resist cumin here... I agree with your thinking on regressive takes and showing woman and servant in that respect does irk you but I have different view on why it was necessary before that let me applaud you once again fr insightful take Clap..and always love your starting quote...
 
As for Dadi's behavior is concerned and treatment metted to story ,it was done with intent to show us what made up is Dadi of and it is necessary to show that to an extent to female protagonist as it serves two purpose- it wil give our hero a platform where he can fight for his wife's dignity and respect in house and secondly dadi can relate khushi with that past woman who was mentioned many times but not revealed yet...so her disliking will be more and will lead to revealation of past... Regarding Dadi's behavior towards word Servant ..well that is difference which shows what were malliks made of...yes it is some time too much to show it .. but it surfaces reality too that exists in certain parts of India.. With her behavior ,we cn establish how she must have either ruined her son's life with it..or her son wud have carried off those traits...
hope i made some sense with what I have written...LOL..I am feeling like spokesperson for GH..Shocked

Rits, as always, a thought provoking post!  I agree with you in part about the female protagonist and this set up...it comes to what Suvi earlier had mentioned--the aabla naari syndrome...the wife here needing someone to defend her dignity and garner her respect, although in Khushi's case it is absolutely unnecessary because she is more than capable of defending herself...but anyway, I give this one to the soch nayi at SP.  

But what I don't get is why is Dadi relating Khushi with anyone without even knowing anything about her?  Seems a little premature.  She hasn't really spoken to anyone other than to Anjali, and all her other statements prior to Anjali's arrival have had to do with naukar, aukat and shuddhi!Confused  So it seems quite deliberate on the CVs part to stuff this mentality down the audience's throat without much justification for it...Furthermore, Manorama's behavior today only condoned Dadi's words...and that is wrong on all levels!  Had she defended Khushi, I would have said that ok, this class & social distinction is just something to show the orthodox thought (yes, keeping with some parts of our country!) But here, the CVs are taking some liberties which I don't think is alright at this juncture...Just my 2 cents!

The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:

riti4u

Omoraboti IF-Sizzlerz
Omoraboti
Omoraboti

Joined: 09 February 2012
Posts: 10207

Posted: 07 August 2012 at 1:13am | IP Logged
Originally posted by riti4u

Originally posted by --Nishita--

Originally posted by Omoraboti

Ladies!
 
I was reading a post by Ruby (Redwine) in DC and suddenly had this thought. I hope someone can clarify!
 
Is any wedding valid without witness in Hinduism? In Islam, it is not. So I was just thinking if there is any possibility to question  the validity of their wedding (even if the contract thing does not get exposed) since Arnav will declare there were no witnesses??

As far as I know, the fire (Agni) is the prime witness...thats why in Hindu weddings, we say Agni ko sakshi maankar ...etc etc. It is a legal wedding...now we have only seen him tying the mangalsutra and put sindoor on her. The saath phere is as important as the other two. Dont know if they took the pheres...if not, then the wedding is not complete.
Hey Nishi...thats true only when we watch movies and show...Big smile..plain my POV but i guess society will not accept such marriage if it is done without any witness...otherwise if u see hindi movies they put sindoor and all accepted but Society does questions such a marriage...
 
We were not shown whether they had taken the pheras .. and there was no priest even. I wonder .. Personally, I would like it this way .. I mean, others not knowing about the contract and thus their little secret remains with them. But then again, we get the wedding Khushi deserves .. I dont know! I am all confused!!!

The following 2 member(s) liked the above post:

--Nishita--riti4u

--Nishita-- IF-Sizzlerz
--Nishita--
--Nishita--

Joined: 30 March 2009
Posts: 11689

Posted: 07 August 2012 at 1:15am | IP Logged
Originally posted by riti4u

Originally posted by --Nishita--

Originally posted by Omoraboti

Ladies!
 
I was reading a post by Ruby (Redwine) in DC and suddenly had this thought. I hope someone can clarify!
 
Is any wedding valid without witness in Hinduism? In Islam, it is not. So I was just thinking if there is any possibility to question  the validity of their wedding (even if the contract thing does not get exposed) since Arnav will declare there were no witnesses??

As far as I know, the fire (Agni) is the prime witness...thats why in Hindu weddings, we say Agni ko sakshi maankar ...etc etc. It is a legal wedding...now we have only seen him tying the mangalsutra and put sindoor on her. The saath phere is as important as the other two. Dont know if they took the pheres...if not, then the wedding is not complete.
Hey Nishi...thats true only when we watch movies and show...Big smile..plain my POV but i guess society will not accept such marriage if it is done without any witness...otherwise if u see hindi movies they put sindoor and all accepted but Society does questions such a marriage...

The society is called to bless the newly wed...yes, they end up being the witness. Yes, you are right when you say we need witnesses (even a court marriage demands for three witnesses) but I am not sure if people doubt the credibility of the marriage if no witness was present...if not anybody else, at least the pandit will be the witness. here in this case, I doubt there was any pandit...

About the Agni...it is not only in movies...almost all Hindu weddings are complete only when the bride and groom take the saath vachans together infront of the fireSmile

The following 2 member(s) liked the above post:

Omorabotiriti4u

Newbiesoapfan IF-Sizzlerz
Newbiesoapfan
Newbiesoapfan

Joined: 03 January 2012
Posts: 13019

Posted: 07 August 2012 at 1:17am | IP Logged
Updated on Page 2.
--Nishita-- IF-Sizzlerz
--Nishita--
--Nishita--

Joined: 30 March 2009
Posts: 11689

Posted: 07 August 2012 at 1:17am | IP Logged
Originally posted by riti4u

@all- marriage talks have interested me now... I have one kostein...what proof they have for their marriage... just they themselves... I mean logically no witness..no photograph taken...nothing..if sum1 questions it...how cn they prove that they are married?

They are living in sin...we know nothing has happened but others will think they are living in sinLOLLOLLOL

But yeah they have no proof...no wedding card, no photo, no witness, no pandit..

The following 2 member(s) liked the above post:

Omorabotiriti4u

Go to top

Related Topics

  Topics Author Replies Views Last Post
Wow..GOOD NEWS[TRP/TVR Updtd PG-2]

2 3

Author: CATZ..   Replies: 21   Views: 3365

CATZ.. 21 3365 07 December 2011 at 1:10am by gunayaar
kya khoje khushi -SBS, Ola la-SBB LINKS updtd

2 3

Author: adits7   Replies: 22   Views: 3670

adits7 22 3670 17 November 2011 at 10:45am by minuu
FF- *Maine pyaar kyun kiya* updtd prt 2

2

Author: Kokila11   Replies: 15   Views: 3002

Kokila11 15 3002 28 October 2011 at 8:43am by Kokila11
SBS- Khushi with Bauji in Hospital updtd

2 3 4

Author: tanthya   Replies: 26   Views: 4958

tanthya 26 4958 13 October 2011 at 7:06am by rechus
ArHi~Cupid strikes!! :P

2

Author: -Sanjana-   Replies: 14   Views: 1772

-Sanjana- 14 1772 20 July 2011 at 2:30pm by senorzorro12

Forum Quick Jump

Forum Category / Channels
Forums

Iss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon Topic Index

Check these Celebrity also

Disclaimer: All Logos and Pictures of various Channels, Shows, Artistes, Media Houses, Companies, Brands etc. belong to their respective owners, and are used to merely visually identify the Channels, Shows, Companies, Brands, etc. to the viewer. Incase of any issue please contact the webmaster.

Popular Channels :
Star Plus | Zee TV | Sony TV | Colors TV | SAB TV | Life OK

Quick Links :
Top 100 TV Celebrities | Top 100 Bollywood Celebs | About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | Forum Index