Debate Mansion

India-Forums

   
Debate Mansion
Debate Mansion

If you believe in God, refute this! (Page 147)

Beyond_the_Veil IF-Sizzlerz

Joined: 12 February 2008
Posts: 11413

Posted: 08 December 2012 at 11:34pm | IP Logged
THE ACCOUNT OF THE MEMBER WHO POSTED THIS MESSAGE HAS BEEN TEMPORARILY BANNED.

If you think this is an error please Contact us.

K.Universe. Goldie
K.Universe.
K.Universe.

Joined: 02 September 2012
Posts: 2006

Posted: 08 December 2012 at 11:43pm | IP Logged
Originally posted by Beyond_the_Veil

Yeah, that's why agnostic theism works perfectly from me. I don't know but I believe. LOL


I think you are an ignostic (like me) considering you too wouldn't answer the question whether God exists unless a working definition of God is provided that is acceptable to all.
Beyond_the_Veil IF-Sizzlerz

Joined: 12 February 2008
Posts: 11413

Posted: 09 December 2012 at 2:23am | IP Logged
THE ACCOUNT OF THE MEMBER WHO POSTED THIS MESSAGE HAS BEEN TEMPORARILY BANNED.

If you think this is an error please Contact us.
K.Universe. Goldie
K.Universe.
K.Universe.

Joined: 02 September 2012
Posts: 2006

Posted: 09 December 2012 at 9:29am | IP Logged
Originally posted by Beyond_the_Veil


I agree though. Is it possible to find the existence of something when we don't even know what that something is?

It's like trying to find XYZ.

"Does XYZ exist?"
"Well what is XYZ?"

I think anthropomorphic versions of God/gods can easily be dismissed as man-made depictions. Depending on the definition, people will perceive it differently.

But I think a narrow definition of God from various philosophies and religions can be deduced. 'First uncaused cause' is the narrowest it can get.


Hate to nitpick but why did you use three variables? That adds to the confusion :) You could have simply added:
"Does X exist?"
"Well what is X?"

Yes, "what is it?" is a fundamental question. The problem is we can only understand what that is in terms of what we know. We know energy/matter (elements), we know forces (gravitation, electromagnetism, strong and weak nuclear forces), we know space and we know time. Actually, even these are not very well understood but we pretend that we understand them anyway.

So, whenever we come across a concept like God, we try to break it down into terms we know and understand. Is that energy/matter? Is that a force? Is that consciousness (yet another catch-all phrase)?

And, the biggest constraint of all is that none of the above mentioned can exist outside the dimensions of space-time. To us that is. In fact, that is where even our language breaks down, not to mention the carefully constructed physical laws, the logic, the math. Simply put, "Outside" is a word that cannot penetrate space-time.

So here's the puzzle (understatement by the way): we know that everything, and by that I mean every single darn thing, dissolves into a singularity, where space-time, energy/matter and forces were all united (read mathematically integrated). To us, it is a state.  That was the state that the universe was in. To understand what that state is, we start breaking it into terms we understand (mathematically differentiating). So what's the puzzle?! Well, to understand what that is, should we integrate further or differentiate? As a simple analogy: brass is an alloy of copper and zinc. Are we supposed to understand brass as brass or are we supposed to understand Brass as a mix of copper and zinc in some proportions, and copper and zinc themselves in terms of their atomic weights and electron configurations and so on?

As a visual, you can imagine you have a tiny lens in your hand and there is something gigantic in front of you, all around you, that you proceeded to examine with your lens. Let's call that something God. How would you analyze what you have in front of you, all around you? By taking in that something as a whole or by traversing your lens on that something, part by part, atom by atom? Remember the goal is to understand everything, and holding that everything in your brain as one single thought. And this single thought should have the explanation for you as well, not just everything but you.

But then what is that thought? What is it composed of? There we go, differentiating again.

It's a vicious cycle!



Freethinker112 IF-Sizzlerz
Freethinker112
Freethinker112

Joined: 16 May 2012
Posts: 13742

Posted: 09 December 2012 at 10:00am | IP Logged
Originally posted by K.Universe.

Originally posted by Freethinker112

Originally posted by Beyond_the_Veil

Can God create a mountain so heavy that he cannot lift it? If he can lift it, then he couldn't have made it THAT heavy - this is a blow to his omnipotence. If he can make it that heavy that it becomes impossible for him to lift it, then he has never been omnipotent to begin with.

This is something I have just recently come across. There are some explanations found on the paradox in the net too, will have to look it up.

I read that in some article, long time ago. Paradox of omnipotent. Would link but the site is down. I have the three pages article saved to my disk.

The theists then claim God is beyond logic. He is beyond science too. And he is beyond human understanding too. But yeah, they definitely know he exists. Smells like another paradox to me. LOL



It's easy to pick apart most paradoxes including the "omnipotent paradox" presented here if only one is willing to spend a couple of minutes thinking. Sadly, most people refuse to think for fear of getting taxed.

BTW, theists claiming that God definitely exists is not that different from atheists claiming that God definitely doesn't exist.

How do you pick apart this one? That's a sincere question, not a joke or sarcasm. Smile

Yeah, atheism is a bit extreme too. I personally can't say with 100% certainty, as there might be a possibility that such an entity exists. So, my personal take is unless we encounter such an being, I consider it nonexistent for all practical purposes..
Freethinker112 IF-Sizzlerz
Freethinker112
Freethinker112

Joined: 16 May 2012
Posts: 13742

Posted: 09 December 2012 at 10:06am | IP Logged
@K

Can't he use a three character variable? Wink LOL

BTW, you raise a good question. When do we say we have understood a thing? At the smallest level, full differentiated, or at the highest level, fully integrated. I think maybe we  can say we know things when we know every step of the process. Like the math textbooks. You see the question and you may peek at the answer in the back, but unless you can go through the whole process, you have not understood the thing.

And how did we get the function to differentiate and integrate? Who is creating the functions? Who is writing the books?
Beyond_the_Veil IF-Sizzlerz

Joined: 12 February 2008
Posts: 11413

Posted: 09 December 2012 at 11:20am | IP Logged
THE ACCOUNT OF THE MEMBER WHO POSTED THIS MESSAGE HAS BEEN TEMPORARILY BANNED.

If you think this is an error please Contact us.
return_to_hades IF-Sizzlerz
return_to_hades
return_to_hades

Joined: 18 January 2006
Posts: 24060

Posted: 09 December 2012 at 11:36am | IP Logged
Originally posted by K.Universe.


Hate to nitpick but why did you use three variables? That adds to the confusion :)


He was making sure to cover all three - father, son and holy ghost.

Go to top

Related Topics

  Topics Author Replies Views Last Post
Do you believe there is a God ?

2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 88 89

Author: Summer3   Replies: 705   Views: 52771

Summer3 705 52771 18 November 2012 at 11:22pm by Summer3
do u believe in theory of karma?

2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 11 12

Author: monika.   Replies: 94   Views: 8951

monika. 94 8951 20 September 2011 at 11:49am by thegameison
Believe in prophecies ? Rome to tumble 11 May

2

Author: Summer3   Replies: 10   Views: 1211

Summer3 10 1211 12 May 2011 at 4:20am by Summer3
Do you believe in "paranormal things"?

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Author: SolidSnake   Replies: 71   Views: 7535

SolidSnake 71 7535 17 September 2010 at 1:42am by _Angie_
Do you believe in fairytales?

2

Author: shalini1323   Replies: 11   Views: 1224

shalini1323 11 1224 27 April 2010 at 11:41pm by -Believe-

Forum Quick Jump

Forum Category / Channels
Forums

Debate Mansion Topic Index

  • Please login to check your Last 10 Topics posted

Disclaimer: All Logos and Pictures of various Channels, Shows, Artistes, Media Houses, Companies, Brands etc. belong to their respective owners, and are used to merely visually identify the Channels, Shows, Companies, Brands, etc. to the viewer. Incase of any issue please contact the webmaster.

Popular Channels :
Star Plus | Zee TV | Sony TV | Colors TV | SAB TV | Life OK

Quick Links :
Top 100 TV Celebrities | Top 100 Bollywood Celebs | About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | Forum Index