If you believe in God, refute this! (Page 143)

Post Reply New Post

Next Topic

Prev Topic

_Angie_

IF-Rockerz

Joined: 21 February 2008

Posts: 9589

Posted: 01 November 2012 at 7:11am | IP Logged

Howdy Ninja boy ! You are just in time for the closing ceremony

The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:

zorrro,

Dear Guest, Being an unregistered member you are missing out on participating in the lively discussions happening on the topic "If you believe in God, refute this! (Page 143)" in Debate Mansion forum. In addition you lose out on the fun interactions with fellow members and other member exclusive features that India-Forums has to offer. Join India's most popular discussion portal on Indian Entertainment. It's FREE and registration is effortless so JOIN NOW!

zorrro

Goldie

Joined: 29 July 2008

Posts: 1672

Posted: 01 November 2012 at 10:41am | IP Logged

Edited by zorrro - 01 November 2012 at 10:48am

Vintage.Wine

Senior Member

Joined: 03 July 2012

Posts: 863

Posted: 01 November 2012 at 11:58am | IP Logged

Originally posted by K.Universe.

Originally posted by BirdieNumNum

Reason I brought up the subject of fields was to "resolve" electron indistinguishability.

And, as an afterthought, I wanted to emphasize the importance of fields from the point of view of disturbances happening in those fields; these disturbances are nothing but "virtual particles". Your statement about empty space creating matter / anti-matter of course deals with these very disturbances that I was talking about!

To understand "real particles" we need to understand why the vacuum state is unstable enough to produce these disturbances ("virtual particles"). These form the bridge between the "something" that is the physical universe and the "nothing" that is the vacuum (free space). To get to "nothing", the disturbances in fields have to be fleshed out.

K .... Tongue

@ Bold Blue: Because..Vacuum has energy ... As far as I understand that, the Virtual particles exist due to Vacuum Energy's density that produces the short wavelength electromagnetic noise .. And the Asymmetry is engendered when they exist in the event horizon of a black hole ( And absorbed there within Planck's time ) .

So I believe even the virtual particles creation is an implication of this underlying energy ( It's density ) ..the source of which again remains unknown ... ..So back to the square one .. Ouch

Vintu .. Stern Smile

Ps. The Energy element is difficult to get rid of.

Vintage.Wine

Senior Member

Joined: 03 July 2012

Posts: 863

Posted: 01 November 2012 at 12:27pm | IP Logged

Originally posted by Freethinker112

Originally posted by BirdieNumNum

Actually, it was upto Vintu to prove because he has been going on and on about energy creating us, but still let's analyse what I said.

Energy creating itself. How can something create itself? Creation means something coming into existence which did not exist before. Creation of energy means energy coming into existence and it did not exist before that. So, if it did not exist prior to its creation, how can it create itself? It cannot.

Creation was in the sense that theists use. Of course we possess energy and our body needs energy to be alive. But the matter of our body possess energy, it didn't create us.

Free ... LOL

@ Bold: I bet what I have been saying all along was not a double entendre ...Each time you get back after exiling ( Away from DM ) for a few days, you interpret the same lines in a different way .. LOL

..and come up with a newer skit .. LOL

All that I had said was ...We are the PART of the energy ...Not that the energy created us.. Every single electron in your body has associated energy ( The same energy) ..Now does that sound wrong?

You were saying that the Brain is the creator of everything ..Vitality and consciousness...

Now to your analysis ..Energy can't be created or destroyed ...But the newer hypothesis suggests that the total energy in the universe is ZERO ..Cause the positive energy in the matter is negated by the negative energy of the gravity ..But actual annihilation process is time consuming ..So we can assume that the energy doesn't exist ..We as a product of matter ...get to see the illusion of our existence before our delayed destruction...But all matter would be eventually negated ...ascertaining the Cyclic nature of the universe ...

Which again means that we are moving both forward and backward in time ( In wider scope of that word ) and there is no beginning or an end to anything ..

Vintu ...

K.Universe.

Senior Member

Joined: 02 September 2012

Posts: 534

Posted: 01 November 2012 at 12:41pm | IP Logged

OK, it's imperative to parse these two sentences:

1. An electron has charge
2. A photon has energy

When you say has, is it inside the electron/photon or enveloping the electron/photon?

if inside the electron/photon, where exactly?

If enveloping the electron/photon, how much radius?

This is where we get into force fields and lines of force, FYI.

So, going back to the statement from previous posts, if space has energy, then what is the field of that?!

If space is all that there is, then the field can't extend outside of space now, can it? How is it possible then to "contain" that energy within?

Back to the drawing board, people!

Vintage.Wine

Senior Member

Joined: 03 July 2012

Posts: 863

Posted: 02 November 2012 at 8:47am | IP Logged

Originally posted by K.Universe.

OK, it's imperative to parse these two sentences:

1. An electron has charge
2. A photon has energy

When you say has, is it inside the electron/photon or enveloping the electron/photon?

if inside the electron/photon, where exactly?

If enveloping the electron/photon, how much radius?

This is where we get into force fields and lines of force, FYI.

So, going back to the statement from previous posts, if space has energy, then what is the field of that?!

If space is all that there is, then the field can't extend outside of space now, can it? How is it possible then to "contain" that energy within?

Back to the drawing board, people!

K...

@ Bold 1: ....I think its the Property of those particles ...Hence it can't be inside or outside ..Its everywhere ...Like Consciousness in the property of a living being ...and its everywhere ..all locations ..

@ Bold 2: Its the vacuum...thats expanding ...Although the energy of the density within would remain constant ..The cosmical constant that cause the galactic / stellar redshifts ...

And this vacuum field must be limited not Infinite..as derived from the cosmic constant ..the event horizon of the universe is 16 billion light years away ..So the accelerating mass / galaxies would escape that and the massive redshift might change their wavelengths to undetectable levels ..

My point is ... Vacuum has energy ...The Universe ( Observable ) has a horizon /a Virtual boundary ...So a state emptier than the vacuum ..which has ZERO density must exist beyond that ..And may be trillions of light years away from that another universe with vacuum with density might exist ...

Those galaxies that escape the current universe might exist in another universe after many trillion years .. Ouch

OR

If we ccnsider the flat / single infinite and open universe ...due to constantly decreasing mass of the vacuum, matter nuff to make more stars would exhaust ..The stars would emit all their energy and turn into black holes as the protons would decay..Black holes would
eventually disappear ...and what ll remain will be NEAR NOTHING ... LOL

Vintu ...

K.Universe.

Senior Member

Joined: 02 September 2012

Posts: 534

Posted: 02 November 2012 at 10:41am | IP Logged

Vintu, I was enunciating from the point of view of field lines and how the so called properties influence the regions of space around them

An electron has charge; it's a point particle as we know with no spatial extent. Yet, the lines of force influence the region of space around it.

My question was more related to the energy space itself has. What is the region of influence for the spatial energy? I think it gets circular to define the region in terms of the same region which has energy.

As for the cosmological constant, I think you are on the right track there even though what you said wasn't completely clear to me.

In short, I am looking into what exactly it means when someone says "vacuum energy". And what does that in turn mean in at the quantum scale.

K.Universe.

Senior Member

Joined: 02 September 2012

Posts: 534

Posted: 02 November 2012 at 10:58am | IP Logged

It is possible that this is the reason space is expanding at the "outermost edges".

I think we need to separate space and energy. Space has energy is not a true statement IMO. Whatever is expanding the space is also a type of energy ("dark energy") as they put it, which means there is energy (first and foremost) and one "type" of it is responsible for "creation" of space (even though scientists deliberately avoid the word creation and prefer "expansion".

The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:

Vintage.Wine,

Page 143 of 150
« previous
1
2
...
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
...
149
150
next»

Post Reply New Post

Go to top

Topics	Topic Starter	Replies	Views	Last Post
Do you believe there is a God ? 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 89 90	Summer3	719	25562	18 November 2012 at 10:26pm By Summer3
do u believe in theory of karma? 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 11 12	monika.	94	3296	20 September 2011 at 7:45am By epiphany.
Believe in prophecies ? Rome to tumble 11 May 2	Summer3	10	632	12 May 2011 at 8:24pm By Summer3
Do you believe in "paranormal things"? 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9	SolidSnake	71	3069	17 September 2010 at 10:25am By _Angie_
Do you believe in fairytales? 2	shalini1323	11	552	27 April 2010 at 10:33am By Prometeus

If you believe in God, refute this! (Page 143)

Page 143 of 150

Posted: 01 November 2012 at 7:11am | IP Logged

Posted: 01 November 2012 at 10:41am | IP Logged

Posted: 01 November 2012 at 11:58am | IP Logged

Posted: 01 November 2012 at 12:27pm | IP Logged

Posted: 01 November 2012 at 12:41pm | IP Logged

Posted: 02 November 2012 at 8:47am | IP Logged

Posted: 02 November 2012 at 10:41am | IP Logged

Posted: 02 November 2012 at 10:58am | IP Logged

Related Topics

Forum Quick Jump

Forum Search

Join India-forums Today!

Here's why members would love to be a part of India-Forums.com:

Join Us Close