IP REDUX; Alaap ...Second Thread !! - Page 13

This content was originally posted by: Arhimaniac

Agree with anjali barging in chottes room wrong...could have been shown she witnessed from terrace...or living room if they wanted to make sure that she did not listen to the conversation...

Agree that NK barging in to see khushi sleeping or not...not correct...you cannot do that...its unethical

and another thing...did you guys hear NK's dialogs yesterday...

Nanav tum ne USKO wish kiya?? USKE liye kiya kiya..blah blah

NK always calls khushi as aap and unhon ne 

ab yeh usko kab se hogaya...

minor minor cheezain jama hoker poora picture khraab kerdeti hain...😕

This content was originally posted by: tanthya

@ Bold...This I agree with   and I would say then  that it will come under the PH ambit or the channel's ambit  [ who sanctions the interview]  ...if they think the actor may not be handle the pressure or is under too much pressure ..then they must  keep a curfew in place until the anger blows over ...


 A thought for Abhaas who faced vitriolic hatred  in FB  and yet smiled his way thru it  instead of crumbling ...I wonder how he did it..

This content was originally posted by: redwine1

Completely agree with you .. i have dedicated pages of posts on simple approach .. camera & lighting most of the times is way off ... I am shocked how a veteran camera person .. after 1 + years woking with these actors still doesnt know their good side ..

They r no banking .. because they r changing the line .. as v speak .. if the script is followed to the T ..or the track is laid our in advance .. then they can bank .. ab kya khaak bank karenge jab AK ko pata nahi hai .. track kahan jaa raha hai ..actor dates ka thikana nahi hai . 

I critique him sometimes .. but i understand where he is coming from as well .. the constraints

This content was originally posted by: sree07

Meghs... ditto...

I even made a post on it.

If the character onscreen can not gather sympathy then why try outside to pull in fans for that character? Let the CVs do the job on screen.

I am tired of this foot notes released by PH via tweets\IF posts\interviews\buzz articles to gather sympathy for anjali. Isn't it something which should be done in the serial?

When ASR married khushi, forum nearly blasted him but BS did not get any hate mails And BS did not have to explain either why ASR did that. We understood. CVs succeeded in conveying the message to us onscreen. If it is not happening with Anji, then whom to blame?

This content was originally posted by: nancynair

Tants, Reduxians  please help , I am confused at Daljeets take on fan reaction-


The reason truth came out was because for the first time Shyam attempted to murder-Khushi, NK saw that part of his intent.

Arnav too saw that he was about to be killed.
Khushi was also left to die.


The kidnap murder drama went on for 45 days...

The duo saved themselves,

Shyam was ousted,Anjali is shattered...

The viewers knew this was coming for the last whole year...

How can the PH expect symapthy to be more for Anji and not Arshi.?

The duo were dying , wheras Anjali's dream died right?

The reveal then should have been different right, or Shyam should have bungled, like he did with ether in the kidnap drama so that the vierwers felt that he was bound to fail , and the threat was not that real.

This content was originally posted by: sree07

I am not saying that people are right in sending the mails, naresh. My point is that viewers maturity levels vary. If a 14 year old girl sends a 'hate mail' to DB, can you actually blame that young girl? No. She is just immature. But the person who acts, who has the understanding of the character and flow of story handle it in a mature way. She should be able to filter her 'inbox' .

Its the same thing happened to GH. He got lot of bashing tweets from few realyl crazy fan girls and he reacted which was an immature act. See akshay...People say what all things about Aakash on his tmeline. He never reacts.