Posted:
- Duplicate post deleted-
ShivangOne reason I don't support the 22 avatar theory is that you have too many clones of Vishnu operating @ the same time. Incidentally, who was Dhanvantari?Why can't that be possible? Vishnu is infinite. Only bodies are two (Ram-Parshuram or Krishna-Balram or whatever). If he can take crores of ignorant bodies simultaneously then why not two divine enlightened bodies of kalaas more than 10 at the same time? And it's not theory but SB part quoted in this thread and often explained by Varaali. Haven't you opened those links posted by me? That too explained all the avatars. Dhanvantari is one of them who came out of the ocean at last with Amritkumbh while it was being churned and asuras went after him.If one goes by the Dasha avatar theory, no 2 avatars of Vishnu were active @ any one time. Kurma ended and then Mohini started, and so there was no overlap. As for Rama & Parashurama, I've read 2 theories about that. One is that when Parashurama accosted Rama after the latter's marriage while they were returning from Mithila to Ayodhya and Rama strung Vishnu's bow as requested, Vishnu's avatar ended in Parashurama and got transferred completely to Rama. The other one I've read is that when Kashyap ordered Parashurama to stop his massacre of Kshatriyas, that was when his incarnation ended. If one believes that Rama was born the avatar of Vishnu, then the latter explanation covers how Vishnu's incarnation could have ended in Parashurama & begun w/ Rama. Yet, another school of thought speculates that Parashurama was not a complete avatar the way any of the others were.The other theory seems to be more understandable that Parashuram already gave away his Vishnu element to Ram when latter was born (Tadka vadh - Ahalya uddhar- Dhanurbhang - all are the evidences) but realized only late.And if RLBS and KB are considered parts of the same avatar, then there is no case of multiple avatars co-existing. That only becomes the scenario under the 22 avatar case.And one more thing to be asked. Was Bharat the incarnation of Shankh and not Chakra??? I thought it was Bharat not Shatrughna!One thing that Varaali mentioned above about Buddhism - if his followers have changed the color of his teachings to make it a different religion completely different from Hinduism... Question - are they the ones 'guilty' of doing it, or was that how it started and was meant to be? On one hand, in countries like Nepal, Buddhism is virtually indistinguishable from Hinduism, and the respect of Hindu deities is even seen to a lesser extent in Thailand and Cambodia. Whereas in Tibet, Bhutan, Mongolia, Myanmar, Sri Lanka, the Buddhism that they follow is by no stretch of imagination Hindu. And like I pointed out, unlike Christianity, which has a place of honor for the Old Testament but rejects Jewish books like the Torah and Talmud, Buddhism doesn't accord any importance to Hindu scriptures at all, be they Vedas or Puranas, and by most modern definitions, would qualify as being a completely different religion from Hinduism just like Sikhism is (the modern definition look @ whether 2 religions respect the same scriptures to determine and define whether one is a derivative or variation of the other)Jains and Sikhs do keep the idols of Ganesh in particular in their homes and they even don't mind worshiping Ganesh. There are also Jain Purans having mention of Krishna, Ram, Sita, Hanuman, Ravan (in fact there is entire Ramayan of Padma Kalp in Padma Puran) but Jainism beliefs about Ram, Ravan & Krishna are very very weird. It's difficult to recall and write it over here but you can search with the words 'Jain Tirthankar Ravan' and this way 'Jain Tirthankar Ram' and 'Hanuman in Jainism', 'Krishna in Jainism' if you are curious. So even same Hindu deities accepted to be existed but with different significance or different interpretations or weird events would also raise questions whether despite same deities worshiped, are the religions same? But what we have to see then are the common values with Hinduism (and that is Ahinsa and Dhyan in case of both Jainism and Buddhism and Gurubhakti and Protection of people/dharma/nation in Sikhism).
ShivangOne reason I don't support the 22 avatar theory is that you have too many clones of Vishnu operating @ the same time. Incidentally, who was Dhanvantari?I don't think any of the avatars even in the set of 22 overlapped one another.In the 10 avatars, Dhanvantri wouldn't be in the list. I brought up Mohini b'cos after Kurma's job was done, hers began. The other 12 on the list I wasn't considering in this analysis.All the more, Dhanvantri should be on the list. HAd it not been for Dhanvantri, Mohini would have had no job to do at all.
Incidentally, who was Dhanvantari?Dhanvantri was the one who emerged from the depths of the milky ocean with the pot of amrita in his hands.Incidentally, Dhanvantri is regarded as an avatar of Vishnu with full rights to worship, homa (havan - in hindi) and puja. Dhanvantri is also considered to be a divine physician / doctor / remover of all illnesses.It is common to conduct a Dhanvantri puja / homa before occupying a newly built house (to ensure that all family members keep good health.)The maha mantra for Dhanvantri is like this :Om Namo Bhagavate Vaasudevaya DhanvantrayeAmrita Kalasha Hastaya Sarva amaya vinaashanayaTrilokanaathaya Shri Maha Vishnave namaha(Salutations to Dhanvantri and who has the pot of amrit in his hands and who cures all illnesses. Salutations to Him who is the Lord of the three worlds and who is a form of Vishnu)That Dhanvantri is acknowledged as a full avatar is clear from the above mantra since he is credited with the "Om namo Bhagavate... " mantra.Though temples for him are rare, I have been to a Dhanvantri temple near Chennai, where the Lord has a silver stethoscope, probably offered by a grateful devotee.
I don't think any of the avatars even in the set of 22 overlapped one another.How? When Dhanvantari came out of the ocean being churned, Kurma must still be there due to very fact that ocean was being churned until Dhanvantari emerged. Vyas and Krishna (possibly Ram too!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!) overlapped. Parashuram overlapped with every subsequent avatar (we may ignore this fact because of the theory of Vishnu leaving Parashuram before Ramavatar). And most important question of all - what about Krishna and Balram? What about Narad?All the more, Dhanvantri should be on the list. HAd it not been for Dhanvantri, Mohini would have had no job to do at all.Totally agree.In fact I have been thinking- what was the basis on which the Dasha Avatar got shortlisted from the larger set of 22? Because it mirrors Darwin's theory of evolution?Exactly. Same doubt here.
How? When Dhanvantari came out of the ocean being churned, Kurma must still be there due to very fact that ocean was being churned until Dhanvantari emerged. Vyas and Krishna (possibly Ram too!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!) overlapped. Parashuram overlapped with every subsequent avatar (we may ignore this fact because of the theory of Vishnu leaving Parashuram before Ramavatar). And most important question of all - what about Krishna and Balram? What about Narad?
comment:
p_commentcount