IP REDUX; Alaap !! - Page 53 | Iss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon

Panache

@ppanache

IF-Sizzlerz

Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: doodleberry

yahin hoon Shreeya ... tu bol ??? 😃 and whats your views on IPK now??? instigate me 😆

If i truly tell you what sucks...people here might throw chappals at me!! 😆

But here is what i have not liked so far

1. Shyam being chucked out with not even one shred of evidence!! (kuch bhi!!). Arnav basing his actions just on the trust he has on kushi...(Couldn't digest this at all). What happened to his brains..Also, what was the delay in him getting inside the house if actions were purely based on trust!! 😲

2. Kushi going of to GH and all the nakraas...brings back memories of the terrible OTT track!!! you can reject all his actions 2 times, at the max 3 times...but this is just getting to much on my nerves...

3. Characters are Yo - Yo ing so much!! NK is the only one who is consistent!! Now, that should tell you how i really feel! if i say that NK was consistent!😆

10

Reply

Quote

439193

Inactive

Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: Nareshkota
why to ponder this much on TRP..

Right now the need of the hour is scrutiny of future tracks for PH...

They will undergo serious discussions for all their future plans..

No body likes seeing a drop in Trps...

Man when Kidnap drama could fetch TRPs up to 2.8 then how come this week episodes fetch 2.0..

Just thinks guys don't worry that is false..

Wholly agree to this..we got our GH on work again ..So lets get back to what we do best..Plot how it shud go, how it can be turned better , what we want to see etc ??

TRP is 3 BTW

7

Reply

Quote

nivedha84

@nivedha84

IF-Dazzler

Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: doodleberry

Naa Anjali will make it happen as I see ... and it shuld be a good wedding but budget hain toh ... otherwise donno .. symbolic kyun hogi ??? now we dont need that ... 😡

i asked u bcoz i read loads of post in redux speculating on symbolic wedding ,i wanted a Big Fat wedding with all the rituals,haldi,sangeet,mehandi,varmaala,pheras,shaadi,SR and most importantly Khushi at GH,ASR sneaking in😉 to meet hi ladylove😳

9

Reply

Quote

twisted_beenz

@twisted_beenz

IF-Rockerz

+ 2

Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: tanthya

Tring, Tring

What an interesting life U lead !! 😃

Oh god hilarious. trin... read mine couple of pages ago... nahin mila to I will paste it here for you

behena vey...

3

Reply

Quote

Lizzy2012

@Lizzy2012

IF-Rockerz

+ 4

Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: redwine1

I told u yesterday itself .. if that was ur & Koel's interpretation .. specially Koel since she watches the episode as a lay viewer .. hence i really LOVE her takes .. & i learn from it ..

Then there is a HUGE ERROR .. that is why i was stumped ...
yesterday another one which stumped me was AKASH bringing back Shyam to RM ..

IF any of this is what the LAY public is reading .then ????

C dont look at this week .. what u have to c is the mon / tues / wed of last week .. that is where the viewer decided to exit .. the HINT Of KHUSHI leaving ... Now POST ME .. see the TRP has increased .. that means .. public is OK with romance .. public interpretation of promo is ROMANCE ...

Hence last nite promo

I don't go only by my interpretation winey.. I also ask ppl around me how they felt.. See they dont view it ..like I do.. With full knowledge of the inside happenings.. My mother is usually a good indicator of the lay viewer..so she has been telling from last week about a split.. But after the ME she didn't

Like the way arhi would split.. Because of anji..I concurred with her yesterday that with my knowledge and her input.. The track would not be to the liking of the lay audience..see the average trp on the romance days are higher.. So what thecv's need to realise is that anji should merge with the romance of arhi and not the other way round..

4

Reply

Quote

Ash_Rajendra8

@Ash_Rajendra8

Goldie

Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: Lizzy2012

me doesn't count.. But that is indicator of the future track so .. That means.. The future track is not to the liking of the audience

just asking , what according to you is future track? Didi ka saut? which Gautam is hell bent on twitter .
then NO future in this case.😆

4

Reply

Quote

sree07

@sree07

IF-Rockerz

+ 5

Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: doodleberry

Shyam will be back with a blow ...wait and watch 😃

Shyam babua vapas aayega...😍

I am sending daily reminders to GH to get him back. It just reached reminder - 7. I have plans upto 200.

Btw GH said in the tweets that he has no take over the tracks. He gets the tracts and he put it down on paper😆

8

Reply

Quote

clarissajohn

@clarissajohn

IF-Sizzlerz

+ 3

Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: sunshine99
t🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣

LOL who ever watched the epi for the first time feel that asr is having an illicit affair with khushi and anji is her pathni 😆😆😆😆

3

Reply

Quote

sharmibalan

@sharmibalan

IF-Rockerz

Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: doodleberry

Sunvi ... hugzz 🤗

Kya janna chahti ho bolo ??? Lemme think on writing ... but discussions mein hoon naa ?? pooncho naa ???

I know u read sandy's post...Both u and sathya...deserve it...

Please make a comeback...

Just one analysis before the olympics...😉

Can you share any clues on future tracks...please?...Any hints did you get on tracks...

We saw lots of flowers, Nani was cutting apple for Anji...He wishes 5 mins before 12...😕

Edited by sharmibalan - 11 years ago

3

Reply

Quote

Panache

@ppanache

IF-Sizzlerz

Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: Nareshkota
why to ponder this much on TRP..

Right now the need of the hour is scrutiny of future tracks for PH...

They will undergo serious discussions for all their future plans..

No body likes seeing a drop in Trps...

Man when Kidnap drama could fetch TRPs up to 2.8 then how come this week episodes fetch 2.0..

Just thinks guys don't worry that is false..

Agreed Naresh...

PH really needs to buckle up! Now, Zeee is coming up with a love story at the same slot!

4

Reply

Quote