India-Forums

   

The Winner Of Survivor India Is...(SPOILER) (Page 3)

kameshreddy Goldie
kameshreddy
kameshreddy

Joined: 04 November 2011
Posts: 1281

Posted: 11 March 2012 at 11:00pm | IP Logged
Full Details click here

I am love to see final

The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:

Awari_Maan

Awari_Maan IF-Rockerz
Awari_Maan
Awari_Maan

Joined: 22 June 2011
Posts: 7944

Posted: 12 March 2012 at 4:40am | IP Logged
congrates rajrani... u truly deserves to be number one...Clap
but i wanted abhinav to be the best... he is sooo cool headed n skillfull player.. nyway, best of luck abhi... keep rocking...Thumbs Up

The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:

VarshaLuvsArjun

Rafid. IF-Achieverz
Rafid.
Rafid.

Joined: 11 October 2011
Posts: 101209

Posted: 12 March 2012 at 5:36am | IP Logged
TFS
raspberrytorte IF-Rockerz
raspberrytorte
raspberrytorte

Joined: 11 February 2011
Posts: 6072

Posted: 12 March 2012 at 11:48am | IP Logged
thank god:) congo rajjy
zee10 IF-Rockerz
zee10
zee10

Joined: 17 November 2010
Posts: 7606

Posted: 13 March 2012 at 11:35am | IP Logged
WOW.. I just wanted this..
Very happy for her..
thakneek Newbie
thakneek
thakneek

Joined: 13 March 2012
Posts: 1

Posted: 13 March 2012 at 9:42pm | IP Logged
 Rajrani was awesome. She won so many immunity challenges. She definitely deserved to be in top 3
 
However, JD was the best. His scheming and plotting was excellent. He outwitted, outlasted and outplayed. He won immunity when it mattered. In this game you have to backstab, vote people out and in the end convince them to give you the final reward. There is nothing wrong with having multiple alliances and turn on people necessary in this game. Remember it is a game.
in the end if JD had not voted for Shivam, Rajrani would have been out.
He may have voted for Shivam, because he knew Sith would loose against Rajrani.
 Sith sure sucked up to Abhinav at the end to get his vote. That was a smart move.
I think Sith would have won if it was him, JD and Shivam
 
Anyway, I thought the jury was very vindictive, because JD outschemed most of them (Rohit, Abhinav, Payal etc)
  What I did not understand was why did the producers let the jury show theitr emotions at tribal council. They laughed , made remarks, faces etc.  This made it very easy for the remaining contestants and us the viewers,to guess how the jury was going to vote. We all knew for sure that they aren't going to vote for JD. So there wasn't enough suspense. The jury should be like a jury in court of law, They are not supposed to display their emotions.
Maybe Survivior India has different rules than Survivor USA.
Also Payal had been twitting comments before the last two episodes. I thought the contestants are not allowed to discuss, until final show is over.
 
 
 
 

The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:

memad

Neetu_Unleashed IF-Sizzlerz

Joined: 22 September 2011
Posts: 10466

Posted: 15 March 2012 at 9:21am | IP Logged
THE ACCOUNT OF THE MEMBER WHO POSTED THIS MESSAGE HAS BEEN TEMPORARILY BANNED.

If you think this is an error please Contact us.
memad IF-Sizzlerz
memad
memad

Joined: 17 September 2010
Posts: 20964

Posted: 16 March 2012 at 11:28pm | IP Logged
Originally posted by thakneek

 Rajrani was awesome. She won so many immunity challenges. She definitely deserved to be in top 3
 
However, JD was the best. His scheming and plotting was excellent. He outwitted, outlasted and outplayed. He won immunity when it mattered. In this game you have to backstab, vote people out and in the end convince them to give you the final reward. There is nothing wrong with having multiple alliances and turn on people necessary in this game. Remember it is a game.
in the end if JD had not voted for Shivam, Rajrani would have been out.
He may have voted for Shivam, because he knew Sith would loose against Rajrani.
 Sith sure sucked up to Abhinav at the end to get his vote. That was a smart move.
I think Sith would have won if it was him, JD and Shivam
 
Anyway, I thought the jury was very vindictive, because JD outschemed most of them (Rohit, Abhinav, Payal etc)
  What I did not understand was why did the producers let the jury show theitr emotions at tribal council. They laughed , made remarks, faces etc.  This made it very easy for the remaining contestants and us the viewers,to guess how the jury was going to vote. We all knew for sure that they aren't going to vote for JD. So there wasn't enough suspense. The jury should be like a jury in court of law, They are not supposed to display their emotions.
Maybe Survivior India has different rules than Survivor USA.
Also Payal had been twitting comments before the last two episodes. I thought the contestants are not allowed to discuss, until final show is over.
 
 
 
 
 
yes agree with u.the jury should hv been impartial at least in the tribal council.they shouldn't be allowed to flow their emotions like that.i didn't like the way they were making fun of jd.be a trecherous plotting,sceaming,back stabbing and also winning 2 immunities surprisingly..one has to credit jd for being in finals.

Go to top

Forum Quick Jump

Forum Category / Channels
Forums

Survivor India-The Ultimate Battle Topic Index

  • Please login to check your Last 10 Topics posted

Check these Celebrity also

Disclaimer: All Logos and Pictures of various Channels, Shows, Artistes, Media Houses, Companies, Brands etc. belong to their respective owners, and are used to merely visually identify the Channels, Shows, Companies, Brands, etc. to the viewer. Incase of any issue please contact the webmaster.

Popular Channels :
Star Plus | Zee TV | Sony TV | Colors TV | SAB TV | Life OK

Quick Links :
Top 100 TV Celebrities | Top 100 Bollywood Celebs | About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | Forum Index