The Winner Of Survivor India Is...(SPOILER) (Page 3)

kameshreddy

Senior Member

Joined: 04 November 2011

Posts: 700

Posted: 11 March 2012 at 11:00pm | IP Logged

Full Details click here

I am love to see final

The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:

disha_Maan.GC,

disha_Maan.GC

IF-Rockerz

Joined: 22 June 2011

Posts: 7946

Posted: 12 March 2012 at 4:40am | IP Logged

congrates rajrani... u truly deserves to be number one... Clap

but i wanted abhinav to be the best... he is sooo cool headed n skillfull player.. nyway, best of luck abhi... keep rocking... Thumbs Up

The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:

VarshaLuvsArjun,

Rafid.

IF-Addictz

Joined: 11 October 2011

Posts: 76000

Posted: 12 March 2012 at 5:36am | IP Logged

TFS

raspberrytorte

IF-Rockerz

Joined: 11 February 2011

Posts: 6059

Posted: 12 March 2012 at 11:48am | IP Logged

thank god:) congo rajjy

zee10

IF-Rockerz

Joined: 17 November 2010

Posts: 7606

Posted: 13 March 2012 at 11:35am | IP Logged

WOW.. I just wanted this..
Very happy for her..

thakneek

Newbie

Joined: 13 March 2012

Posts: 1

Posted: 13 March 2012 at 9:42pm | IP Logged

Rajrani was awesome. She won so many immunity challenges. She definitely deserved to be in top 3

However, JD was the best. His scheming and plotting was excellent. He outwitted, outlasted and outplayed. He won immunity when it mattered. In this game you have to backstab, vote people out and in the end convince them to give you the final reward. There is nothing wrong with having multiple alliances and turn on people necessary in this game. Remember it is a game.

in the end if JD had not voted for Shivam, Rajrani would have been out.

He may have voted for Shivam, because he knew Sith would loose against Rajrani.

Sith sure sucked up to Abhinav at the end to get his vote. That was a smart move.

I think Sith would have won if it was him, JD and Shivam

Anyway, I thought the jury was very vindictive, because JD outschemed most of them (Rohit, Abhinav, Payal etc)

What I did not understand was why did the producers let the jury show theitr emotions at tribal council. They laughed , made remarks, faces etc. This made it very easy for the remaining contestants and us the viewers,to guess how the jury was going to vote. We all knew for sure that they aren't going to vote for JD. So there wasn't enough suspense. The jury should be like a jury in court of law, They are not supposed to display their emotions.

Maybe Survivior India has different rules than Survivor USA.

Also Payal had been twitting comments before the last two episodes. I thought the contestants are not allowed to discuss, until final show is over.

The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:

memad,

Neetu_Unleashed

IF-Rockerz

Joined: 22 September 2011

Posts: 9571

Posted: 15 March 2012 at 9:21am | IP Logged

wow, this show is still on ?? nyways good to see rajrani, she is a deserving one...

memad

IF-Sizzlerz

Joined: 17 September 2010

Posts: 16855

Posted: 16 March 2012 at 11:28pm | IP Logged

Originally posted by thakneek

Rajrani was awesome. She won so many immunity challenges. She definitely deserved to be in top 3

However, JD was the best. His scheming and plotting was excellent. He outwitted, outlasted and outplayed. He won immunity when it mattered. In this game you have to backstab, vote people out and in the end convince them to give you the final reward. There is nothing wrong with having multiple alliances and turn on people necessary in this game. Remember it is a game.

in the end if JD had not voted for Shivam, Rajrani would have been out.

He may have voted for Shivam, because he knew Sith would loose against Rajrani.

Sith sure sucked up to Abhinav at the end to get his vote. That was a smart move.

I think Sith would have won if it was him, JD and Shivam

Anyway, I thought the jury was very vindictive, because JD outschemed most of them (Rohit, Abhinav, Payal etc)

What I did not understand was why did the producers let the jury show theitr emotions at tribal council. They laughed , made remarks, faces etc. This made it very easy for the remaining contestants and us the viewers,to guess how the jury was going to vote. We all knew for sure that they aren't going to vote for JD. So there wasn't enough suspense. The jury should be like a jury in court of law, They are not supposed to display their emotions.

Maybe Survivior India has different rules than Survivor USA.

Also Payal had been twitting comments before the last two episodes. I thought the contestants are not allowed to discuss, until final show is over.

yes agree with u.the jury should hv been impartial at least in the tribal council.they shouldn't be allowed to flow their emotions like that.i didn't like the way they were making fun of jd.be a trecherous plotting,sceaming,back stabbing and also winning 2 immunities surprisingly..one has to credit jd for being in finals.

Page 3 of 4

Posted: 11 March 2012 at 11:00pm | IP Logged

Posted: 12 March 2012 at 4:40am | IP Logged

Posted: 12 March 2012 at 5:36am | IP Logged

Posted: 12 March 2012 at 11:48am | IP Logged

Posted: 13 March 2012 at 11:35am | IP Logged

Posted: 13 March 2012 at 9:42pm | IP Logged

Posted: 15 March 2012 at 9:21am | IP Logged

Posted: 16 March 2012 at 11:28pm | IP Logged

Forum Quick Jump

Forum Search

Check these Celebrity also

Join India-forums Today!

Here's why members would love to be a part of India-Forums.com:

Join Us Close