Originally posted by estee
right or wrong, i guess we will have to find out. but here is where i think mohan is at fault:
he did not question evidence given to him by the construction owner. he did not appear to be concerned that the owner is in the best possible position to fake the evidence.
he was in a hurry to get the story out before the committee report. why not wait to hear what the 2-year work was going to say, and then present his story if the report was counter to what the evidence said. mohan is hungry for fame and recognition. a little too much to be completely faithful only to the truth.
ah well, i guess he is going to do some growing up soon.
Mohan is not hungry for fame. He did it just out of sense of duty. Nothing else. From what his mom told, he has gone against his own father for taking the path of truth. Such a person cannot do something just for fame. The fame he got is just additional thing.
He verified the evidences he got. He verified the material that was used in the construction. Its very obvious that he must have verified Amar's signatures. Maybe dinanath duped Amar into signing it. But there is no way mohan can know it now.
I don't know why everyone says if dinanath is proved guilty, Amar will be judged innocent. Mohan has to get evidence that Amar was framed, only then Amar can be declared innocent.