Joined: 31 March 2005
Hey guys , this is a basic theorem of Kasautii…as the whole show is based on assumptions.
Don't take it lightly, serious calculations are involved ,this is the 'ASSUMPTION THEOREM'.
1) If you are watching an Ekta soap ,one scene you make an assumption and in the next you are proved wrong.
2) Script writer has nothing to do with maths , festivals etc,they could be twisted according to the situation .Even some events in the past may appear now, as if they never happened .
3) Never trust the leaps , they could increase and decrease at any moment as per the producer's rethoughts.
Initial assumptions 1 :
Prerna and Anurag of same age…taking the least possible age to fall in love and have a baby,get married : 21 yrs.
Mr.Bajaj –eldest daughter finished studies,working ,romancing …so she is assumed 20 when prerna is 21yrs…so least possible age for bajaj is 41yrs (assuming his 1st marriage was at 20 yrs )
Mohini,prena's mom :early 40s.
Calculations and statements :
3 yrs old prem died ,then sneha was born = 3+1=4 yrs.
8 yrs LEAP: sneha's 9 th birthday celebrated with Aparna's birthday =4+9=13yrs
(Ignore:Prerna said to Bajaj "12 yrs ka aapka saath",when he asked her to save Sneha)
Prerna is pregnant.
Anurag's death was on "karva chauth'..the month is
Now according to actual calculations :
Mr.Bajaj = 41+13 =54yrs.
Anurag & Prerna = 21+13=34yrs
Sneha = 9 yrs
BUT:Under (dead) Anurag's photo it was written :1974-2004
So Anurag= 30 yrs.
So initial assumptions 1 are proved wrong.
Mr.Bajaj =50 yrs
But for Sneha, ekta had no change I guess.
Mr.Bajaj's birthday shock…anurag is alive.
BUT: Anurag returns on Ganesh Chathurthi ie.month is
september ,but pregnant prerna is still pregnant….
So assumption 2 is proved wrong.
Prerna gives birth to prem. Mr.Bajaj had a one night stand with Madvi.At least 1 or 2 months for bajaj-prerna reunion.(prerna in jail and all)
(Ignore : prerna said "15 yrs laghe mujhe aapki family banane mein", script writers calculation)
Bajaj-Prerna engagement Then 3 or 4 months passes away in the calender.
Madvi is not yet pregnant.
After marriage Bajaj's next birthday =13 +1 =14 yrs.
Prerna's 4rth pregnancy…till godh barayi .
From actual calculations ,the total no: of years passed is 14 yrs.ok lets take 15.
Anurag & Prerna = 30-31yrs
We saw a 47 yrs old Tushar Bajaj (as per ekta's calculation)
BUT:Tanisha is Bajaj's daughter.
So assumption 4 is proved wrong.
In Malaysia Prerna said "18 yrs of marriage"ie.ekta reduced the leap.
OK 18 yrs LEAP:
From actual calculations ,the total no: of years passed is 32yrs.
Now Mr.Bajaj says Kuki is unmarried…according to ekta's maths Kuki is 34yrs old..and according to the actual calculation she is 39 yrs old.
Now they say Anurag is 45 yrs old.
Sneha was 8yrs old when bajaj&prerna got married.(so that 9th B'bay celebration was fake??)
Mr.bajaj says"meine tumhara 8yrs intezaar kiya prerna"(so did they got married soon after the leap ,and his two B'day celebrations after the leap were fake ??)
So assumptions 7,6,5,3 are proved wrong.
According to ekta maths :
(Prerna grew old,but he is still the same ; still a father of young daughter ,as other kids are missing. Does he look that old from any angle ?? Neyyyyy!!!! He is dashing ,handsome ,more active –remember the run chasing komolika -and they form a perfect couple )
He never grow old ,when he should be in 40s he is told to be 30,when he should be in 50s he is told to be in 40s. Does he look that old from any angle ??His second child Sneha is 26 ,but he is 45.FAST WORLD !!!!
She plays childish than her sis Kasak 8 yrs younger than her.
These assumptions are valid ,if all of them had their first marriages at 20 and had a baby in 21.
Nivedita Basu –may be settled abroad and so busy that she didn't come neither for Moloy's death nor for Aonu's death.
Vishakha-may be married ,had some kids and settled abroad.
Kuki-may be doing higher studies, abroad.
Tushar-may be handling Dad's business ,bussy traveling and may be married.
Birju Kaka-may be "Baghvan ko pyare ho gaye".
Thus the theorem is proved…never make assumptions in Ekta soaps.
Converse is also true:
if your assumptions are proved wrong and you are totally confused ,then its sure you are watching an Ekta soap.
For the readers who are interested to know the actual ages:
Anurag : 53yrs
Komolika : 53yrs
Sneha : 28 yrs.
got totally confused guys..need some tution..here it is.......Bajjuuuuuuu.....!!!
If you have some maths left ,then try the proof of this theorem on kyunki..
"jo kuch bacha hai , who bhi nikal jayega"
Sorry if there had been any mistake in the assumptions…I'm too confused.
Share your assumptions, if any!!!!
Joined: 22 March 2005
Joined: 23 October 2004
Joined: 28 March 2005
Joined: 31 March 2005
Hey thx for the response guys...it was too confusing...but managed,as i never forget anything related to ronit...always have a close watch on him.
ya vaashi i've mentioned abt wednesdays episode...but you are mistaken it's 45 not 43....
anyway thx 4 appreciating.ronit rocks in kzk.
Joined: 31 March 2005
Today ie.on monday...in kzk, it was not the photo that Sravan took of kasak...given in the news paper....So assumption:
may be the correspondent had some better photos of the industrialists daughter....i meant kasak.
see still i'm doing the same mistake of assuming.
Joined: 23 October 2004
Joined: 10 November 2004
Man u spent a lotta time on this!!! Keep up the good work!!
Oh and i'd like to make another assumption :Either Tanisha knows where komolika lives or komolika is a very generous person (like Bajaj...remember 300 crore for sneha's kidnappin!!!) and just gives 5000 bucks to free any kid from jail!!!???
And another assumption...Obviously Shravan's pants have no pockets....so he has to hand over his cell and wallet to komolika before walking off with the policeman??!!
(i dont come online for one day and i have to go 3 pgs back to see all the posts and replies!! Sheesh!!! are we active users of this forum or wat!)
20th nov updt ANU 2 FIND PROOF AGST BAJAJ
Author: junooni09 Replies: 20 Views: 3990
|junooni09||20||3990||21 November 2007 at 2:22am by prerna4rishav|
person dat claims naman lying proof here
Author: ..-Zaara-.. Replies: 7 Views: 910
|..-Zaara-..||7||910||12 November 2007 at 4:15am by .Prometheus.|
kzk is ending--proof
Author: zaara_kzk Replies: 1 Views: 525
|zaara_kzk||1||525||08 October 2007 at 10:02am by psawyer|
Komolika..still da *Devil*....with Proof!
Author: SujalkiDeewani Replies: 8 Views: 842
|SujalkiDeewani||8||842||22 September 2007 at 7:03am by sallu_lover|
did they have proof against prerna?
Author: -Masakali- Replies: 5 Views: 325
|-Masakali-||5||325||10 August 2006 at 7:55am by ^PoocHi^|
Some powerful views mentioned and talked about here.
Karanvir is certainly facing a dilemma of sorts...
Popular Channels :
Quick Links :