Pavitra Rishta

India-Forums

   
Pavitra Rishta
Pavitra Rishta

archana is way worse than manjusha !! (Page 3)

devashree_h Moderator
devashree_h
devashree_h

Joined: 23 December 2005
Posts: 15068

Posted: 21 December 2011 at 9:10am | IP Logged
Originally posted by prasad1991

 

 
sulman had first SON ...  a WAARIS ... who told them to give birth to 3 more children when they were financially not fit for raising them ??????


First of all Prasad, as has been pointed out the use of word SON,Waaris..that is what gives your post a totally different meaning. You did not say they had one child that should have been enough. You specifically mentioned SON in that post. And Sulman are from another era where mostly people had multiple kids.

And another thing, I would request you tone down your critique of Archana. i am not stopping you from criticizing Archana but things can be put in better ways so that they do not offend other members.

The following 4 member(s) liked the above post:

Kittya_CullensuanSunoNa...Tanyaz

koolsadhu1000 IF-Sizzlerz
koolsadhu1000
koolsadhu1000

Joined: 03 July 2007
Posts: 20976

Posted: 21 December 2011 at 9:11am | IP Logged
For just a fictional show we should not be promoting this whole idea of looking up to a baby just because it is a boy and Waaris and all that  ..In m yopinion it is extremely  wrong and I will say again that today I am feeling very bad that I had to read something like this in this forum ...
 

I know the feeling . I had felt extremely bad when the idea that a young girl who finds herself accidentally pregnant { Shravani} was automatically considered to be loose in character and comments were rampant on how she must have been sleeping around and like buttons were clicked . That too was in this forum. Probably objections were not raised then as Archana was an all time favorite . I had found those ideas an insult to woman in general . If a woman chooses to have consential sex and decides to bring forth a life in the world it need not be that she is a woman with loose morals . I think prasad  worded it wrongly  in sequence...he should indeed remove it coz I do not want this comparatively harmless post to be closed down for misunderstandings . 

Btw I am talking in general as a member .Not about you , so do not misunderstand .

The following 3 member(s) liked the above post:

bhallaroxKittya_CullenDabulls23

SportsFreak Goldie
SportsFreak
SportsFreak

Joined: 19 January 2011
Posts: 1280

Posted: 21 December 2011 at 9:11am | IP Logged
Originally posted by prasad1991

Originally posted by dhoomdhadaka

Sorry did not wanted to butt in but prasad I found it objectionable too that u stated waaris and all stuff come off it u mean ppl should have second child only if first one is a daughter ah? How insane is that well I think we have come of those times now atleast and manav was not right in buying nor was he right in trusting Savita so why not hold him equally responsible for the mess
well to be honest i meant that only ...  & nowhere it is wrong
 
in today's world where v r suffering from so much over pollution , population explosion , lack of jobs , single child is something which is required most !!
 
by more kids u r somewhere doing injustice with previous ones ... bcoz all the things of first child will get divided ... & if something happens to u then ?? ... then whole burden of sibling will come on elder child only na

oh my God, by this definition my mom should never had me since our first born was a boy and am the second born...Thank God my parents don't have such a mentality..
This is really being regressive that we should only work to have one son i can't believe there is this mentality in the 21st century

The following 3 member(s) liked the above post:

suanSunoNa...Tanyaz

devashree_h Moderator
devashree_h
devashree_h

Joined: 23 December 2005
Posts: 15068

Posted: 21 December 2011 at 9:12am | IP Logged
Originally posted by prasad1991

Originally posted by dhoomdhadaka

Sorry did not wanted to butt in but prasad I found it objectionable too that u stated waaris and all stuff come off it u mean ppl should have second child only if first one is a daughter ah? How insane is that well I think we have come of those times now atleast and manav was not right in buying nor was he right in trusting Savita so why not hold him equally responsible for the mess
well to be honest i meant that only ...  & nowhere it is wrong
 
in today's world where v r suffering from so much over pollution , population explosion , lack of jobs , single child is something which is required most !!
 
by more kids u r somewhere doing injustice with previous ones ... bcoz all the things of first child will get divided ... & if something happens to u then ?? ... then whole burden of sibling will come on elder child only na

So, you absolutely dont mind population exploding if people have daughters and keep trying for a Son and then have God knows how many kids? is that what you are trying to say?

The following 3 member(s) liked the above post:

suanSunoNa...Tanyaz

ChannaMereya IF-Stunnerz
ChannaMereya
ChannaMereya

Joined: 06 November 2010
Posts: 43925

Posted: 21 December 2011 at 9:12am | IP Logged
Oh so u mean girls are a burden and guys are someone great why look if u would have told to have only one child it was fine but over population and all increase only bec of girl is it snap it out I read somewhere u and Hey all this donot suite u are degrading girls so better be careful if one child is funda then girl or boy it should be one only and u too me represent male ego sorry
prasad1991 Goldie

Joined: 16 November 2010
Posts: 943

Posted: 21 December 2011 at 9:13am | IP Logged
THE ACCOUNT OF THE MEMBER WHO POSTED THIS MESSAGE HAS BEEN TEMPORARILY BANNED.

If you think this is an error please Contact us.

The following 3 member(s) liked the above post:

Cupcake4GHTbhallaroxDabulls23

ChannaMereya IF-Stunnerz
ChannaMereya
ChannaMereya

Joined: 06 November 2010
Posts: 43925

Posted: 21 December 2011 at 9:14am | IP Logged
Oh so u mean girls are a burden and guys are someone great why look if u would have told to have only one child it was fine but over population and all increase only bec of girl is it snap it out and Hey all this donot suite u are degrading girls so better be careful if one child is funda then girl or boy it should be one only
prasad1991 Goldie

Joined: 16 November 2010
Posts: 943

Posted: 21 December 2011 at 9:17am | IP Logged
THE ACCOUNT OF THE MEMBER WHO POSTED THIS MESSAGE HAS BEEN TEMPORARILY BANNED.

If you think this is an error please Contact us.

Go to top

Related Topics

  Topics Author Replies Views Last Post
Idiot Archana or Emotional Archana

Author: LoveTVShows   Replies: 9   Views: 2959

LoveTVShows 9 2959 04 December 2011 at 3:53am by krnagu
Bored of this Manjusha

Author: krnagu   Replies: 9   Views: 1008

krnagu 9 1008 20 July 2011 at 7:37am by swtbaby
manjusha

Author: hk111990   Replies: 6   Views: 1219

hk111990 6 1219 24 May 2011 at 11:07pm by Dabulls23
Vinod & Manjusha

Author: sme123   Replies: 8   Views: 1307

sme123 8 1307 09 January 2011 at 6:54pm by desicrowd

Forum Quick Jump

Forum Category / Channels
Forums

Pavitra Rishta Topic Index

  • Please login to check your Last 10 Topics posted

Check these Celebrity also

Disclaimer: All Logos and Pictures of various Channels, Shows, Artistes, Media Houses, Companies, Brands etc. belong to their respective owners, and are used to merely visually identify the Channels, Shows, Companies, Brands, etc. to the viewer. Incase of any issue please contact the webmaster.

Popular Channels :
Star Plus | Zee TV | Sony TV | Colors TV | SAB TV | Life OK

Quick Links :
Top 100 TV Celebrities | Top 100 Bollywood Celebs | About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | Forum Index