archana is way worse than manjusha !! - Page 4

Prasad, you can have consortium of lawyers to defend you but you can't change the words you have written. 

It is not being anti archana or not? I just hate the concept that if you have a son as your first born then don't try for a girl child because your lineage will continue but if you have a daughter as a first born then try for another child so as to get a son??? I think this is being really regressive... I would have not had any problem if the topic starter had said that people should stick to have one child be it a boy or a girl but i do have a problem when the TM says that one should have one child if their first born is a   boy and then try for another child if their first born is a daughter

Bonne exactly my feeling he just triggered a wrong side he definately was derogating all of us and male chauvinism I wanted to tell that too and sorry prasad if ppl still have thinking like u idoubt our country will ever progress and saksham controversies were not started from nowhere read the post first it is disrespectful to girls and Dont appreciate his attitude at
All criticize a character as much u want but dont bring it to this level

saksham_rocks, I think you have been informed earlier using MIDS is not allowed. I dont want to reveal your original ID, but please do not use your MID to post here.

Sulman always have been selfish parents..Karanjkar family in general line starts with Archana... Edited by Dabulls23 - 12 years ago

Well saksham I dont know but as per I have read bonne post she is a manav fan and yeah he telling tat parent should have second child only if first is daughter is wat was male chauvinist

devashree ...irrespective of what  prasad meant etc ...I think this post has become now very controversial ...so please shut it down .