Pavitra Rishta

   

archana is way worse than manjusha !!

Post Reply New Post

Page 1 of 5

Page 1
Page   of 5
Page 2 Page 5

prasad1991

Goldie

Joined: 16 November 2010

Posts: 1042

Posted: 21 December 2011 at 12:13am | IP Logged
THE ACCOUNT OF THE MEMBER WHO POSTED THIS MESSAGE HAS BEEN TEMPORARILY BANNED.

If you think this is an error please Contact us.

The following 7 member(s) liked the above post:

Gauri22Cupcake4GHTriniiiics-07bhallaroxkoolsadhu1000Dabulls23

Dear Guest, Being an unregistered member you are missing out on participating in the lively discussions happening on the topic "archana is way worse than manjusha !!" in Pavitra Rishta forum. In addition you lose out on the fun interactions with fellow members and other member exclusive features that India-Forums has to offer. Join India's most popular discussion portal on Indian Entertainment. It's FREE and registration is effortless so JOIN NOW!

shalgo

Senior Member

shalgo

Joined: 02 January 2007

Posts: 389

Posted: 21 December 2011 at 1:13am | IP Logged
Originally posted by prasad1991

inspite of vinod not having done anything great for rasika ... still manju used to strive for his promotions & jobs in all the possible ways ... she can go upto any levels for the sake of husband & daughters future

& this archanaCensored ... she was actually jealous of manav's success ... how sarcasticaslly she said " tycoon manav deshmukh " ... no happiness for his success at all ... when she & her mother have comfortably stretched themselves in his house of 70 lakhs which after 18 yrs must have become 7 crores
 
i was happy when majusha showed archana her true level by pointing at her rishtas
 
I don't understand what great ahsaan it is, if a husband bought a house for his wife's mother...wouldn't he had to pay for alimony in case of divorce. Archana has done innumerable sacrifices for Manav and his family and only a girl like her could have survived and managed to keep peace at home with a mil like Savita ( who i remember even took away the jewelery archana got from her mother). she is actually paying the price of not telling all Savita's deeds & manipulation to Manav and always forgiving her. Archana is paying for her achhai
 
Really sad that member of the  forum always talk about Manav's ahsaan (even Manav's doesn' see it as ahsaan) on Archana...why is that if a son-in-law does anythin good for his wife's parents...it is a ahsaan and if a daughter-in-law does something for his parents it is her duty and not even acknowledged.,...Really sad to see this...

The following 12 member(s) liked the above post:

lipsa123AnijoyceJotz_92SportsFreakGauri22-mina-Shas3PriyyankaKittya_CullensuanJess.-sylph-

prasad1991

Goldie

Joined: 16 November 2010

Posts: 1042

Posted: 21 December 2011 at 2:34am | IP Logged
THE ACCOUNT OF THE MEMBER WHO POSTED THIS MESSAGE HAS BEEN TEMPORARILY BANNED.

If you think this is an error please Contact us.

The following 3 member(s) liked the above post:

chandtinCupcake4GHTbhallarox

shalgo

Senior Member

shalgo

Joined: 02 January 2007

Posts: 389

Posted: 21 December 2011 at 2:42am | IP Logged
Originally posted by prasad1991

Originally posted by shalgo

Originally posted by prasad1991

inspite of vinod not having done anything great for rasika ... still manju used to strive for his promotions & jobs in all the possible ways ... she can go upto any levels for the sake of husband & daughters future

& this archanaCensored ... she was actually jealous of manav's success ... how sarcasticaslly she said " tycoon manav deshmukh " ... no happiness for his success at all ... when she & her mother have comfortably stretched themselves in his house of 70 lakhs which after 18 yrs must have become 7 crores
 
i was happy when majusha showed archana her true level by pointing at her rishtas
 
I don't understand what great ahsaan it is, if a husband bought a house for his wife's mother...wouldn't he had to pay for alimony in case of divorce. Archana has done innumerable sacrifices for Manav and his family and only a girl like her could have survived and managed to keep peace at home with a mil like Savita ( who i remember even took away the jewelery archana got from her mother). she is actually paying the price of not telling all Savita's deeds & manipulation to Manav and always forgiving her. Archana is paying for her achhai
 
Really sad that member of the  forum always talk about Manav's ahsaan (even Manav's doesn' see it as ahsaan) on Archana...why is that if a son-in-law does anythin good for his wife's parents...it is a ahsaan and if a daughter-in-law does something for his parents it is her duty and not even acknowledged.,...Really sad to see this...
OuchOuchOuchOuchOuch
 
well tell me what has archana really done for the D's ... manju-rassi got D's beaten up ... becoz of them sachin died
 
archana had no shame about her sasuraal's insults ... neither her devar's death who used to run behind her saying archana vahini archana vahini ... & what did hopeless archana vahini do for her devar ... she did chamchegiri of her crass & evil vahini instead of teaching her a lesson ... messed up shravani's life by all her double games ... & didnt even look properly after sacchu ... when a woman like her didnt care for her own daughters & gave them up easily ... y will she care for her bhatija who is not even of her blood
 
archana only did bhalaai of her bhanja aniket by destroying varun madhuri's life
 
listen if u call it chamchagiri...she has done the most chmchagiri to the snake in arm Savita...who is hell bound to make her own son'e life miserable...archana is like that... she is even good to people who take advantge of her. She was the one who rescued Savita when was humiliated by Rasika in a party...this is her chamchagiri.
Archana has nothing to do with her devar's death...she was a victm of scheming. she was distraught when her deavr died...plus she was very caring for sachu...acutally risked her life to save him...which even shravani saw. and plus don't make shravani mahaan...she has transformed because of archana's goodness...
 
I still believe that she is a victim of her goodness and there is nothing wrong in helping her family as a daughter...i son't think there is anything wrong in that.

The following 7 member(s) liked the above post:

AnijoyceSportsFreakPriyyankaKittya_CullenShas3suan-sylph-

koolsadhu1000

IF-Sizzlerz

koolsadhu1000

Joined: 03 July 2007

Posts: 21009

Posted: 21 December 2011 at 4:44am | IP Logged
I still believe that she is a victim of her goodness and there is nothing wrong in helping her family as a daughter...i son't think there is anything wrong in that.

Just in a span of 5 years if you flick 70 lakhs off ur husband there is something very very wrong . I am not counting the other loans Manav took , nor am I counting the presents he gave to Sulo ,  or the Kharcha he did of Sulo by keeping her in his house

Archana was not doing job . She used HIS money ...which was actually legally for HER and for HIS kids .

You said about ALIMONY . After just a 5 yr marraige , no middle class wife gets THIS huge an amount ...even to fight for the half [ which she can get isf proven] she has to go thru a decade of struggle ...that bad the divorce courts r in India . In this case since Manav had the children , Archana wud NOT get such a massive amount . The money is divided by also calculating child support expenses . In India getting child support is a headache . First and foremost the divorce process is not speedy ...it stretches and stretches for years if parties r not in mutual agreement . Even if they r in mutual agreement , many factors need to be proven . People literally DROP and WAIVE aside fnancial support part simply to get a speedy divorce and be free ...I am not exaggerating .

So in a real world Saint Archana wud have probably landed with NOTHING. Or sumthing very minimal if it wud be proved in court that She endangered Soham by insisting he remain with Varsha .

Theres nothing wrong if damad does everything for mother in law . But at the rate Karanjkar ate Manavs money like termites , there indeed is something VERY wrong .

About her chamchagiri I agree . She does chamchagiri of everyone and anyone who is part of her goal . Manju's chamchagiri she did to save her brother's marraige , the Deshmukhs will deal with the loss of their dead son , my bro's sansar must be saved was Archana's thought . If Vinod had died like Sachin she wud have done case on Rasika by pointing fingers and throwing histrionic fits ...as MUMMY Sulochana wud have WEPT . Archana gives only HER tears value .

Savitas brief chamchagiri in 3 month stay was done coz she did not wanna be thrown out of DEshmukh House . At that time her goal was staying put there . She wanted to stay there and regain emotional control over Manav . 

I find her chamchagiri very goal oriented . She had done chamchagiri of Madhuri to extract her testimony in court and legalize her own sister's marraige .


The following 3 member(s) liked the above post:

Cupcake4GHTbhallaroxDabulls23

prasad1991

Goldie

Joined: 16 November 2010

Posts: 1042

Posted: 21 December 2011 at 7:53am | IP Logged
THE ACCOUNT OF THE MEMBER WHO POSTED THIS MESSAGE HAS BEEN TEMPORARILY BANNED.

If you think this is an error please Contact us.

The following 3 member(s) liked the above post:

bhallaroxkoolsadhu1000Dabulls23

Tanyaz

Coolbie

Tanyaz

Joined: 03 December 2009

Posts: 35539

Posted: 21 December 2011 at 8:21am | IP Logged
Originally posted by prasad1991

[QUOTE=shalgo][QUOTE=prasad1991]
 
sulman had first SON ...  a WAARIS ... who told them to give birth to 3 more children when they were financially not fit for raising them ??????
 
Hang on a minute , what kind of a statement is this ..Just because your first son is a boy , you should not go for other children ...
 
I don't believe I am reading this i nthis forum , I don't know what to think or say any more  ...
 
And by the way , by those standards , even savita 's first son was a boy  and she was much worse financially ..how come she is being spared here ...
 
This is just unbelievable  stuff . It is very sad  to be reading something  like this in this forum ..
For just a fictional show we should not be promoting this whole idea of looking up to a baby just because it is a boy and Waaris and all that  ..In m yopinion it is extremely  wrong and I will say again that today I am feeling very bad that I had to read something like this in this forum ...
 


Edited by Tanyaz - 21 December 2011 at 8:33am

The following 7 member(s) liked the above post:

AnijoyceSportsFreakarunahcKittya_CullenWhite-Rosesuan-sylph-

prasad1991

Goldie

Joined: 16 November 2010

Posts: 1042

Posted: 21 December 2011 at 8:32am | IP Logged
THE ACCOUNT OF THE MEMBER WHO POSTED THIS MESSAGE HAS BEEN TEMPORARILY BANNED.

If you think this is an error please Contact us.

The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:

Luv4games

Post Reply New Post

Go to top

Related Topics

  Topics Topic Starter Replies Views Last Post
Idiot Archana or Emotional Archana LoveTVShows 9 1736 04 December 2011 at 3:53am
By krnagu
Bored of this Manjusha krnagu 9 504 20 July 2011 at 7:37am
By swtbaby
manjusha hk111990 6 709 24 May 2011 at 11:07pm
By Dabulls23
manjusha is the most responsible lady in PR

2 3

ayesha_angel 16 1851 08 May 2011 at 11:10am
By prasad1991
Vinod & Manjusha sme123 8 756 09 January 2011 at 6:54pm
By desicrowd

Forum Quick Jump

Forum Category

Active Forums

Limit search to this Forum only.

 

 

Disclaimer: All Logos and Pictures of various Channels, Shows, Artistes, Media Houses, Companies, Brands etc. belong to their respective owners, and are used to merely visually identify the Channels, Shows, Companies, Brands, etc. to the viewer. Incase of any issue please contact the webmaster.