He's running scared and she's chasing unwillingly
Whether the marriage was arranged or love, a compromise or a not, does she have the right to know? If tables were turned - would he?
A past is a dangerous thing - it clings like a dusty shadow.
Generally speaking, it's a toss-up
disclosure might be futile as bygones are best left by bygones
then on the other hand, if done in a sensitive manner and at the right time (that's the difficult part) to a mature and reasonable partner it might actually add to the "trust" factor in a relationship
In this case it might not be so general. Ram said to Apeksha - yes my parivar is here. does that mean he has a child from a previous affair that was discontinued with this girl. The dude is over the hill - expecting that a rich and charged male is hanging around as Mr. Abstinence for the past few decades is a little difficult to be believe. If this is so then the general toss up argument does not apply me thinks as disclosure of an existing and unbreakable link to the past is a must and no matter what the state of affairs in Denmark wifey has a right to know.
What do ya think folks?
comment:
p_commentcount