Devon ke Dev Mahadev

   

\|/Doubts & Discussions about Lord Shiva Part-1\|/ (Page 148)

Post Reply New Post

Page 148 of 149

MrToolConfuser

IF-Sizzlerz

MrToolConfuser

Joined: 14 November 2012

Posts: 14817

Posted: 08 April 2013 at 10:35pm | IP Logged
@Rheva Heres it.
Originally posted by mnx12


Sati was shown time travelling in future to test Ram, as they both existed in different Yugas. Was shown suffering for that deed in present by the makers., where as Ram is yet to take birth in the show.Some stories in Puranas are added later on , which doesn't have logical connection with the main story, but is accepted by some because it is written in Puranas. This is one such story. Some even say this Sati was from another Kalpa, but why did this Kalpa's Sati has to suffer for other Kalpa's Sati. Some questions doen't have logical explanation to them, sati testing Ram is one such story.

Dear Guest, Being an unregistered member you are missing out on participating in the lively discussions happening on the topic "\|/Doubts & Discussions about Lord Shiva Part-1\|/ (Page 148)" in Devon ke Dev Mahadev forum. In addition you lose out on the fun interactions with fellow members and other member exclusive features that India-Forums has to offer. Join India's most popular discussion portal on Indian Entertainment. It's FREE and registration is effortless so JOIN NOW!

wildcat1994

Senior Member

wildcat1994

Joined: 12 April 2011

Posts: 367

Posted: 10 April 2013 at 4:20am | IP Logged
Originally posted by .Vrish.

Saraswati & Lakshmi are already in the show, and they are not  Shiva's daughters, except in Bong tradition, as is shown during Durga Puja.  Even Ambika is a form of Devi Parvati when she was approached by Shumbha.

Shiva's only 2 daughters, AFAIK, were Asokasundari and Manasa Devi.  Both of them are known only in some folklore, and are certainly not as universal as Kartikeya and Ganesh.

I'd be more interested in seeing Devasena back and marrying Kartikeya, rather than umpty marriages of Shiva & Parvati.
 In regions around kailash, RIVER  SARASWATI is believed to be SHIV-PARVATI's daughter, Ambika is d daughter of durga-shiv n i m unsure of lakshmi but this lakshmi n vishnu's wife r diff frm each-other...don't confuse urself btwn tem!!!

Meynika

Senior Member

Meynika

Joined: 22 November 2006

Posts: 218

Posted: 11 April 2013 at 7:13pm | IP Logged
A huge blooper I think...
 
In the current track Jalandhar is born in Parvati era (Sati in previous life).
 
But Prasuti (Sati's mother) already told the Tulsi and Jalandhar story in one of the early episodes (Jan or Feb 2012 somewhere).
 
Is this a mistake?

Surya_krsnbhakt

IF-Dazzler

Surya_krsnbhakt

Joined: 20 March 2013

Posts: 2713

Posted: 13 April 2013 at 12:04am | IP Logged
Originally posted by Meynika

A huge blooper I think...
 
In the current track Jalandhar is born in Parvati era (Sati in previous life).
 
But Prasuti (Sati's mother) already told the Tulsi and Jalandhar story in one of the early episodes (Jan or Feb 2012 somewhere).
 
Is this a mistake?
Yes, this is one of the BIG Bloopers of DKDM. Ignore it.

Surya_krsnbhakt

IF-Dazzler

Surya_krsnbhakt

Joined: 20 March 2013

Posts: 2713

Posted: 13 April 2013 at 12:12am | IP Logged
OKay, my doubt might sound irrelevant to the topic, but its connected.

We all know that our great Vyasa Bhagavan wrote different versions in different Puranas. He made different deities Supreme. Also, all Puranas were narated by Ugrasrava Sauti to Saunaka and others. So, when the write is same, and orator is same, and audience is same, HOW COME the audience didn't get confused abt the different versions. Like for example:

  • Sauti (while saying Shiva Purana): Jalandhar was the ansh of shiva's anger and he married vrinda. He lusted after Parvati but because of his wife's pativrata dharma, he couldn't be killed. So Vishnu took Jalandhar's form and lived with VRinda. So her dharm was destroyed and Jalandhar was killed.
Saunaka and others: OKay OKay.

  • Sauti (during Devi BHagavata): Shankhachooda was an incarnation of Shridama, the parisada of Sri KRishna and Radha, adn he married tulasi. because of his wife's pativrata dharma, he couldn't be killed. So Vishnu took Shankhachooda's form and lived with Tulasi. So her dharm was destroyed and Shankhachooda was killed.
So why didn't Saunaka say this: HEY! YOu have already told this SAME story! Your just replacing names. Its the same story. ARe you lying or what? Don't confuse us like this.. Blah blah

The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:

.Vrish.

wildcat1994

Senior Member

wildcat1994

Joined: 12 April 2011

Posts: 367

Posted: 13 April 2013 at 4:01am | IP Logged
Originally posted by Surya_krsnbhakt

OKay, my doubt might sound irrelevant to the topic, but its connected.

We all know that our great Vyasa Bhagavan wrote different versions in different Puranas. He made different deities Supreme. Also, all Puranas were narated by Ugrasrava Sauti to Saunaka and others. So, when the write is same, and orator is same, and audience is same, HOW COME the audience didn't get confused abt the different versions. Like for example:

  • Sauti (while saying Shiva Purana): Jalandhar was the ansh of shiva's anger and he married vrinda. He lusted after Parvati but because of his wife's pativrata dharma, he couldn't be killed. So Vishnu took Jalandhar's form and lived with VRinda. So her dharm was destroyed and Jalandhar was killed.
Saunaka and others: OKay OKay.

  • Sauti (during Devi BHagavata): Shankhachooda was an incarnation of Shridama, the parisada of Sri KRishna and Radha, adn he married tulasi. because of his wife's pativrata dharma, he couldn't be killed. So Vishnu took Shankhachooda's form and lived with Tulasi. So her dharm was destroyed and Shankhachooda was killed.
So why didn't Saunaka say this: HEY! YOu have already told this SAME story! Your just replacing names. Its the same story. ARe you lying or what? Don't confuse us like this.. Blah blah
well, yes the puranas were written, narrated by same people but the problem is that the original versions were mixed with subsequent versions written by diff people. during that time. The historians are still unsure if d puranas as we know them today were the ones that were written by VYASA Bhagwan or others have just put additions in the earlier versions. 

since, the text in d puranas of today has been edited by several others during the same period, differenciating the original from edited version is difficult...hope u understand tis!!!

The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:

Surya_krsnbhakt

varaali

IF-Dazzler

varaali

Joined: 17 July 2006

Posts: 2772

Posted: 14 April 2013 at 2:47am | IP Logged
Surya,

i have a question. Is Radha explicitly mentioned in the Devi Bhagavatam ? 

Surya_krsnbhakt

IF-Dazzler

Surya_krsnbhakt

Joined: 20 March 2013

Posts: 2713

Posted: 14 April 2013 at 2:59am | IP Logged
Originally posted by varaali

Surya,

i have a question. Is Radha explicitly mentioned in the Devi Bhagavatam ? 

Yes. In the Ninth Skandha, there is an entire chapter dedicated to her and her worship. And most stories in that Skandha are connected to Radha and Krishna.
For example, the story of Shankhachooda itself is a result of Radha's curse.
Radha is described as the HIghest Shakti of Krishna, the Supersoul of the Universe (I AM little biased here, so forgive me)
She is supposed to be the Greatest POwer of the Universe, and Lord Krishna's Kriya Shakti. Durga Devi is his Iccha Shakti and Maya Shakti. Sarasvati is his Gnana SHakti. Lakshmi is his... I don't know, maybe its BHoga and Yoga SHakti. Savitri also I'm not sure. Sorry abt that. You can check It on this link. http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/db/index.htm
Oh yeah, though i don't feel like saying this, Devi Bhagavati is the Mula Prakrti into which Lord Krsna is transformed at the end of each Kalpa.

Post Reply New Post

Go to top

Related Topics

  Topics Topic Starter Replies Views Last Post
Narmada- Shiva's daughter natv 4 1254 14 April 2013 at 6:17am
By natv
Siva Tattva - The Reality of Shiva ( simplified) Shakti_Shiva 2 979 22 March 2013 at 11:36am
By Shakti_Shiva
Shiva will be back to being anasakta? Shakti_Shiva 6 560 21 March 2013 at 4:20am
By Sandytatsme
Lord Bramha = Lord Vishnu = Mahadev

2

Kanu007 11 1546 25 July 2012 at 5:25am
By Arnav90
WHy ws Lord Bramha cursed by Lord Shiva?

2 3

snehalS 16 60542 28 December 2011 at 5:31am
By eternity_of_luv

Forum Quick Jump

Forum Category

Active Forums

Devon ke Dev Mahadev Topic Index

Limit search to this Forum only.

 

Disclaimer: All Logos and Pictures of various Channels, Shows, Artistes, Media Houses, Companies, Brands etc. belong to their respective owners, and are used to merely visually identify the Channels, Shows, Companies, Brands, etc. to the viewer. Incase of any issue please contact the webmaster.